Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 1;34(7):896-910.
doi: 10.15252/embj.201490061. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

Tox: a multifunctional transcription factor and novel regulator of mammalian corticogenesis

Benedetta Artegiani  1 , Antonio M de Jesus Domingues  2 , Sara Bragado Alonso  1 , Elisabeth Brandl  1 , Simone Massalini  1 , Andreas Dahl  2 , Federico Calegari  3
Affiliations

Tox: a multifunctional transcription factor and novel regulator of mammalian corticogenesis

Benedetta Artegiani et al. EMBO J. .

Abstract

Major efforts are invested to characterize the factors controlling the proliferation of neural stem cells. During mammalian corticogenesis, our group has identified a small pool of genes that are transiently downregulated in the switch of neural stem cells to neurogenic division and reinduced in newborn neurons. Among these switch genes, we found Tox, a transcription factor with hitherto uncharacterized roles in the nervous system. Here, we investigated the role of Tox in corticogenesis by characterizing its expression at the tissue, cellular and temporal level. We found that Tox is regulated by calcineurin/Nfat signalling. Moreover, we combined DNA adenine methyltransferase identification (DamID) with deep sequencing to characterize the chromatin binding properties of Tox including its motif and downstream transcriptional targets including Sox2, Tbr2, Prox1 and other key factors. Finally, we manipulated Tox in the developing brain and validated its multiple roles in promoting neural stem cell proliferation and neurite outgrowth of newborn neurons. Our data provide a valuable resource to study the role of Tox in other tissues and highlight a novel key player in brain development.

Keywords: DamID sequencing; HMG‐box transcription factors; Tox; brain development; neural stem cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tox is expressed in temporal and spatial gradients

  1. A-C Fluorescence pictures of WT (A and B) or Btg2RFP (C) mouse brains at E9.5, E12.5, E15.5 or E18.5 (as indicated) after immunohistochemistry for Tox (A-C; red), Tubb3 (B; green), Sox2 (C; white) or RFP (C; magenta) and DAPI counterstaining (A; blue).

  2. D Quantification of Sox2+ or Btg2RFP+ cells within the Tox+ population (left; n = 3; error bars = SD) and immunoreactivity levels (au = arbitrary units) of each of the two makers relative to Tox represented as a linear correlation (middle; n = 79) or box plot (right; n ≥ 24), respectively. ***P < 0.001. Scale bars, 50 μm (A) or 40 μm (B).

Figure 2
Figure 2
Tox is regulated by calcineurin/Nfat4 signalling

  1. A-B′ Layout of CsA, or vehicle as control, administration during embryonic development (A) and Western blot analysis (B) of Tox levels in cytoplasmic (cyt) or nuclear (nuc) fractions of E15.5 brains. Quantifications (B′) were performed upon internal normalization for Gadph or Tbp and referred to treatment with vehicle. n = 3; error bars = SD; *P < 0.05.

  2. C Map of Tox locus and Nfat-binding recognition sites (red) identified by MatInspector.

  3. D-E′ Layout of CsA or vehicle administration and Western blot analysis as in (A–B′) upon in utero electroporation with CA-Nfat3 or CA-Nfat4 vectors at E13.5. Tox in extracts of E15.5 brains was quantified normalized to Tbp and referred to CsA treatment. n = 3; error bars = SD; ***P < 0.001.

  4. F-G′ Fluorescent pictures of the mouse cortex upon electroporation with GFP, CA-Nfat3 or CA-Nfat4 (as indicated) followed by GFP (green) or Tox (G; red) immunolabelling and DAPI counterstaining (blue). Tox upregulation after CA-Nfat4 overexpression was assessed within nuclei of GFP+ cells (n = 30) in the VZ and represented as a box plot relative to GFP− cells (n = 30) used as internal control (G′). Tox ectopic expression within the SVZ is indicated (G; arrowheads). Scale bar, 50 μm (F) and 5 μm (G); **P < 0.01.

Figure 3
Figure 3
DamID-Seq identifies Tox targets

  1. A Pearson's correlation analysis between Tox-Dam versus Dam reads of HEK-293T cells sampling the genome in windows of 10 kb.

  2. B Meta-analysis of normalized Tox-Dam at the transcription start site (TSS) of Ensembl-annotated genes.

  3. C Profile of normalized Tox-Dam reads on cell-specific enhancers (colours; categories ordered according to enrichment). Background (grey) was assessed based on the Tox signal at random genomic locations.

  4. D Relationship between the fold-change of Tox peaks and their distance to the TSS. Note the enrichment in peaks at the boundary of ±15 kb from TSS and the correlation between their fold-change and proximity to the TSS.

  5. D′ Distribution of Tox peaks within regions of loci (as indicated). The relative length of each genomic region was chosen to represent its average length across the human genome and circles distributed to represent the proportion of Tox peaks mapping on that given region (1 circle = 1%).

  6. E PhastCons scores of 100 vertebrate genomes averaged for the Tox peak locations (blue) and for a matched genomic background (grey) showing higher conservation within Tox peaks (start-end).

  7. F Putative 10-mer binding motif of Tox identified with gimmeMotifs.

Figure 4
Figure 4
Tox controls neurogenic determinants

  1. Functional enrichment scores for cellular compartment, molecular function and biological process (left to right).

  2. Examples of Tox-Dam (green) or Dam (grey) peaks (superimposed in each panel) for Gli1, Eomes/Tbr2 and Robo2 (top to bottom) to represent factors involved in signalling, neurogenic commitment and neurite outgrowth, respectively.

  3. qRT–PCRs of GFP+ FAC-sorted cells from the E15.5 mouse brain upon electroporation at E13.5 with control (white) or Tox (black) constructs. Primers (Supplementary Table S1) were selected to amplify multi-exon transcripts (indicated) to represent the classes of genes that would explain functional annotations in (A). n ≥ 3; error bars = SD; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Figure 5
Figure 5
Tox promotes progenitor expansion and inhibits neurogenesis

  1. A-D Fluorescence pictures (left) and quantifications (right) of GFP+ (green) cells of the E15.5 lateral cortex positive for Btg2RFP (B), Tbr2 (C), Sox2 (D) (red) or p-Vim (D; white) upon electroporation with control or Tox (white or black bars, respectively) plasmids at E13.5. n ≥ 3; error bars = SD (except box plot in D, middle; n ≥ 50); ns = not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Scale bars, 50 μm.

Figure 6
Figure 6
Tox promotes neurite outgrowth and neuronal fate

  1. A-B′ Experimental layout (A), fluorescence pictures (B) and quantifications (B′) used to assess neuronal migration and output upon electroporation with GFP or Tox (B′; as indicated) plasmids at E13.5 followed by BrdU exposure and sacrifice as shown in (A). Neuronal migration was assessed by calculating the distribution of GFP+/BrdU+ cells within five equidistant bins of the IZ (B and B′; left), while output was quantified as the proportion of GFP+/BrdU+ in the IZ and CP relative to all GFP+ cells (B'; right). n = 2; error bars = SEM. Scale bar, 50 μm.

  2. C, D 3D reconstruction (left) and quantification (right) of newborn (C) or polarized (D) neurons in the IZ or CP, respectively. Individual Z-stacks (0.1 μm optical thickness; green) and computer reconstructions (grey) were used to count cell protrusions (C; arrowheads) or neurite length (D; purple line) that were statistically evaluated (box plots; right, n ≥ 49; ***P < 0.001). Scale bars, 10 μm.

  3. E Fluorescence pictures (left) of the E18.5 mouse cortex upon electroporation of GFP or Tox plasmids at E13.5 followed by immunohistochemistry for GFP (green), Ctip2 (white), Satb2 (red) and DAPI counterstaining (blue). Quantification of Ctip2+/GFP+ cells is shown in either condition (right). n = 3; **P < 0.01; error bars = SD. Scale bar, 50 μm.

Figure 7
Figure 7
Model of Tox activity Model summarizing the regulation and induced molecular effects of Tox as deduced from the literature (red arrows) and our own experiments (black arrows). We propose that activation of calcineurin signalling promotes Tox expression through nuclear transport of Nfat4, which results in Tox-induced transcriptional regulation of different sets of genes (some indicated) in PP or neurons (N) to ultimately control stem cell fate (left) or neurite outgrowth (right) through yet to be characterized cell-specific co-factors (X and Y).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • In-TOX-icating neurogenesis.
    Karow M, Berninger B. Karow M, et al. EMBO J. 2015 Apr 1;34(7):832-4. doi: 10.15252/embj.201591107. Epub 2015 Feb 17. EMBO J. 2015. PMID: 25691243 Free PMC article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Aliahmad P, O'Flaherty E, Han P, Goularte OD, Wilkinson B, Satake M, Molkentin JD, Kaye J. TOX provides a link between calcineurin activation and CD8 lineage commitment. J Exp Med. 2004;199:1089–1099. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aliahmad P, de la Torre B, Kaye J. Shared dependence on the DNA-binding factor TOX for the development of lymphoid tissue-inducer cell and NK cell lineages. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:945–952. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aliahmad P, Seksenyan A, Kaye J. The many roles of TOX in the immune system. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24:173–177. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersson R, Gebhard C, Miguel-Escalada I, Hoof I, Bornholdt J, Boyd M, Chen Y, Zhao X, Schmidl C, Suzuki T, Ntini E, Arner E, Valen E, Li K, Schwarzfischer L, Glatz D, Raithel J, Lilje B, Rapin N, Bagger FO, et al. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature. 2014;507:455–461. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aprea J, Calegari F. Bioelectric state and cell cycle control of Mammalian neural stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012:816049. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms