Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul;6(11):1265-90.
doi: 10.4155/fmc.14.60.

The essential roles of chemistry in high-throughput screening triage

Affiliations
Review

The essential roles of chemistry in high-throughput screening triage

Jayme L Dahlin et al. Future Med Chem. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

It is increasingly clear that academic high-throughput screening (HTS) and virtual HTS triage suffers from a lack of scientists trained in the art and science of early drug discovery chemistry. Many recent publications report the discovery of compounds by screening that are most likely artifacts or promiscuous bioactive compounds, and these results are not placed into the context of previous studies. For HTS to be most successful, it is our contention that there must exist an early partnership between biologists and medicinal chemists. Their combined skill sets are necessary to design robust assays and efficient workflows that will weed out assay artifacts, false positives, promiscuous bioactive compounds and intractable screening hits, efforts that ultimately give projects a better chance at identifying truly useful chemical matter. Expertise in medicinal chemistry, cheminformatics and purification sciences (analytical chemistry) can enhance the post-HTS triage process by quickly removing these problematic chemotypes from consideration, while simultaneously prioritizing the more promising chemical matter for follow-up testing. It is only when biologists and chemists collaborate effectively that HTS can manifest its full promise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Primary impact points for chemistry in high-throughput screening and early lead discovery
The location of impact points covering the pre- and post-HTS stages highlights the importance of forming early partnerships between chemists and biologists in order to increase the chances of project success. HTS: High-throughput screening; vHTS: Virtual high-throughput screening.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Libraries, their uses and the development of a quality screening set
Placement of representative libraries in this space is necessarily subject to debate. For example, virtual libraries of real compounds can be used in vHTS, and the GDB contains commercially available compounds. HTS: High-throughput screening; vHTS: Virtual high-throughput screening.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Alternative approaches to chemical matter other than high-throughput screening
PubChem and ChEMBL are examples of publicly available chemical databases [–43].
Figure 4
Figure 4. Sample post-high-throughput screening triage screening tree
The process begins with data hand-off from the HTS, from which a series of cheminformatics operations can be performed to standardize, filter and annotate the data. As compounds are progressed, more detailed and time-consuming (‘higher-level’) analyses and resource-intensive experiments can be performed. We note that the order and details of each operation can vary depending on multiple factors (e.g., target, assay methods, library size and composition, available resources, expertise, project timeline and data volume). For instance, some groups may elect to test all actives by dose–response and counterscreens, and then perform more detailed chemocentric and cheminformatic analyses with the resulting data. DR: Dose–response; H2L: Hit-to-lead; HTS: High-throughput screening; QC: Quality control.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Example of a cheminformatics-assisted core analysis during a post-high-throughput screening triage
See also Box 4. The annotated high-throughput screening data are from a PKA screen performed in the ITDD. (A) Singletons; (B–F) representative compounds from three core classes. (B) is an obvious PAINS (substructure alert bolded). Compound (C) is fasudil, a known kinase inhibitor. Compound (D) has a structure reminiscent of known kinase inhibitors (note that the core containing compound [D] has several examples of active and inactive analogs, a promising early pattern that shows potential for early SAR exploration and argues against many of these compounds being statistical false positives). Core13, which contains compounds (E & F), has a profile we typically view with skepticism (note that while [E] is deemed active, all remaining compounds in this core are inactive, including the close analog [F]). This example also shows that effective use of modern cheminformatics software allows for large amounts of complex data to be analyzed efficiently.
Figure 6
Figure 6. The natural history of PAINS compounds reported in a recent manuscript
Searches performed in SciFinder. ≥90%: Compounds that are greater than 90% similar; Biol: Compounds that were reported in a ‘biological study’ from a journal article [,–172]; Exact: Exact substructure found; Sources: Commercial sources of exact compound.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Frye S, Crosby M, Edwards T, Juliano R. US academic drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:409–410. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gurvich VJ, Byrn SR. NIPTE: a multi-university partnership supporting academic drug development. Drug Discov Today. 2013;18(19–20):916–921. - PubMed
    1. Rotella DP. Drug discovery 2012 and beyond. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2012;3(3):172–173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tralau-Stewart Cathy J, Wyatt Colin A, Kleyn Dominique E, Ayad A. Drug discovery: new models for industry–academic partnerships. Drug Discov Today. 2009;14(1–2):95–101. - PubMed
    1. Tralau-Stewart C, Low CMR, Marlin N. UK academic drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13(1):15–16. - PubMed

Publication types