Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jun 20:11:7.
doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-11-7. eCollection 2014.

Public health for the people: participatory infectious disease surveillance in the digital age

Affiliations
Review

Public health for the people: participatory infectious disease surveillance in the digital age

Oktawia P Wójcik et al. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. .

Abstract

The 21(st) century has seen the rise of Internet-based participatory surveillance systems for infectious diseases. These systems capture voluntarily submitted symptom data from the general public and can aggregate and communicate that data in near real-time. We reviewed participatory surveillance systems currently running in 13 different countries. These systems have a growing evidence base showing a high degree of accuracy and increased sensitivity and timeliness relative to traditional healthcare-based systems. They have also proven useful for assessing risk factors, vaccine effectiveness, and patterns of healthcare utilization while being less expensive, more flexible, and more scalable than traditional systems. Nonetheless, they present important challenges including biases associated with the population that chooses to participate, difficulty in adjusting for confounders, and limited specificity because of reliance only on syndromic definitions of disease limits. Overall, participatory disease surveillance data provides unique disease information that is not available through traditional surveillance sources.

Keywords: Dengue; Disease surveillance; Influenza-like illness; Participatory surveillance; Participatory surveillance system; Public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison between traditional healthcare surveillance and participatory surveillance.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paneth N. Assessing the contributions of John Snow to epidemiology: 150 years after removal of the broad street pump handle. Epidemiology. 2004;15:514–516. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000135915.94799.00. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fenner F, Henderson DA, Arita I, Jezek Z, Ladnyi ID. World Health Organization: Smallpox and Its Eradication. [ http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/39485]
    1. Mariner JC, House JA, Mebus CA, Sollod AE, Chibeu D, Jones BA, Roeder PL, Admassu B, van’t Klooster GGM. Rinderpest eradication: appropriate technology and social innovations. Science. 2012;337:1309–1312. doi: 10.1126/science.1223805. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marquet RL, Bartelds AIM, Van Noort SP, Koppeschaar CE, Paget J, Schellevis FG, van der Zee J. Internet-based monitoring of influenza-like illness (ILI) in the general population of the Netherlands during the 2003–2004 influenza season. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:242. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-242. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Influenzanet. http://www.influenzanet.eu/en/method/

LinkOut - more resources