A partial hearing animal model for chronic electro-acoustic stimulation
- PMID: 24921595
- PMCID: PMC4116305
- DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/4/046008
A partial hearing animal model for chronic electro-acoustic stimulation
Abstract
Objective: Cochlear implants (CIs) have provided some auditory function to hundreds of thousands of people around the world. Although traditionally carried out only in profoundly deaf patients, the eligibility criteria for implantation have recently been relaxed to include many partially-deaf patients with useful levels of hearing. These patients receive both electrical stimulation from their implant and acoustic stimulation via their residual hearing (electro-acoustic stimulation; EAS) and perform very well. It is unclear how EAS improves speech perception over electrical stimulation alone, and little evidence exists about the nature of the interactions between electric and acoustic stimuli. Furthermore, clinical results suggest that some patients that undergo cochlear implantation lose some, if not all, of their residual hearing, reducing the advantages of EAS over electrical stimulation alone. A reliable animal model with clinically-relevant partial deafness combined with clinical CIs is important to enable these issues to be studied. This paper outlines such a model that has been successfully used in our laboratory.
Approach: This paper outlines a battery of techniques used in our laboratory to generate, validate and examine an animal model of partial deafness and chronic CI use.
Main results: Ototoxic deafening produced bilaterally symmetrical hearing thresholds in neonatal and adult animals. Electrical activation of the auditory system was confirmed, and all animals were chronically stimulated via adapted clinical CIs. Acoustic compound action potentials (CAPs) were obtained from partially-hearing cochleae, using the CI amplifier. Immunohistochemical analysis allows the effects of deafness and electrical stimulation on cell survival to be studied.
Significance: This animal model has applications in EAS research, including investigating the functional interactions between electric and acoustic stimulation, and the development of techniques to maintain residual hearing following cochlear implantation. The ability to record CAPs via the CI has clinical direct relevance for obtaining objective measures of residual hearing.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Electroacoustic stimulation: now and into the future.Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:350504. doi: 10.1155/2014/350504. Epub 2014 Sep 4. Biomed Res Int. 2014. PMID: 25276779 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of an enhanced acoustic environment on residual hearing following chronic cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation in the partially deafened cat.Hear Res. 2022 Dec;426:108635. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108635. Epub 2022 Oct 13. Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 36306607
-
Chronic Electro-Acoustic Stimulation May Interfere With Electric Threshold Recovery After Cochlear Implantation in the Aged Guinea Pig.Ear Hear. 2024 Nov-Dec 01;45(6):1554-1567. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001545. Epub 2024 Jul 12. Ear Hear. 2024. PMID: 38992863
-
Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.Hear Res. 2015 Sep;327:163-74. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jun 16. Hear Res. 2015. PMID: 26087114 Free PMC article.
-
Animal Models of Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation and Electrical Stimulation.Hear Res. 2022 Dec;426:108624. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108624. Epub 2022 Sep 29. Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 36207191 Review.
Cited by
-
Differential Effects of Low- and High-Dose Dexamethasone on Electrically Induced Damage of the Cultured Organ of Corti.Neurotox Res. 2020 Aug;38(2):487-497. doi: 10.1007/s12640-020-00228-7. Epub 2020 Jun 3. Neurotox Res. 2020. PMID: 32495312 Free PMC article.
-
Electroacoustic stimulation: now and into the future.Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:350504. doi: 10.1155/2014/350504. Epub 2014 Sep 4. Biomed Res Int. 2014. PMID: 25276779 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.J Neural Eng. 2017 Aug;14(4):046020. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa7586. J Neural Eng. 2017. PMID: 28607224 Free PMC article.
-
Second spatial derivative analysis of cortical surface potentials recorded in cat primary auditory cortex using thin film surface arrays: Comparisons with multi-unit data.J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Jul 15;267:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 6. J Neurosci Methods. 2016. PMID: 27060384 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral frequency discrimination ability of partially deafened cats using cochlear implants.Hear Res. 2014 Sep;315:61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jul 5. Hear Res. 2014. PMID: 25008966 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Altschuler RA, Hoffman DW, et al. Localization of dynorphin B-like and alpha-neoendorphin-like immunoreactivities in the guinea pig organ of Corti. Hearing research. 1985;17(3):249–258. - PubMed
-
- Berglund AM, Ryugo DK. Neurofilament antibodies and spiral ganglion neurons of the mammalian cochlea. The Journal of comparative neurology. 1991;306(3):393–408. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous