Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul:19:169-75.
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice and cancer

Tomas Aparicio  1 , Richard Baer  2 , Jean Gautier  3
Affiliations
Review

DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice and cancer

Tomas Aparicio et al. DNA Repair (Amst). 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Since DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) contribute to the genomic instability that drives cancer development, DSB repair pathways serve as important mechanisms for tumor suppression. Thus, genetic lesions, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, that disrupt DSB repair are often associated with cancer susceptibility. In addition, recent evidence suggests that DSB "mis-repair", in which DSBs are resolved by an inappropriate repair pathway, can also promote genomic instability and presumably tumorigenesis. This notion has gained currency from recent cancer genome sequencing studies which have uncovered numerous chromosomal rearrangements harboring pathological DNA repair signatures. In this perspective, we discuss the factors that regulate DSB repair pathway choice and their consequences for genome stability and cancer.

Keywords: 53BP1–BRCA1; DNA double strand break; DNA ends; Microhomology-mediated end joining; Repair pathway choice; Resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. DSB repair pathway choices and their regulation
The three major modalities of DSB repair (NHEJ, HDR and MMEJ/SSA) are depicted. NHEJ can process ligatable DNA ends but is inhibited by modified/damaged DNA ends. In contrast, MMEH or HDR, which both initiate by resection, can process both types of ends. Competition between NHEJ and HDR takes place directly on DNA ends between KU and MRN, as well as in the vicinity of the break between 53BP1 and BRCA1. HDR is not operating in G1 due to the absence of a sister chromatin as homologous template. NHEJ in S-phase is toxic. See text for details.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Rich T, Allen RL, Wyllie AH. Defying death after DNA damage. Nature. 2000;407:777–783. - PubMed
    1. Hoeijmakers JH. DNA damage, aging, and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1475–1485. - PubMed
    1. Lieber MR. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:181–211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pommier Y. Drugging topoisomerases: lessons and challenges. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8:82–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudin N, Haber JE. Efficient repair of HO-induced chromosomal breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by recombination between flanking homologous sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1988;8:3918–3928. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances