Assessment of response to therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma
- PMID: 24716738
- PMCID: PMC4008698
- DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2014.891355
Assessment of response to therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma
Abstract
The appropriate use of conventional or potential treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma requires that benefit can be shown. Therefore, the accurate assessment of response is both critical and essential. Demonstration of benefit observed will be determined by the criteria used. However, the use of conventional criteria based on anatomical imaging to assess response and progression is inadequate. Limitations occur due to the unique nature, presentation, and course of hepatocellular cancer, any underlying concomitant disease, the multiplicity of treatment options, and the challenges in assessing viable tumor. Locoregional therapies or cytostatic therapies can have beneficial effects and induce tumor necrosis without appreciable changes in tumor size. In recognition of the inherent limitations in conventional imaging criteria, various modifications have been proposed. In this review, the goals of assessing tumor response in clinical practice and in clinical trials are outlined. The varying patterns of response to different therapeutic modalities such as locoregional therapy and molecularly targeted therapy are reviewed, and an approach to the assessment of response based on clinical, biochemical, morphological, and functional criteria has been outlined. The implications of current and proposed approaches of assessing response for clinical practice or design of clinical trials are reviewed.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: There are no conflicts of interest
Figures
Similar articles
-
Imaging assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma response to locoregional and systemic therapy.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jul;201(1):80-96. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.10706. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013. PMID: 23789661 Review.
-
Radiological biomarkers for assessing response to locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: From morphological to functional imaging (Review).Oncol Rep. 2017 Mar;37(3):1337-1346. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5420. Epub 2017 Feb 3. Oncol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28184942 Review.
-
Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 16;2:CD011313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011313.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 24;1:CD011313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011313.pub3. PMID: 26905230 Updated. Review.
-
Assessing Imaging Response to Therapy.Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Sep;53(5):1077-88. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.05.010. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 26321455 Review.
-
Prospective evaluation of patients with early-/intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with disease progression following arterial locoregional therapy: candidacy for systemic treatment or clinical trials.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Aug;24(8):1189-1197.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.12.025. Epub 2013 Mar 7. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23474327
Cited by
-
Impact of margin status on long-term results of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: single-center time-to-recurrence analysis.Updates Surg. 2020 Mar;72(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00686-5. Epub 2019 Oct 17. Updates Surg. 2020. PMID: 31625024
-
Comparison of the safety and prognosis of sequential regorafenib after sorafenib and lenvatinib treatment failure in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(3):1278-1288. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-404. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35837155 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical implication of Keap1 and phosphorylated Nrf2 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer Med. 2016 Oct;5(10):2678-2687. doi: 10.1002/cam4.788. Epub 2016 Sep 20. Cancer Med. 2016. PMID: 27650414 Free PMC article.
-
The clinical behavior and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and a family history of the disease.Cancer Med. 2019 Nov;8(15):6624-6633. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2543. Epub 2019 Sep 18. Cancer Med. 2019. PMID: 31532075 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva Albany, N.Y.: World Health Organization; 1979. sold by WHO Publications Centre USA.
-
- Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205–216. - PubMed
-
- Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228–247. - PubMed
-
- McIntire KR, Vogel CL, Primack A, Waldmann TA, Kyalwazi SK. Effect of surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment on alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 1976 Feb;37(2):677–683. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical