Liquid paraffin is superior to 2% lidocaine gel in reducing urethral pain during urodynamic study in men: A pilot study
- PMID: 24610603
- DOI: 10.1002/nau.22581
Liquid paraffin is superior to 2% lidocaine gel in reducing urethral pain during urodynamic study in men: A pilot study
Abstract
Aims: To compare the pain perception between intraurethral instillation of 2% lidocaine gel and liquid paraffin during Urodynamic study in men.
Methods: A randomized, single-blind comparison trial was conducted. Forty men scheduled to undergo multichannel Urodynamic study were randomized to receive either 10 ml of 2% lidocaine gel (group 1, n = 20) or 10 ml of liquid paraffin (group 2, n = 20). Patients recorded their pain on a 0-10 visual analog scale prior to lubricant instillation, immediately after lubricant instillation, after the introduction of the Urodynamic catheter, 5 and 30 min after the catheter was taken out.
Results: pain scores were significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 immediately after the instillation of the lubricants (4.2 ± 1.5 vs. 2.6 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) and after catheterization (4.8 ± 1.5 vs. 3.5 ± 1.1, P < 0.01). There were no differences in the pain scores between the two groups in the other time points that were evaluated.
Conclusions: Liquid paraffin is more efficient than 2% lidocaine gel in reducing urethral pain during Urodynamic study in men. Pain scores were specifically better during the instillation of the lubricant and during the delivery of the urethral catheter.
Keywords: lidocaine; liquid; men; pain; paraffin; urodynamics.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Lidocaine gel should be more effective in reducing urethral pain during urodynamic study in men: Re: Stav K, Taleb E, Sabler IM, Siegel YI, Beberashvili I, Zisman A. Liquid paraffin is superior to 2% lidocaine gel in reducing urethral pain during urodynamic study in men: A pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;34:450-3.Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Jun;34(5):454-5. doi: 10.1002/nau.22676. Epub 2014 Oct 12. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015. PMID: 25307870 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Lidocaine gel should be more effective in reducing urethral pain during urodynamic study in men: Re: Stav K, Taleb E, Sabler IM, Siegel YI, Beberashvili I, Zisman A. Liquid paraffin is superior to 2% lidocaine gel in reducing urethral pain during urodynamic study in men: A pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;34:450-3.Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Jun;34(5):454-5. doi: 10.1002/nau.22676. Epub 2014 Oct 12. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015. PMID: 25307870 No abstract available.
-
Pain during Female Urethral Catheterization: Intraurethral Lubricant Injection versus Catheter Tip Lubrication--A Prospective Randomized Trial.J Urol. 2015 Oct;194(4):1018-21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.097. Epub 2015 Mar 25. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25818032 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized controlled trial of 2% lidocaine gel versus water-based lubricant for multi-channel urodynamics.Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1297-1302. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3576-8. Epub 2018 Feb 17. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 29455237 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis: does lidocaine gel before flexible cystoscopy provide pain relief?BJU Int. 2009 Aug;104(4):506-9; discussion 509-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08417.x. Epub 2009 Feb 23. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 19239453 Review.
-
Use of lubricant in female urethral catheterization.Br J Nurs. 2005 Oct 27-Nov 9;14(19):1022-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2005.14.19.19945. Br J Nurs. 2005. PMID: 16301946 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing the effectiveness and lubricity of a novel Shea lubricant to 2% lidocaine gel for digital rectal examination: a randomized non-inferiority trial.Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 22;13(1):4666. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31555-2. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36949085 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical