Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Summer-Autumn;4(3-4):95-101.

Comparison of Duration of Spinal Anesthesia with Lidocaine or Lidocaine plus Epinephrine between Addicts and Non-addicts

Affiliations

Comparison of Duration of Spinal Anesthesia with Lidocaine or Lidocaine plus Epinephrine between Addicts and Non-addicts

Afshin Mansourian et al. Addict Health. 2012 Summer-Autumn.

Abstract

Background: Duration of spinal anesthesia depends on the type of anesthetic agent, dosage and additive materials such as epinephrine, ephedrine and opioid. We compared the duration of spinal anesthesia with lidocaine 5% with or without epinephrine in addict and non-addict patients undergoing inferior limb fracture surgery.

Methods: This single blinded randomized clinical trial was performed on 201 males (height ranged 150-180 cm) who referred to the Shahid Bahonar Hospital of Kerman for the inferior limb fracture. Their physical class was matched to the American association standard class 1 and 2, and they were appropriate candidates for the spinal anesthesia. The addict or non-addict groups were each divided into two subgroups. 75 mg of 5% lidocaine was prescribed for one subgroup, and the other subgroup received 75 mg of 5% lidocaine plus 0.2 mg epinephrine. The level of primary anesthesia was elevated to T6. Duration of returning to the 4 primary sensory levels was measured since baseline.

Findings: A significant increase in the duration of anesthesia level in both addict and non-addict patients receiving lidocaine plus epinephrine was observed compared to the subgroups receiving lidocaine alone (P < 0.01). Duration of decrease in sensory level in addict subgroups receiving lidocaine or lidocaine plus epinephrine was lower compared to non-addict patients (P < 0.001). In addict subgroup receiving lidocaine alone, a significant decrease was observed in the time needed for decrease in sensory level (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: According to the results of this study, regardless of the anesthetic agent being used, duration of spinal anesthesia was shorter in addict patients compared to non-addict ones. Addition of epinephrine to lidocaine 5% increased the duration of spinal anesthesia in both addict and non-addict patients.

Keywords: Addict; Epinephrine; Lidocaine; Spinal anesthesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of duration of sensory perception level recovery in addicts and non-addicts in the presence of lidocaine (Lid) and lidocaine plus epinephrine (Epi) ** P < 0.01 *** P < 0.001 for duration of sensory level recovery for lidocaine + epinephrine compared to only lidocaine in addicted and non-addicted patients †† P < 0.01 ††† P < 0.001 for duration of sensory level recovery in addicted and non-addicted patients

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kokki H. Spinal blocks. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(1):56–64. - PubMed
    1. Brown D. Spinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia, Anesthesia. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller's Anesthesia. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 1994.
    1. Larson CP. Miller's Anesthesia. Anesth Analg; 2010;110(1):263–5.
    1. Bovill JG. Mechanisms of actions of opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 1997;15:9–15. - PubMed
    1. Christie MJ. Cellular neuroadaptations to chronic opioids: tolerance, withdrawal and addiction. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154(2):384–96. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources