Biological diversity in the patent system
- PMID: 24265714
- PMCID: PMC3827099
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078737
Biological diversity in the patent system
Abstract
Biological diversity in the patent system is an enduring focus of controversy but empirical analysis of the presence of biodiversity in the patent system has been limited. To address this problem we text mined 11 million patent documents for 6 million Latin species names from the Global Names Index (GNI) established by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and Encyclopedia of Life (EOL). We identified 76,274 full Latin species names from 23,882 genera in 767,955 patent documents. 25,595 species appeared in the claims section of 136,880 patent documents. This reveals that human innovative activity involving biodiversity in the patent system focuses on approximately 4% of taxonomically described species and between 0.8-1% of predicted global species. In this article we identify the major features of the patent landscape for biological diversity by focusing on key areas including pharmaceuticals, neglected diseases, traditional medicines, genetic engineering, foods, biocides, marine genetic resources and Antarctica. We conclude that the narrow focus of human innovative activity and ownership of genetic resources is unlikely to be in the long term interest of humanity. We argue that a broader spectrum of biodiversity needs to be opened up to research and development based on the principles of equitable benefit-sharing, respect for the objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity, human rights and ethics. Finally, we argue that alternative models of innovation, such as open source and commons models, are required to open up biodiversity for research that addresses actual and neglected areas of human need. The research aims to inform the implementation of the 2010 Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization and international debates directed to the governance of genetic resources. Our research also aims to inform debates under the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore at the World Intellectual Property Organization.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Corporate control and global governance of marine genetic resources.Sci Adv. 2018 Jun 6;4(6):eaar5237. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar5237. eCollection 2018 Jun. Sci Adv. 2018. PMID: 29881777 Free PMC article.
-
25 years after the `Rio Convention'--Lessons learned in the context of sustainable development and protecting indigenous and local knowledge.Phytomedicine. 2019 Feb;53:332-343. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.04.061. Epub 2018 May 10. Phytomedicine. 2019. PMID: 30318154 Review.
-
Access and Benefit Sharing Under the Nagoya Protocol-Quo Vadis? Six Latin American Case Studies Assessing Opportunities and Risk.Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jun 8;11:765. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00765. eCollection 2020. Front Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 32581783 Free PMC article.
-
Intellectual Property and biodiversity: interplay.Pharm Pat Anal. 2017 May;6(3):105-114. doi: 10.4155/ppa-2017-0003. Epub 2017 May 9. Pharm Pat Anal. 2017. PMID: 28485650
-
Access to and use of marine genetic resources: understanding the legal framework.Nat Prod Rep. 2014 May;31(5):612-6. doi: 10.1039/c3np70123a. Epub 2014 Mar 26. Nat Prod Rep. 2014. PMID: 24671635 Review.
Cited by
-
Corporate control and global governance of marine genetic resources.Sci Adv. 2018 Jun 6;4(6):eaar5237. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar5237. eCollection 2018 Jun. Sci Adv. 2018. PMID: 29881777 Free PMC article.
-
Myth-busting the provider-user relationship for digital sequence information.Gigascience. 2021 Dec 29;10(12):giab085. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab085. Gigascience. 2021. PMID: 34966927 Free PMC article.
-
Marine Terpenoids from Polar Latitudes and Their Potential Applications in Biotechnology.Mar Drugs. 2020 Jul 29;18(8):401. doi: 10.3390/md18080401. Mar Drugs. 2020. PMID: 32751369 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- McCalman P (2001) Reaping what you sow: an empirical analysis of international patent harmonization. Journal of International Economics 55: 161–186.
-
- Maskus K, Reichman J (eds.) (2005) International Public Goods And Transfer Of Technology Under A Globalized Intellectual Property Regime. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
-
- Correa CM (2007) Trade related aspects of intellectual property rights: a commentary on the TRIPS agreement. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
-
- Dutfield G (2000) Intellectual Property Rights, Trade and Biodiversity: Seeds and Plant Varieties. London: Earthscan.
-
- Dutfield G (2004) Intellectual property, biogenetic resources, and traditional knowledge. London: Earthscan.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources