Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec 1;11(4):643-52.
eCollection 2012.

Field based reliability and validity of the bioharness™ multivariable monitoring device

James A Johnstone  1 , Paul A Ford, Gerwyn Hughes, Tim Watson, Andrew C S Mitchell, Andrew T Garrett
Affiliations

Field based reliability and validity of the bioharness™ multivariable monitoring device

James A Johnstone et al. J Sports Sci Med. .

Abstract

The Bioharness™ device is designed for monitoring physiological variables in free-living situations but has only been proven to be reliable and valid in a laboratory environment. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of the Bioharness™ using a field based protocol. Twenty healthy males participated. Heart rate (HR), breathing frequency (BF) and accelerometry (ACC) were assessed by simultaneous measurement of two Bioharness™ devices and a test-retest of a discontinuous incremental walk-jog-run protocol (4 - 11 km·h(-1)) completed in a sports hall. Adopted precision of measurement devices were; HR: Polar T31 (Polar Electro), BF: Spirometer (Cortex Metalyser), ACC: Oxygen expenditure (Cortex Metalyser). For all data, precision of measurement reported good relationships (r = 0.61 to 0.67, p < 0.01) and large Limits of Agreement for HR (>79.2 b·min(-1)) and BF (>54.7 br·min(-1)). ACC presented excellent precision (r = 0.94, p < 0.01). Results for HR (r= ~0.91, p < 0.01: CV <7.6) and ACC (r > 0.97, p < 0.01; CV <14.7) suggested these variables are reliable. BF presented more variable data (r = 0.46-0.61, p < 0.01; CV < 23.7). As velocity of movement increased (>8 km·h(-1)) data became more erroneous. A data cleaning protocol removed gross errors in the data analysis and subsequent reliability and validity statistics improved across all variables. In conclusion, the Bioharness™ HR and ACC variables have demonstrated reliability and validity in a field setting, though data collected at higher velocities should be treated with caution. Measuring human physiological responses in a field based environment allows for more ecologically valid data to be collected and devices such as the Bioharness™ could be used by exercise professionals to begin to further investigate this area.

Keywords: Multi-variable; ecological validity; new technology; physiological monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Profile of HR and BF data removal (%) at different velocities during data cleaning process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Achten J., Jeukendrup E.(2003) Heart rate monitoring: Applications and limitations. Journal of Sports Medicine 33, 517-538 - PubMed
    1. Astrand P., Rohdahl K., Dahl H., Stromme S.(2003) Textbook of work physiology, Champaign IL, Human Kinetics.
    1. Atkinson G., Nevill A.M.(1998) Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine 26, 217-238 - PubMed
    1. Bartlett R.(2006) Medicine and science in cricket. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 9, 470-471 - PubMed
    1. Bartlett R., Wheat J., Robins M.(2007)Is movement variability important for sports biomechanists? Sports Biomechanics 6, 223-243 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources