Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;17(2):395-406.
doi: 10.1007/s10456-013-9393-2. Epub 2013 Oct 20.

The effects of inflammatory cytokines on lymphatic endothelial barrier function

Affiliations

The effects of inflammatory cytokines on lymphatic endothelial barrier function

Walter E Cromer et al. Angiogenesis. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Proper lymphatic function is necessary for the transport of fluids, macromolecules, antigens and immune cells out of the interstitium. The lymphatic endothelium plays important roles in the modulation of lymphatic contractile activity and lymph transport, but it's role as a barrier between the lymph and interstitial compartments is less well understood. Alterations in lymphatic function have long been associated with edema and inflammation although the integrity of the lymphatic endothelial barrier during inflammation is not well-defined. In this paper we evaluated the integrity of the lymphatic barrier in response to inflammatory stimuli commonly associated with increased blood endothelial permeability. We utilized in vitro assays of lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) monolayer barrier function after treatment with different inflammatory cytokines and signaling molecules including TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, IFN-γ and LPS. Moderate increases in an index of monolayer barrier dysfunction were noted with all treatments (20-60 % increase) except IFN-γ which caused a greater than 2.5-fold increase. Cytokine-induced barrier dysfunction was blocked or reduced by the addition of LNAME, except for IL-1β and LPS treatments, suggesting a regulatory role for nitric oxide. The decreased LEC barrier was associated with modulation of both intercellular adhesion and intracellular cytoskeletal activation. Cytokine treatments reduced the expression of VE-cadherin and increased scavenging of β-catenin in the LECs and this was partially reversed by LNAME. Likewise the phosphorylation of myosin light chain 20 at the regulatory serine 19 site, which accompanied the elevated monolayer barrier dysfunction in response to cytokine treatment, was also blunted by LNAME application. This suggests that the lymphatic barrier is regulated during inflammation and that certain inflammatory signals may induce large increases in permeability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Immunofluorecent images of LYVE1 (green) (a) and Prox-1 (green) (b) stained with Alexafluor 488 secondary antibodies in RLECs, note the cell-to-cell variability in LYVE1 expression. Images of VE-cadherin (red) (c) and β-catenin (red) (d) co-stained with DAPI (blue) in RLECs stained with an Alexafluor 647 secondary antibody, the cells show a continuous belt of junction similar to cells of a collecting vessel type. All images were taken at 40X with 2X zoom magnification using a LEICA confocal microscope, images are average projections of stacks with a 0.5μm step size. Scale is 10μm
Fig 2
Fig 2
Permeability of RLEC monolayers to FITC-labled bovine serum albumin in response to inflammatory cytokines TNF-α (10ng/mL), Il-6 (100ng/mL), Il-1β (50ng/mL), LPS (50ng/mL) IFN-γ (10ng/mL). These treatments were carried out alone and in the presence of 1μM LNAME to test NO dependency of permeability (a). Western blot of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β treated cells at 24 hrs showing that IL-1β alone out of all tested cytokines induces an up regulation of iNOS (b). Specific cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-1β and TNF-α) were selected for further testing of NO production by Griess assay. TNF-α was used to test the efficacy of LNAME on NO production (after 24 hr to allow accumulation of nitrite), while IFN-γ and IL-1β represented the cytokines that had the greatest NO-dependent and NO-independent permeability effects respectively (c). Permeability data is representative from 6 experiments, n=3–6. Greiss assay data is representative of 3 experiments with n=3. * denotes significant departure from control (p≤0.05) as determined by ANOVA with Dunnett's post test.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Quantification of Western blotting of VE-cadherin (a) (normalized to β-actin) and MLC20/pMLC20 ratios (b) after 1hr of treatment with TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, LPS and IFN-γ alone and in the presence of LNAME. All data is compared to its corresponding control. Quantification of β-catenin levels (normalized to β-actin) after cytokine treatment showing apparent salvaging of β-catenin (c). * denotes significant departure from control (p≤0.05) as determined by ANOVA with Dunnett's post test, @ denotes significant difference from non-LNAME treated pair as determined by Student's two tailed t-test.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Effects of SNAP the NO donor on permeability (a), junctional components VE-cadherin (b) and β-catenin (d) and the MLC20/pMLC20 levels (c). SNAP treatment (10μM) induced an increase in permeability roughly equivalent to IFN-γ while SNAP (1μM) had no significant effect and 100μM SNAP caused cells to lift from the monolayer. SNAP treatment at 10μM caused a significant reduction in the levels of VE-cadherin after 1 hr of treatment however the salvaging phenomenon of β-catenin seen with cytokine treatment was not observed. MLC20 phosphorylation was not increased by SNAP treatment (10μM) which was unexpected. Data is representative of 3 experiments with n=3 and significance was determined by ANOVA with Dunnett's post test in the case of permeability experiments and Student's t-test in all other cases. * denotes significant departure from control (p≤0.05)
Fig 5
Fig 5
Effects of DETA-NONOnate on RLEC proliferation marker PCNA. Treatment with 100μM DETA-NONOnate caused no change in PCNA at 4 hrs (vs. 4 hrs control) while there was significant elevation of PCNA levels at 8 hrs (vs. 8hrs control), suggesting that NO can increase indices of proliferation in RLECs

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Casley-Smith JR. How the lymphatic system works. Lymphology. 1968;1(3):77–80. - PubMed
    1. Miteva DO, Rutkowski JM, Dixon JB, Kilarski W, Shields JD, Swartz MA. Transmural flow modulates cell and fluid transport functions of lymphatic endothelium. Circ Res. 2010;106(5):920–931. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.207274. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angeli V, Ginhoux F, Llodra J, Quemeneur L, Frenette PS, Skobe M, Jessberger R, Merad M, Randolph GJ. B cell-driven lymphangiogenesis in inflamed lymph nodes enhances dendritic cell mobilization. Immunity. 2006;24(2):203–215. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2006.01.003. - PubMed
    1. Angeli V, Randolph GJ. Inflammation, lymphatic function, and dendritic cell migration. Lymphat Res Biol. 2006;4(4):217–228. doi:10.1089/lrb.2006.4406. - PubMed
    1. Jakubzick C, Bogunovic M, Bonito AJ, Kuan EL, Merad M, Randolph GJ. Lymph-migrating, tissue-derived dendritic cells are minor constituents within steady-state lymph nodes. J Exp Med. 2008;205(12):2839–2850. doi:10.1084/jem.20081430. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources