Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e75486.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075486. eCollection 2013.

Performance of rapid diagnostic tests for imported malaria in clinical practice: results of a national multicenter study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance of rapid diagnostic tests for imported malaria in clinical practice: results of a national multicenter study

Sandrine Houzé et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

We compared the performance of four rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for imported malaria, and particularly Plasmodium falciparum infection, using thick and thin blood smears as the gold standard. All the tests are designed to detect at least one protein specific to P. falciparum (Plasmodium histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) or Plasmodium LDH (PfLDH)) and one pan-Plasmodium protein (aldolase or Plasmodium LDH (pLDH)). 1,311 consecutive patients presenting to 9 French hospitals with suspected malaria were included in this prospective study between April 2006 and September 2008. Blood smears revealed malaria parasites in 374 cases (29%). For the diagnosis of P. falciparum infection, the three tests detecting PfHRP2 showed high and similar sensitivity (96%), positive predictive value (PPV) (90%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (98%). The PfLDH test showed lower sensitivity (83%) and NPV (80%), despite good PPV (98%). For the diagnosis of non-falciparum species, the PPV and NPV of tests targeting pLDH or aldolase were 94-99% and 52-64%, respectively. PfHRP2-based RDTs are thus an acceptable alternative to routine microscopy for diagnosing P. falciparum malaria. However, as malaria may be misdiagnosed with RDTs, all negative results must be confirmed by the reference diagnostic method when clinical, biological or other factors are highly suggestive of malaria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization, WHO Global Malaria Programme World malaria report 2011. Available: http://www.who.int/malaria/world_malaria_report_2011/en/. Accessed 21 June 2012.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2010) Annual Epidemiological Report on Communicable Diseases in Europe 2010 Stockholm: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; . Available: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/publications/1011_sur_annual_epide... . Accessed 21 June 2012
    1. Hall-Baker PA, Nieves E, Jajosky RA Summary of Notifiable Diseases — United States, 2008. (2010) MMWR Surveill Summ 57: 1-94. Avalaible: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/mmwr_nd/index.html . Accessed 21 June 2012
    1. Casalino E, Le Bras J, Chaussin F, Fichelle A, Bouvet E (2002) Predictive factors of malaria in travelers to areas where malaria is endemic. Arch Intern Med 162: 1625-1630. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.14.1625. PubMed: 12123407. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal PJ (2012) How do we best diagnose malaria in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 86: 192-193. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0619. PubMed: 22302846. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

The study was supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health (PHRC AOR06066). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

LinkOut - more resources