Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 10;56(19):7636-50.
doi: 10.1021/jm401037h. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

Substrate-based fragment identification for the development of selective, nonpeptidic inhibitors of striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase

Affiliations

Substrate-based fragment identification for the development of selective, nonpeptidic inhibitors of striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase

Tyler D Baguley et al. J Med Chem. .

Abstract

High levels of striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP) activity are observed in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer's disease. Overexpression of STEP results in the dephosphorylation and inactivation of many key neuronal signaling molecules, including ionotropic glutamate receptors. Moreover, genetically reducing STEP levels in AD mouse models significantly reversed cognitive deficits and decreased glutamate receptor internalization. These results support STEP as a potential target for drug discovery for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Herein, a substrate-based approach for the discovery and optimization of fragments called substrate activity screening (SAS) has been applied to the development of low molecular weight (<450 Da) and nonpeptidic, single-digit micromolar mechanism-based STEP inhibitors with greater than 20-fold selectivity across multiple tyrosine and dual specificity phosphatases. Significant levels of STEP inhibition in rat cortical neurons are also observed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selected initial substrate hits obtained against STEP.
Figure 2
Figure 2
DFMP inhibitors 11 and 12 based on privileged substrate scaffolds 6 and 8.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Additional analogs based upon inhibitor 12m.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Rat cortical neurons were treated with vehicle or 12s (a) or 12t (b) (concentrations of 0.1, 1 or 10 µM) for 1 h and analyzed by Western blotting. (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s post hoc). Data represent the phospho-signal normalized to the total protein signal and GAPDH ± s.e.m. (n = 3–5 each group).
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Inhibitor Synthesis through Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling. aReagents: (a) ArBLn, PdCl2, CyJohnPhos, K2CO3, dioxane/H2O; (b) ArBLn, Pd(PPh3)4, Na2CO3, DME/EtOH/H2O.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Synthesis of Arylboronic Acids 17a aReagents: (a) N-bromosuccinimide, N,N-diisopropylamine, CH2Cl2; (b) n-butyllithium, Et2O; B(OMe)3; aqueous HCl.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Synthesis of Aryltrifluoroborates 18a aReagents: (a) n-butyllithium, Et2O; (b) ketone; aqueous NH4Cl; (c) Et3SiH, F3CCOOH, CH2Cl2; (d) Et2SiH2, [Ir(cod)Cl]2, benzene; B2pin2, HBpin, [Ir(cod)Cl]2, dtbpy, THF; aqueous KHF2.
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Synthesis of Diarylmethane-based Boron Reagents 22 and 24a aReagents: (a) PhMgBr, Et2O or 1-bromo-3-iodobenzene, n-butyllithium, THF; aldehyde; (b) Et3SiH, F3CCOOH, CH2Cl2; (c) Pd(dppf)Cl2, KOAc, B2pin2, DMSO; (d) n-butyllithium, THF; 3,4-dichlorobenzaldehyde.
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
Synthesis of α-Hydroxymethylphosphonic Acid Inhibitors 11o and 12ra aReagents: (a) Pd(PPh3)4, Na2CO3, DME/EtOH/H2O; (b) NaBH4, MeOH.
Scheme 6
Scheme 6
Synthesis of the Four Stereoisomeric α-Hydroxymethylphosphonic Acid Inhibitors 12s to 12va aReagents (a) P(OMnt)3, TMSCl, 0 °C; separation of diastereomers by recrystallization; (b) TMSCl, NaI, CH3CN; (c) i. n-butyllithium, tBuOMe; ii. ZnCl2; iii. n-butyllithium; iv. tetraethylethylenediamine, toluene; v. (+)-MIB or (−)-MIB (10% mol); vi. 3-bromobenzaldehyde; (d) Pd(dppf)Cl2, KOAc, B2Pin2, DMSO; (e) Pd(PPh3)4, Na2CO3, DME/EtOH/H2O.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. For a general overview of synaptic plasticity in neuropsychiatric disorders, see: Lüscher C, Issac JT. The synapse: center stage for many brain diseases. J. Physiol. 2009;587:727–729. Palop JJ, Chin J, Mucke L. A network dysfunction perspective on neurodegenerative diseases. Nature. 2006;443:768–773.

    1. Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer's disease is a synaptic failure. Science. 2002;298:789–791. - PubMed
    2. Burke SN, Barnes CA. Neural plasticity in the ageing brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006;7:30–40. - PubMed
    1. Stephan KE, Friston KJ, Frith CD. Dysconnection in Schizophrenia: from abnormal synaptic plasticity to failures of self-monitoring. Schizophrenia Bull. 2009;35:509–527. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Stephan KE, Baldeweg T, Friston KJ. Synaptic plasticity and dysconnection in Schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry. 2006;59:929–939. - PubMed
    1. Duman RS. Pathophysiology of depression: the concept of synaptic plasticity. Eur. Psychiatry. 2002;17:306–310. - PubMed
    1. Garner CC, Wetmore DZ. Synaptic pathology of Down syndrome. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2012;970:451–468. - PubMed
    2. Huttenlocher PR. Dendritic and synaptic pathology in mental retardation. Pediatr. Neurol. 1991;7:79–85. - PubMed
    3. O’Donnell WT, Warren ST. A decade of molecular studies of Fragile X syndrome. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2002;25:315–338. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms