Discrepancies in spine surgeon conflict of interest disclosures between a national meeting and physician payment listings on device manufacturer web sites
- PMID: 23830826
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.032
Discrepancies in spine surgeon conflict of interest disclosures between a national meeting and physician payment listings on device manufacturer web sites
Abstract
Background context: Previous studies have identified inconsistencies in physician conflict-of-interest disclosures at academic meetings. The Physician Payment Sunshine Act (PPSA) will require industry to disclose anything of value given to physicians by 2014. In preparation, some spine device companies have begun reporting payments online.
Purpose: To evaluate potential inconsistencies between physician disclosures and payments reported by industry before the PPSA implementation.
Study design: Comparison of publically available disclosure/payment data.
Patient sample: Physicians participating in the 2011 North American Spine Society (NASS) annual meeting and physicians listed on the 2010 physician payment web sites of Medtronic and Depuy Spine.
Methods: Disclosures of participants at NASS were compared with the published Medtronic and Depuy Spine physician payments. The periods reflected by the disclosures compared should have coincided (except the Depuy site, which was only listed for one quarter of the NASS disclosure period). Discrepancies were noted whenever participant disclosures and company listings did not match as well as whenever payment ranges did not overlap. Fisher's exact test was used to compare disclosure discrepancy rates based on Medtronic payment size. No funding was received for this work. The authors report no conflicts of interest directly related to this study; however, one of the authors does do consulting unrelated to this study.
Results: Medtronic and Depuy Spine were disclosed by 12.1% and 8.75% of NASS participants, respectively. Based on NASS disclosures, 52.4% of NASS participants affiliated with Medtronic had their disclosures inaccurately reflected on the Medtronic web site. Based on Medtronic payment postings, 45.7% of NASS participants listed on Medtronic's webpage had discrepancies in their NASS disclosures. Those who received payments <$100,000 from Medtronic were more likely to have discrepancies in their disclosures than those who received payments >$100,000 (p=.009). Based on Depuy Spine payment postings, 30% of NASS participants listed on Depuy Spine's site had discrepancies in their NASS disclosures.
Conclusions: Discrepancy rates between what spine surgeons disclosed at NASS 2011 and what companies reported for their consultants were high. This is concerning given the passage of the PPSA as well as the increased public visibility of potential discrepancies. More uniform practices will certainly be necessary.
Keywords: Conflict of interest; Disclosure; Industry; Medical ethics; Spine.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of conflict-of-interest disclosures reported by physicians.N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 8;361(15):1466-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0807160. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19812403
-
Accuracy Between AJSM Author-Reported Disclosures and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(4):969-976. doi: 10.1177/0363546517750124. Epub 2018 Jan 30. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29382212
-
Sunshine Act: shedding light on inaccurate disclosures at a gynecologic annual meeting.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):661.e1-661.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jun 16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27319366 Free PMC article.
-
Inconsistencies Between Physician-Reported Disclosures at the AAOS Annual Meeting and Industry-Reported Financial Disclosures in the Open Payments Database.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 19;98(20):e90. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01119. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016. PMID: 27869631 Review.
-
Letting the sunshine in: shining a new light on physician-industry relationships.J Neurointerv Surg. 2010 Mar;2(1):80-2. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2010.002196. J Neurointerv Surg. 2010. PMID: 21990565 Review.
Cited by
-
Potential conflicts of interest of editorial board members from five leading spine journals.PLoS One. 2015 Jun 4;10(6):e0127362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127362. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26042410 Free PMC article.
-
Contemporary Analysis of Inconsistencies Between Physician-reported Disclosures at the AAOS Annual Meeting and Industry-reported Financial Disclosures in the Open Payments Database.J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022 Jul 6;6(7):e22.00048. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00048. eCollection 2022 Jul 1. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022. PMID: 35794724 Free PMC article.
-
A Closer Look at the Relationship Between Industry and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgeons.Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jan 22;7(1):2325967118823175. doi: 10.1177/2325967118823175. eCollection 2019 Jan. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 30733974 Free PMC article.
-
Lessons from the infuse trials: do we need a classification of bias in scientific publications and editorials?Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014 Sep;7(3):193-9. doi: 10.1007/s12178-014-9223-1. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014. PMID: 24878967 Free PMC article.
-
Industry Payments to Foot and Ankle Surgeons and Their Effect on Total Ankle Arthroplasty Outcomes.Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021 Sep 14;6(3):24730114211034519. doi: 10.1177/24730114211034519. eCollection 2021 Jul. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021. PMID: 35097468 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources