Gene expression classification of colon cancer into molecular subtypes: characterization, validation, and prognostic value
- PMID: 23700391
- PMCID: PMC3660251
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001453
Gene expression classification of colon cancer into molecular subtypes: characterization, validation, and prognostic value
Abstract
Background: Colon cancer (CC) pathological staging fails to accurately predict recurrence, and to date, no gene expression signature has proven reliable for prognosis stratification in clinical practice, perhaps because CC is a heterogeneous disease. The aim of this study was to establish a comprehensive molecular classification of CC based on mRNA expression profile analyses.
Methods and findings: Fresh-frozen primary tumor samples from a large multicenter cohort of 750 patients with stage I to IV CC who underwent surgery between 1987 and 2007 in seven centers were characterized for common DNA alterations, including BRAF, KRAS, and TP53 mutations, CpG island methylator phenotype, mismatch repair status, and chromosomal instability status, and were screened with whole genome and transcriptome arrays. 566 samples fulfilled RNA quality requirements. Unsupervised consensus hierarchical clustering applied to gene expression data from a discovery subset of 443 CC samples identified six molecular subtypes. These subtypes were associated with distinct clinicopathological characteristics, molecular alterations, specific enrichments of supervised gene expression signatures (stem cell phenotype-like, normal-like, serrated CC phenotype-like), and deregulated signaling pathways. Based on their main biological characteristics, we distinguished a deficient mismatch repair subtype, a KRAS mutant subtype, a cancer stem cell subtype, and three chromosomal instability subtypes, including one associated with down-regulated immune pathways, one with up-regulation of the Wnt pathway, and one displaying a normal-like gene expression profile. The classification was validated in the remaining 123 samples plus an independent set of 1,058 CC samples, including eight public datasets. Furthermore, prognosis was analyzed in the subset of stage II-III CC samples. The subtypes C4 and C6, but not the subtypes C1, C2, C3, and C5, were independently associated with shorter relapse-free survival, even after adjusting for age, sex, stage, and the emerging prognostic classifier Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay recurrence score (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1, p = 0.0097). However, a limitation of this study is that information on tumor grade and number of nodes examined was not available.
Conclusions: We describe the first, to our knowledge, robust transcriptome-based classification of CC that improves the current disease stratification based on clinicopathological variables and common DNA markers. The biological relevance of these subtypes is illustrated by significant differences in prognosis. This analysis provides possibilities for improving prognostic models and therapeutic strategies. In conclusion, we report a new classification of CC into six molecular subtypes that arise through distinct biological pathways.
Conflict of interest statement
YP gave expert advice to Coloplast (France) for less than 1,000 euros last year. The other authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Molecular markers identify subtypes of stage III colon cancer associated with patient outcomes.Gastroenterology. 2015 Jan;148(1):88-99. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.09.041. Epub 2014 Oct 8. Gastroenterology. 2015. PMID: 25305506 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prognostic and predictive value of a microRNA signature in stage II colon cancer: a microRNA expression analysis.Lancet Oncol. 2013 Dec;14(13):1295-306. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70491-1. Epub 2013 Nov 13. Lancet Oncol. 2013. PMID: 24239208
-
Identification of a poor-prognosis BRAF-mutant-like population of patients with colon cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 20;30(12):1288-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5814. Epub 2012 Mar 5. J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22393095
-
What We Know About Stage II and III Colon Cancer: It's Still Not Enough.Target Oncol. 2017 Jun;12(3):265-275. doi: 10.1007/s11523-017-0494-5. Target Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28504299 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolving role of gene expression signatures as biomarkers in early-stage colon cancer.J Gastrointest Cancer. 2014 Dec;45(4):399-404. doi: 10.1007/s12029-014-9634-7. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24989938 Review.
Cited by
-
Identification and Validation of an m6A-Related LncRNA Signature to Predict Progression-Free Survival in Colorectal Cancer.Pathol Oncol Res. 2022 Aug 11;28:1610536. doi: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610536. eCollection 2022. Pathol Oncol Res. 2022. PMID: 36032659 Free PMC article.
-
Unique clinicopathologic and genetic alteration features in early onset colorectal carcinoma compared with age-related colorectal carcinoma: a large cohort next generation sequence analysis.Hum Pathol. 2020 Nov;105:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Sep 9. Hum Pathol. 2020. PMID: 32916163 Free PMC article.
-
Targeting the TGF-β Signaling Axis in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Where Do We Stand?Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 4;24(23):17101. doi: 10.3390/ijms242317101. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 38069421 Free PMC article.
-
A multidimensional network approach reveals microRNAs as determinants of the mesenchymal colorectal cancer subtype.Oncogene. 2016 Nov 17;35(46):6026-6037. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.134. Epub 2016 May 9. Oncogene. 2016. PMID: 27157610 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic implications of metabolism-associated gene signatures in colorectal cancer.PeerJ. 2020 Sep 2;8:e9847. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9847. eCollection 2020. PeerJ. 2020. PMID: 32953273 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA (2000) Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 50: 7–33. - PubMed
-
- American Joint Committee on Cancer (1997) AJCC cancer staging manual, 5th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
-
- Popat S, Hubner R, Houlston RS (2005) Systematic review of microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol 23: 609–618. - PubMed
-
- Hutchins G, Southward K, Handley K, Magill L, Beaumont C, et al. (2011) Value of mismatch repair, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in predicting recurrence and benefits from chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 29: 1261–1270. - PubMed
-
- Wang Y, Jatkoe T, Zhang Y, Mutch MG, Talantov D, et al. (2004) Gene expression profiles and molecular markers to predict recurrence of Dukes' B colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 22: 1564–1571. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous