Differences between self-reported and verified adverse cardiovascular events in a randomised clinical trial
- PMID: 23512838
- PMCID: PMC3612743
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002334
Differences between self-reported and verified adverse cardiovascular events in a randomised clinical trial
Abstract
Objectives: In clinical trials, adverse events are usually self-reported but may be adjudicated if serious or of particular interest. After adjudicating cardiovascular events for a 5-year calcium supplement trial, we observed discrepancies between self-reported and verified events. We systematically analysed those differences to assess their importance.
Design: Secondary analysis of adverse cardiovascular events in a 5-year, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of calcium supplementation (1 g calcium daily) in 1471 postmenopausal women (mean age 74 years).
Setting: Clinical research centre.
Methods: The participant's medical records were reviewed for all self-reported myocardial infarctions (MIs) or strokes, and the event independently adjudicated. Cause of death was obtained from hospital records or death certificates. To identify unreported events, the national hospital discharge database was searched and related hospital records were reviewed.
Results: 45 women reported 64 MIs, of which 33 (52%) were verified after adjudication. An additional 25 MIs were identified: 1 during adjudication of other events, 21 from the hospital discharge database, 3 from death certificates. 68 women reported 86 strokes of which 50 (58%) were verified. An additional 13 strokes were identified: 7 during adjudication of reported transient ischaemic attacks, 5 from the hospital discharge database, 1 from death certificates. Therefore, 43% of verified MIs and 21% of verified strokes were not reported to investigators. For non-adjudicated discharge codes, 10% of MIs and 22% of strokes were not verified after adjudication. Nineteen per cent of verified MIs and 27% of verified strokes were not identified in discharge coding or death certificates. Neither the event source nor the level of adjudication altered the relationship between treatment allocation and cardiovascular events.
Conclusions: When adverse event accuracy is critical, researchers should consider adjudicating self-reported events and hospital discharge codes, and attempt to identify unreported events.
Trial registration: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials registry: ACTRN 012605000242628.
Similar articles
-
Vascular events in healthy older women receiving calcium supplementation: randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2008 Feb 2;336(7638):262-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39440.525752.BE. Epub 2008 Jan 15. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18198394 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Adjudication of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: SUMMIT trial.Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):430-436. doi: 10.1177/1740774520920897. Epub 2020 May 22. Clin Trials. 2020. PMID: 32441114 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of cardiovascular clinical events and impact of event adjudication on the treatment effect of darapladib versus placebo in patients with stable coronary heart disease: Insights from the STABILITY trial.Am Heart J. 2019 Feb;208:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Nov 7. Am Heart J. 2019. PMID: 30572273 Clinical Trial.
-
Calcium supplementation commencing before or early in pregnancy, or food fortification with calcium, for preventing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 26;9(9):CD011192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011192.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 16;9:CD011192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011192.pub3. PMID: 28949421 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Single Technology Assessment of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. PMID: 29553663 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Calcium Supplements and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.Nutrients. 2021 Jan 26;13(2):368. doi: 10.3390/nu13020368. Nutrients. 2021. PMID: 33530332 Free PMC article.
-
Verifying participant-reported clinical outcomes: challenges and implications.Trials. 2020 Mar 4;21(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4169-7. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32131888 Free PMC article.
-
Agreement between self-reported and register-based cardiovascular events among Danish breast cancer survivors.J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Feb;12(1):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0648-6. Epub 2017 Sep 29. J Cancer Surviv. 2018. PMID: 28963606 Free PMC article.
-
Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol.BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 15;9(10):e025556. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025556. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31619413 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of central adjudication of outcomes and onsite outcome assessment on treatment effect estimates.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 10;3(3):MR000043. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000043.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 26961577 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Harlow SD, Linet MS. Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records. The evidence for accuracy of recall. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:233–48 - PubMed
-
- St Sauver JL, Hagen PT, Cha SS, et al. Agreement between patient reports of cardiovascular disease and patient medical records. Mayo Clin Proc 2005;80:203–10 - PubMed
-
- Reid IR, Mason B, Horne A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of calcium in healthy older women. Am J Med 2006;119:777–85 - PubMed
-
- Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, et al. Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:959–69 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources