Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;24(4):675-84.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-013-0146-8. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

Consumption of dairy and meat in relation to breast cancer risk in the Black Women's Health Study

Affiliations

Consumption of dairy and meat in relation to breast cancer risk in the Black Women's Health Study

Jeanine M Genkinger et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Dairy and meat consumption may impact breast cancer risk through modification of hormones (e.g., estrogen), through specific nutrients (e.g., vitamin D), or through products formed in processing/cooking (e.g., heterocyclic amines). Results relating meat and dairy intake to breast cancer risk have been conflicting. Thus, we examined the risk of breast cancer in relation to intake of dairy and meat in a large prospective cohort study.

Methods: In the Black Women's Health Study, 1,268 incident breast cancer cases were identified among 52,062 women during 12 years of follow-up. Multivariable (MV) relative risks (RRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Null associations were observed for total milk (MV RR = 1.05, 95 % CI 0.74-1.46 comparing ≥1,000-0 g/week) and total meat (MV RR = 1.04, 95 % CI 0.85-1.28 comparing ≥1,000 < 400 g/week) intake and risk of breast cancer. Associations with intakes of specific types of dairy, specific types of meat, and dietary calcium and vitamin D were also null. The associations were not modified by reproductive (e.g., parity) or lifestyle factors (e.g., smoking). Associations with estrogen receptor (ER) positive (+), ER negative (-), progesterone receptor (PR) +, PR-, ER+/PR+, and ER-/PR- breast cancer were generally null.

Conclusions: This analysis of African-American women provides little support for associations of dairy and meat intake with breast cancer risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. American Cancer Society; Atlanta, GA: 2012.
    1. Honegger A, Humbel RE. Insulin-like growth factors I and II in fetal and adult bovine serum. Purification, primary structures, and immunological cross-reactivities. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:569–575. - PubMed
    1. Zapf J, Froesch ER, Humbel RE. The insulin-like growth factors (IGF) of human serum: chemical and biological characterization and aspects of their possible physiological role. Curr Top Cell Regul. 1981;19:257–309. - PubMed
    1. Outwater JL, Nicholson A, Barnard N. Dairy products and breast cancer: the IGF-I, estrogen, and bGH hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 1997;48:453–461. - PubMed
    1. Cui Y, Rohan TE. Vitamin D, calcium, and breast cancer risk: a review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1427–1437. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances