Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 9:3:419.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00419. eCollection 2012.

Selection of binding targets in parasites using phage-display and aptamer libraries in vivo and in vitro

Affiliations

Selection of binding targets in parasites using phage-display and aptamer libraries in vivo and in vitro

R R Tonelli et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Parasite infections are largely dependent on interactions between pathogen and different host cell populations to guarantee a successful infectious process. This is particularly true for obligatory intracellular parasites as Plasmodium, Toxoplasma, and Leishmania, to name a few. Adhesion to and entry into the cell are essential steps requiring specific parasite and host cell molecules. The large amount of possible involved molecules poses additional difficulties for their identification by the classical biochemical approaches. In this respect, the search for alternative techniques should be pursued. Among them two powerful methodologies can be employed, both relying upon the construction of highly diverse combinatorial libraries of peptides or oligonucleotides that randomly bind with high affinity to targets on the cell surface and are selectively displaced by putative ligands. These are, respectively, the peptide-based phage display and the oligonucleotide-based aptamer techniques. The phage display technique has been extensively employed for the identification of novel ligands in vitro and in vivo in different areas such as cancer, vaccine development, and epitope mapping. Particularly, phage display has been employed in the investigation of pathogen-host interactions. Although this methodology has been used for some parasites with encouraging results, in trypanosomatids its use is, as yet, scanty. RNA and DNA aptamers, developed by the SELEX process (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment), were described over two decades ago and since then contributed to a large number of structured nucleic acids for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes or for the understanding of the cell biology. Similarly to the phage display technique scarce use of the SELEX process has been used in the probing of parasite-host interaction. In this review, an overall survey on the use of both phage display and aptamer technologies in different pathogenic organisms will be discussed. Using these techniques, recent results on the interaction of Trypanosoma cruzi with the host will be highlighted focusing on members of the 85 kDa protein family, a subset of the gp85/TS superfamily.

Keywords: Kinetoplastidae; SELEX; apicomplexa; aptamers; combinatorial methods for diagnosis and therapy; phage display.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Parasite targetting by combinatorial techniques. (A) Phage display. A phage library displaying potential ligand proteins on their surface is exposed to an immobilized target (step 1). After washing away unbound phages (step 2), binders are eluted by Escherichia coli infection and plated on LB-agar (step 3). Clones are then amplified producing a phage mixture that is enriched with relevant (i.e., binding) phage (step 4). The repeated cycling of these steps is referred as “panning”. At the end of 3–4 rounds of panning the enriched phage population is recovered by infection of a suitable bacterial host and sequenced to identify the interacting peptides or protein fragments. (B) SELEX. It is based on a stretch of single-stranded nucleic acid, which can be RNA or single-stranded DNA (ss-DNA). These are chemically synthesized to have a random stretch usually from 8 to 40 nucleotides, flanked by constant sequences. In the case of RNA SELEX, the synthetic DNA template is transcribed into a pool of 1013–1014 different RNA molecules (step 1). The pool is incubated with the desired targets and due to the sample diversity some of the aptamers will bind to their targets (step 2). After washing out unbound RNAs (step 3) the different RNA pools are displaced by incubation with ligands of interest (step 4). By reverse transcription (step 5) and PCR amplification (step 6) selected double-stranded DNAs are reconstructed. The same cycle is repeated over 8–12 times until purified sequences specific for a given ligand are selected. The DNAs are cloned and sequenced. This iterative method follows the same logic when single-stranded DNA sequences are used as aptamers instead of RNA (Ulrich and Wrenger, 2009).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abi-Ghanem D., Waghela S., Caldwell D., Danforth H., Berghman L. (2008). Phage display selection and characterization of single-chain recombinant antibodies against Eimeria tenella sporozoites. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 121, 58–67 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.08.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adler A., Forster N., Homann M., Goringer H. (2008). Post-SELEX chemical optimization of a trypanosome-specific RNA aptamer. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 11, 16–23 10.2174/138620708783398331 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahmadvand D., Rahbarizadeh F., Moghimi S. (2011). Biological targeting and innovative therapeutic interventions with phage-displayed peptides and structured nucleic acids (aptamers). Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 832–838 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.02.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aley S., Sherwood J., Howard R. (1984). Knob-positive and knob-negative Plasmodium falciparum differ in expression of a strain-specific malarial antigen on the surface of infected erythrocytes. J. Exp. Med. 160, 1585–1590 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alvarez P., Leguizamon M. S., Buscaglia C. A., Pitcovsky T. A., Campetella O. (2001). Multiple overlapping epitopes in the repetitive unit of the shed acute-phase antigen from Trypanosoma cruzi enhance Its immunogenic properties. Infect. Immun. 69, 7946–7949 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7946-7949.2001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources