Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 9:8:6.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-6.

Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results

Shaun Treweek  1 , Andrew D Oxman, Philip Alderson, Patrick M Bossuyt, Linn Brandt, Jan Brożek, Marina Davoli, Signe Flottorp, Robin Harbour, Suzanne Hill, Alessandro Liberati, Helena Liira, Holger J Schünemann, Sarah Rosenbaum, Judith Thornton, Per Olav Vandvik, Pablo Alonso-Coello; DECIDE Consortium
Collaborators, Affiliations

Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results

Shaun Treweek et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Healthcare decision makers face challenges when using guidelines, including understanding the quality of the evidence or the values and preferences upon which recommendations are made, which are often not clear.

Methods: GRADE is a systematic approach towards assessing the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations in healthcare. GRADE also gives advice on how to go from evidence to decisions. It has been developed to address the weaknesses of other grading systems and is now widely used internationally. The Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE) consortium (http://www.decide-collaboration.eu/), which includes members of the GRADE Working Group and other partners, will explore methods to ensure effective communication of evidence-based recommendations targeted at key stakeholders: healthcare professionals, policymakers, and managers, as well as patients and the general public. Surveys and interviews with guideline producers and other stakeholders will explore how presentation of the evidence could be improved to better meet their information needs. We will collect further stakeholder input from advisory groups, via consultations and user testing; this will be done across a wide range of healthcare systems in Europe, North America, and other countries. Targeted communication strategies will be developed, evaluated in randomized trials, refined, and assessed during the development of real guidelines.

Discussion: Results of the DECIDE project will improve the communication of evidence-based healthcare recommendations. Building on the work of the GRADE Working Group, DECIDE will develop and evaluate methods that address communication needs of guideline users. The project will produce strategies for communicating recommendations that have been rigorously evaluated in diverse settings, and it will support the transfer of research into practice in healthcare systems globally.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simplified flow diagram of how the three phases of DECIDE will work.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The iterative nature of the DECIDE strategy development process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prototype of a DECIDE communication strategy for health professionals.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Poolman RW, Sierevelt IN, Farrokhyar F, Mazel JA, Blankevoort L, Bhandari M. Perceptions and competence in evidence-based medicine: are surgeons getting better? a questionnaire survey of members of the Dutch orthopaedic association. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:206–215. - PubMed
    1. Coleman P, Nicholl J. Influence of evidence-based guidance on health policy and clinical practice in England. Qual Saf Health Care. 2001;10:229–237. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100229. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Vito C, Nobile CG, Furnari G, Pavia M, De Giusti M, Angelillo IF, Villari P. Physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and professional use of RCTs and meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey. Eur J Public Health. 2009;19:297–302. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn134. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Assembly. Resolution on health research. 2005. http://www.who.int/rpc/meetings/58th_WHA_resolution.pdf.
    1. Domenighetti G, Grilli R, Liberati A. Promoting consumers' demand for evidence-based medicine. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998;14:97–105. doi: 10.1017/S0266462300010552. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources