Neutropenia-associated outcomes in adults with acute myeloid leukemia receiving cytarabine consolidation chemotherapy with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
- PMID: 23208834
- DOI: 10.1002/phar.1150
Neutropenia-associated outcomes in adults with acute myeloid leukemia receiving cytarabine consolidation chemotherapy with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
Abstract
Study objective: To determine whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis after consolidation with high- or intermediate-dose cytarabine (H/IDAC) for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) reduces the frequency of neutropenia-associated complications.
Design: Retrospective medical record review.
Setting: Academic medical center.
Patients: Seventy-eight patients aged 18 years or older in whom H/IDAC consolidation chemotherapy was initiated for consolidation of AML between November 2004 and November 2010.
Measurements and main results: Patient demographic data, information on the hospitalization for consolidation, data on G-CSF use after H/IDAC chemotherapy, and details on any readmissions were collected. Patients were deemed to have received G-CSF prophylaxis if there was documentation of the intent for use of either filgrastim or pegfilgrastim. Outcome data also were collected, including dates of relapse or second induction treatment course, and death or last follow-up visit. We compared data based on patient receipt of G-CSF (G-CSF vs no G-CSF) after each chemotherapy cycle. We assessed differences in the duration of hospitalization, fever, intravenous antibiotic use, and neutropenia, as well as rate of documented infections, time to disease recurrence, and overall survival. Compared with no G-CSF, use of G-CSF after cycle 1 of H/IDAC significantly reduced the rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (p=0.039); however, no significant differences were noted for subsequent cycles. No significant differences were seen in duration of hospitalization, rate of documented infections, or time to treatment failure between groups. Overall survival was longer for patients who received G-CSF during their first cycle (p=0.018) and for those who received G-CSF during any of their cycles (p=0.04).
Conclusion: Use of G-CSF prophylaxis after cycle 1 of H/IDAC consolidation for AML appears to reduce the frequency of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia and to increase overall survival compared with no G-CSF use. Prospective, controlled studies are needed to support our findings.
© 2012 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
Comment in
-
Prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine for acute myeloid leukemia.Expert Rev Hematol. 2013 Apr;6(2):131-3. doi: 10.1586/ehm.13.10. Expert Rev Hematol. 2013. PMID: 23547862
Similar articles
-
Intensive consolidation with G-CSF support: Tolerability, safety, reduced hospitalization, and efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia patients ≥60 years.Am J Hematol. 2017 Oct;92(10):E567-E574. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24847. Epub 2017 Aug 17. Am J Hematol. 2017. PMID: 28699225 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after intensive consolidation chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia: results of a randomized trial of the Groupe Ouest-Est Leucémies Aigues Myeloblastiques.J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(4):780-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.4.780. J Clin Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10673519 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jan;27(1):79-86. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.536527. Epub 2010 Nov 22. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011. PMID: 21091127
-
2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours.Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jan;47(1):8-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.013. Epub 2010 Nov 20. Eur J Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21095116
-
New perspectives in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia by hematopoietic growth factors.Semin Oncol. 1994 Dec;21(6 Suppl 16):33-8. Semin Oncol. 1994. PMID: 7528449 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and Safety of Filgrastim and Its Biosimilars to Prevent Febrile Neutropenia in Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study and Meta-Analysis.Biology (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;10(10):1069. doi: 10.3390/biology10101069. Biology (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34681169 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF after induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan society of clinical oncology.Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 May;29(5):535-544. doi: 10.1007/s10147-023-02465-0. Epub 2024 Mar 18. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38494578 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of pegylated filgrastim in comparison to filgrastim for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) on high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) consolidation chemotherapy.Support Care Cancer. 2015 Mar;23(3):643-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2417-7. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Support Care Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25160495 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Use and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice:a retrospective observational study.BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6010-9. BMC Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31399079 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Using Empiric Glycopeptides in Accordance with the IDSA Guidelines in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with Febrile Neutropenia.Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2022 May 1;14(1):e2022039. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2022.039. eCollection 2022. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35615332 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical