Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Dec;97(12):4769-79.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2794. Epub 2012 Sep 26.

Metabolic effects of a growth hormone-releasing factor in obese subjects with reduced growth hormone secretion: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Metabolic effects of a growth hormone-releasing factor in obese subjects with reduced growth hormone secretion: a randomized controlled trial

Hideo Makimura et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Context: Obesity is associated with reduced GH secretion and increased cardiovascular disease risk.

Objective: We performed this study to determine the effects of augmenting endogenous GH secretion on body composition and cardiovascular disease risk indices in obese subjects with reduced GH secretion.

Design, patients and methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed involving 60 abdominally obese subjects with reduced GH secretion. Subjects received tesamorelin, a GHRH(1-44) analog, 2 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 months. Abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) was assessed by abdominal computed tomography scan, and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) was assessed by ultrasound. Treatment effect was determined by longitudinal linear mixed-effects modeling.

Results: VAT [-16 ± 9 vs.19 ± 9 cm(2), tesamorelin vs. placebo; treatment effect (95% confidence interval): -35 (-58, -12) cm(2); P = 0.003], cIMT (-0.03 ± 0.01 vs. 0.01 ± 0.01 mm; -0.04 (-0.07, -0.01) mm; P = 0.02), log C-reactive protein (-0.17 ± 0.04 vs. -0.03 ± 0.05 mg/liter; -0.15 (-0.30, -0.01) mg/liter, P = 0.04), and triglycerides (-26 ± 16 vs. 12 ± 8 mg/dl; -37 (-67, -7) mg/dl; P = 0.02) improved significantly in the tesamorelin group vs. placebo. No significant effects on abdominal sc adipose tissue (-6 ± 6 vs. 3 ± 11 cm(2); -10 (-32, +13) cm(2); P = 0.40) were seen. IGF-I increased (86 ± 21 vs. -6 ± 8 μg/liter; 92 (+52, +132) μg/liter; P < 0.0001). No changes in fasting, 2-h glucose, or glycated hemoglobin were seen. There were no serious adverse events or differences in adverse events between the groups.

Conclusion: Among obese subjects with relative reductions in GH, tesamorelin selectively reduces VAT without significant effects on sc adipose tissue and improves triglycerides, C-reactive protein, and cIMT, without aggravating glucose.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00675506.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Enrollment and outcomes. FOBT, Fecal occult blood test.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Effects of tesamorelin vs. placebo on IGF-I (A), abdominal VAT area (B), and cIMT (C). Panel A demonstrates the change in IGF-I from baseline over time in tesamorelin vs. placebo. Each point represents mean ± sem of IGF-I in each study group at baseline, 2 wk, and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Although IGF-I levels at baseline were similar between the two groups (P = 0.17), IGF-I levels at all subsequent time points were significantly different between each group (P < 0.05 at each time point) with overall P < 0.0001 by longitudinal linear mixed-effects modeling. Panel B demonstrates the difference in VAT between treatment groups with tesamorelin demonstrating a net −19% improvement in VAT compared with placebo. Panel C demonstrates the differences in cIMT between treatment groups with tesamorelin demonstrating a net −6% improvement in cIMT compared with placebo. The T bars in B and C denote the se. Statistical significance was determined by longitudinal linear mixed-effects modeling with the last value carried forward for both B and C.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Després JP, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Bouchard C. 1990. Regional distribution of body fat, plasma lipoproteins, and cardiovascular disease. Arteriosclerosis 10:497–511 - PubMed
    1. Nguyen-Duy TB, Nichaman MZ, Church TS, Blair SN, Ross R. 2003. Visceral fat and liver fat are independent predictors of metabolic risk factors in men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284:E1065–E1071 - PubMed
    1. Lemieux I, Pascot A, Prud'homme D, Alméras N, Bogaty P, Nadeau A, Bergeron J, Després JP. 2001. Elevated C-reactive protein: another component of the atherothrombotic profile of abdominal obesity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21:961–967 - PubMed
    1. Lear SA, Humphries KH, Kohli S, Frohlich JJ, Birmingham CL, Mancini GB. 2007. Visceral adipose tissue, a potential risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis: results of the Multicultural Community Health Assessment Trial (M-CHAT). Stroke 38:2422–2429 - PubMed
    1. Fujimoto WY, Bergstrom RW, Boyko EJ, Chen KW, Leonetti DL, Newell-Morris L, Shofer JB, Wahl PW. 1999. Visceral adiposity and incident coronary heart disease in Japanese-American men. The 10-year follow-up results of the Seattle Japanese-American Community Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 22:1808–1812 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data