Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 17:2:90.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00090. eCollection 2012.

Regulatory T cells in radiotherapeutic responses

Affiliations

Regulatory T cells in radiotherapeutic responses

Dörthe Schaue et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) can extend its influence in cancer therapy beyond what can be attributed to in-field cytotoxicity by modulating the immune system. While complex, these systemic effects can help tip the therapeutic balance in favor of treatment success or failure. Engagement of the immune system is generally through recognition of damage-associated molecules expressed or released as a result of tumor and normal tissue radiation damage. This system has evolved to discriminate pathological from physiological forms of cell death by signaling "danger." The multiple mechanisms that can be evoked include a shift toward a pro-inflammatory, pro-oxidant microenvironment that can promote maturation of dendritic cells and, in cancer treatment, the development of effector T cell responses to tumor-associated antigens. Control over these processes is exerted by regulatory T cells (Tregs), suppressor macrophages, and immunosuppressive cytokines that act in consort to maintain tolerance to self, limit tissue damage, and re-establish tissue homeostasis. Unfortunately, by the time RT for cancer is initiated the tumor-host relationship has already been sculpted in favor of tumor growth and against immune-mediated mechanisms for tumor regression. Reversing this situation is a major challenge. However, recent data show that removal of Tregs can tip the balance in favor of the generation of radiation-induced anti-tumor immunity. The clinical challenge is to do so without excessive depletion that might precipitate serious autoimmune reactions and increase the likelihood of normal tissue complications. The selective modulation of Treg biology to maintain immune tolerance and control of normal tissue damage, while releasing the "brakes" on anti-tumor immune responses, is a worthy aim with promise for enhancing the therapeutic benefit of RT for cancer.

Keywords: Tregs; danger; radiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Systemic immune control is exerted through the combined effort of thymically derived, naturally occurring nTregs, and peripherally induced iTregs that have specificity for “self” antigens but with distinct, minimally overlapping TCR repertoires. Both Treg pools depend heavily on the transcription factor FoxP3 and on IL-2 with TGF-β providing additional stimulation. While both Treg subsets contribute to immune suppression, iTregs seem to be selectively involved in mucosal surfaces. Radiation therapy drives an increase in Tregs that may limit potential anti-tumor immunity and aid tumor escape on one side but that may also nurture normal tissue recovery on the other.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahn G. O., Tseng D., Liao C. H., Dorie M. J., Czechowicz A., Brown J. M. (2010). Inhibition of Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) enhances tumor response to radiation by reducing myeloid cell recruitment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 8363–836810.1073/pnas.0911378107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Apetoh L., Ghiringhelli F., Tesniere A., Obeid M., Ortiz C., Criollo A., Mignot G., Maiuri M. C., Ullrich E., Saulnier P., Yang H., Amigorena S., Ryffel B., Barrat F. J., Saftig P., Levi F., Lidereau R., Nogues C., Mira J. P., Chompret A., Joulin V., Clavel-Chapelon F., Bourhis J., Andre F., Delaloge S., Tursz T., Kroemer G., Zitvogel L. (2007). Toll-like receptor 4-dependent contribution of the immune system to anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Nat. Med. 13, 1050–105910.1038/nm1622 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apostolou I., von Boehmer H. (2004). In vivo instruction of suppressor commitment in naive T cells. J. Exp. Med. 199, 1401–140810.1084/jem.20040249 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Awwad M., North R. J. (1989). Cyclophosphamide-induced immunologically mediated regression of a cyclophosphamide-resistant murine tumor: a consequence of eliminating precursor L3T4+ suppressor T-cells. Cancer Res. 49, 1649–1654 - PubMed
    1. Banchereau J., Steinman R. M. (1998). Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392, 245–25210.1038/32588 - DOI - PubMed