Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 21:12:149.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-149.

Unique expression, processing regulation, and regulatory network of peach (Prunus persica) miRNAs

Affiliations

Unique expression, processing regulation, and regulatory network of peach (Prunus persica) miRNAs

Hong Zhu et al. BMC Plant Biol. .

Abstract

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have recently emerged as important gene regulators in plants. MiRNAs and their targets have been extensively studied in Arabidopsis and rice. However, relatively little is known about the characterization of miRNAs and their target genes in peach (Prunus persica), which is a complex crop with unique developmental programs.

Results: We performed small RNA deep sequencing and identified 47 peach-specific and 47 known miRNAs or families with distinct expression patterns. Together, the identified miRNAs targeted 80 genes, many of which have not been reported previously. Like the model plant systems, peach has two of the three conserved trans-acting siRNA biogenesis pathways with similar mechanistic features and target specificity. Unique to peach, three of the miRNAs collectively target 49 MYBs, 19 of which are known to regulate phenylpropanoid metabolism, a key pathway associated with stone hardening and fruit color development, highlighting a critical role of miRNAs in the regulation of peach fruit development and ripening. We also found that the majority of the miRNAs were differentially regulated in different tissues, in part due to differential processing of miRNA precursors. Up to 16% of the peach-specific miRNAs were differentially processed from their precursors in a tissue specific fashion, which has been rarely observed in plant cells. The miRNA precursor processing activity appeared not to be coupled with its transcriptional activity but rather acted independently in peach.

Conclusions: Collectively, the data characterizes the unique expression pattern and processing regulation of peach miRNAs and demonstrates the presence of a complex, multi-level miRNA regulatory network capable of targeting a wide variety of biological functions, including phenylpropanoid pathways which play a multifaceted spatial-temporal role in peach fruit development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Length distribution of redundant and unique sRNA sequences. (a-d) The percentage of each size sRNA sequence (17~28-nt) in root, leaf, flower, and fruit is similar. The data is further grouped by whether the sequences are redundant or unique and by whether they align to the peach genome. (e-f) The data from (a-d) is summarized to represent the length distribution of redundant and unique sRNAs in root, leaf, flower, and fruit. In all cases, the 24-nt is the predominant sRNA species and the 21-nt is the next most abundant.
Figure 2
Figure 2
RNA blot analysis of miRNA expression. (a) The expression profiles of three molecules for normalizing gel loading were used to determine the one most uniformly expressed in the seven different RNA samples. MiR172 was chosen as the loading control throughout all RNA blots in this study instead of peach U6 because the U6 proved to be expressed at a substantially lower level in the ripest fruit tissue in these experiments. (b-c) The expression of selected previously-known and peach-specific miRNAs in different peach tissues. All hybridization results from the same membrane are grouped. 25 μg of total RNA isolated from each tissue was separated, transferred to nylon membranes and hybridized using γ32P-labeled oligo probe complimentary to RNA marker sequence and along with the probe to the indicated miRNA or gene sequence. For all the blots shown, L, leaf; F, flower; Fr-I, fruit at 19 Day After Bloom (DAB); Fr-II, fruit at 40 DAB; Fr-III, fruit at 82 DAB; R, root; B, bark.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Detection of differential miRNA processing and expression. Two sets of membranes were prepared as described in Figure 2. Each membrane was sequentially probed with labeled RNA marker (RNA M) for size standards, probe complementary to a specific miRNA that shows incomplete processing, a 21-nt region immediately next to the specific miRNA sequence, a second miRNA that shows complete processing and then U6 as a standard. MiR172 was used as a loading control. (a-b) The expression of miRC1 and miRC26, respectively, showing incomplete processing. Based on the expression of the control RNA miR172, the processing efficiency is calculated and presented below the blots. APE, Arbitrary Processing Efficiency (%) = Small Fragment Intensity (SFI)*100/[Sum of Large Fragment Intensity (LFI) + SFI]. RTA, Relative Transcription Activity = (LFI + SFI)/Control RNA Fragment Intensity (CFI). (c-d) The diagram of the specifically probed sequence regions is shown. (e-f) The expression of precursors only is shown of miRC1 and miRC26, respectively. (g-h) The expression of miRC2 and miRC27 respectively is shown to demonstrate complete processing detected on the same blot. For all the blots shown, L, leaf; F, flower; Fr-I, fruit at 19 Day After Bloom (DAB); Fr-II, fruit at 40 DAB; Fr-III, fruit at 82 DAB; R, root; B, bark.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Two peach trans-acting siRNA biogenesis pathways. (a) The miR390-TAS3 biogenesis pathway, showing the dual miR390 target sites on the PpTAS3 transcript as denoted by red arrows. The number of sRNA sequences mapped along the PpTAS3 transcript is plotted for sense (black line) and antisense (red line) strands, with the position of two conserved tasiARFs indicated below. The phasing radial graph is represented next to this. Each spoke of the radial graph represents 1 of the 21 phasing registers, with the total number of sRNAs mapping to that register plotted as distance from the center. Grey dots indicate the specific registers predicted by 21-nt processing from the 5’ and 3’ cleavage sites. The tissue-specific accumulation of the phased siRNAs in fruit, flower, leaf and root is shown below the phasing graph. (b) The miR828-TAS4 biogenesis pathway, showing the miR828 cleavage site on the PpTAS4 transcript as denoted with a red arrow at the 5' end. The phasing graph and tissue-specific accumulation of the phased siRNAs are shown, as illustrated in (a). (c) Degradome confirmation of the cleavage of two peach ARF transcripts by TAS3-derived tasiARFs using t-plot with the red diamond and arrow indicating cleavage sites.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Three MiRNAs target 49 peach MYBs. (a) It was found that 49 MYBs were targeted by peach miR159, miR828 and miR858, some of which were targeted by more than one of the miRNAs. MiR858 targeted the majority of these MYBs. (b) Genomic organization of R2R3 MYB genes, location of target sites of miR159, miR828 and miR858, as well as a potential siRNA generation region. The highly conserved sequences are denoted by black area while the diverged sequence by gray box along the MYB coding regions. (c) Degradome confirmation of miR828 cleavage in three MYB transcripts. The red diamond and arrow indicate the cleavage site. (d) The tissue-specific accumulation of the phased siRNAs produced from the miR828-cleaved MYB transcripts is shown, as illustrated in Figure 4. (e) Phylogenetic analysis of functional relationship between miRNA-targeted peach R2R3 MYBs and the characterized Arabidopsis R2R3 MYBs according to previously work [39,40]. MYB genes targeted by specific miRNA are differentiated by the same colors, as illustrated in (a).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen XM. Small RNAs and Their Roles in Plant Development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009;25:21–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113417. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jinek M, Doudna JA. A three-dimensional view of the molecular machinery of RNA interference. Nature. 2009;457(7228):405–412. doi: 10.1038/nature07755. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen E, Howell MD. miRNAs in the biogenesis of trans-acting siRNAs in higher plants. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21(8):798–804. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.03.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Axtell MJ, Jan C, Rajagopalan R, Bartel DP. A two-hit trigger for siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2006;127(3):565–577. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lu C, Jeong DH, Kulkarni K, Pillay M, Nobuta K, German R, Thatcher SR, Maher C, Zhang L, Ware D. et al.Genome-wide analysis for discovery of rice microRNAs reveals natural antisense microRNAs (nat-miRNAs) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(12):4951–4956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708743105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms