Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Apr 26:344:e2718.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2718.

Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women

Eileen M Kesson et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the effect of multidisciplinary care on survival in women treated for breast cancer.

Design: Retrospective, comparative, non-randomised, interventional cohort study.

Setting: NHS hospitals, health boards in the west of Scotland, UK.

Participants: 14,358 patients diagnosed with symptomatic invasive breast cancer between 1990 and 2000, residing in health board areas in the west of Scotland. 13,722 (95.6%) patients were eligible (excluding 16 diagnoses of inflammatory cancers and 620 diagnoses of breast cancer at death).

Intervention: In 1995, multidisciplinary team working was introduced in hospitals throughout one health board area (Greater Glasgow; intervention area), but not in other health board areas in the west of Scotland (non-intervention area).

Main outcome measures: Breast cancer specific mortality and all cause mortality.

Results: Before the introduction of multidisciplinary care (analysed time period January 1990 to September 1995), breast cancer mortality was 11% higher in the intervention area than in the non-intervention area (hazard ratio adjusted for year of incidence, age at diagnosis, and deprivation, 1.11; 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.20). After multidisciplinary care was introduced (time period October 1995 to December 2000), breast cancer mortality was 18% lower in the intervention area than in the non-intervention area (0.82, 0.74 to 0.91). All cause mortality did not differ significantly between populations in the earlier period, but was 11% lower in the intervention area than in the non-interventional area in the later period (0.89, 0.82 to 0.97). Interrupted time series analyses showed a significant improvement in breast cancer survival in the intervention area in 1996, compared with the expected survival in the same year had the pre-intervention trend continued (P=0.004). This improvement was maintained after the intervention was introduced.

Conclusion: Introduction of multidisciplinary care was associated with improved survival and reduced variation in survival among hospitals. Further analysis of clinical audit data for multidisciplinary care could identify which aspects of care are most associated with survival benefits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: the authors have support from NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde health board (EMK, GMA), NHS Scotland (HJGB), and the University of Glasgow (WDG, DSM) for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Five year survival by year of incidence with trends before and after year 1995, by intervention area
None
Fig 2 Funnel plot of breast cancer survival at five years in study hospitals, by time period. Hospitals diagnosing fewer than 25 patients in each time period were excluded (of which more than 75% diagnosed fewer than three cases of breast cancer)

Comment in

Similar articles

  • The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire's breast cancer patients.
    Morris E, Haward RA, Gilthorpe MS, Craigs C, Forman D. Morris E, et al. Ann Oncol. 2008 Feb;19(2):284-91. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm432. Epub 2007 Sep 4. Ann Oncol. 2008. PMID: 17785759
  • The addition of internists to a breast health program.
    Battaglia TA, Howard MB, Kavanah M, Prout MN, Chapman C, David MM, McKinney R, Kronman A, Dumont T, Freund KM. Battaglia TA, et al. Breast J. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):58-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01179.x. Epub 2011 Nov 20. Breast J. 2012. PMID: 22098389
  • Breast cancer care: changing community standards.
    Butler WM, Cunningham JE, Bull D, Cupples T, Guerry P, Reynolds JC, Sweatman CA. Butler WM, et al. J Healthc Qual. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):22-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2004.tb00517.x. J Healthc Qual. 2004. PMID: 15468652
  • Management of primary breast cancer.
    Melville A, Liberati A, Grilli R, Sheldon T. Melville A, et al. Qual Health Care. 1996 Dec;5(4):250-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.4.250. Qual Health Care. 1996. PMID: 10164151 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
  • Improving outcomes for women aged 70 years or above with early breast cancer: research programme including a cluster RCT.
    Wyld L, Reed MWR, Collins K, Ward S, Holmes G, Morgan J, Bradburn M, Walters S, Burton M, Lifford K, Edwards A, Brain K, Ring A, Herbert E, Robinson TG, Martin C, Chater T, Pemberton K, Shrestha A, Nettleship A, Richards P, Brennan A, Cheung KL, Todd A, Harder H, Audisio R, Battisti NML, Wright J, Simcock R, Murray C, Thompson AM, Gosney M, Hatton M, Armitage F, Patnick J, Green T, Revill D, Gath J, Horgan K, Holcombe C, Winter M, Naik J, Parmeshwar R. Wyld L, et al. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2022 Jun. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2022 Jun. PMID: 35793425 Free Books & Documents. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Althuis MD, Dozier JM, Anderson WF, Devesa SS, Brinton LA. Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality 1973-1997. Int J Epidemiol April 2005;34:405-12. - PubMed
    1. Chu KC, Tarone RE, Kessler LG, Ries LAG, Hankey BF, Miller BA, et al. Recent trends in US breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1571-9. - PubMed
    1. Botha JL, Bray F, Sankila R, Parkin DM. Breast cancer incidence and mortality trends in 16 European countries. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1718-29. - PubMed
    1. Thomson CS, Brewster DH, Dewar JA, Twelves CJ. Improvements in survival for women with breast cancer in Scotland between 1987 and 1993: impact of earlier diagnosis and changes in treatment. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:743-53. - PubMed
    1. Brown SBF, Mallon EA, Edwards J, Campbell FM, McGlynn LM, Elsberger B, et al. Is the biology of breast cancer changing? A study of hormone receptor status 1984-1986 and 1996-1997. Br J Cancer 2009;100:807-10. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms