Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling
- PMID: 22508865
- DOI: 10.1177/0956797611430953
Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling
Abstract
Cases of clear scientific misconduct have received significant media attention recently, but less flagrantly questionable research practices may be more prevalent and, ultimately, more damaging to the academic enterprise. Using an anonymous elicitation format supplemented by incentives for honest reporting, we surveyed over 2,000 psychologists about their involvement in questionable research practices. The impact of truth-telling incentives on self-admissions of questionable research practices was positive, and this impact was greater for practices that respondents judged to be less defensible. Combining three different estimation methods, we found that the percentage of respondents who have engaged in questionable practices was surprisingly high. This finding suggests that some questionable practices may constitute the prevailing research norm.
Similar articles
-
Preparing whistleblowers for reporting research misconduct.Account Res. 2012;19(5):308-28. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2012.718683. Account Res. 2012. PMID: 23009270
-
Glory days or the lure of scientific misconduct.J Infor Ethics. 1996 Spring;5(1):9-14. J Infor Ethics. 1996. PMID: 11653392 No abstract available.
-
Dealing with misconduct in biomedical research: a review of the problems and the proposed methods for improvement.Account Res. 2009 Nov;16(6):307-30. doi: 10.1080/08989620903328576. Account Res. 2009. PMID: 19866380
-
Evolution of truth-telling attitudes and practices in Italy.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004 Dec;52(3):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.09.002. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004. PMID: 15582784 Review.
-
Experimental practices in economics: a methodological challenge for psychologists?Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Jun;24(3):383-403; discussion 403-51. doi: 10.1037/e683322011-032. Behav Brain Sci. 2001. PMID: 11682798 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving practices and inferences in developmental cognitive neuroscience.Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Oct;45:100807. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100807. Epub 2020 Jun 30. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32759026 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Confirming the appearance of excess success: Reply to van Boxtel and Koch (2016).Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):2010-2013. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1137-z. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016. PMID: 27562761
-
Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1631-1638. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1030-9. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016. PMID: 27068542 Free PMC article.
-
Skewness and Staging: Does the Floor Effect Induce Bias in Multilevel AR(1) Models?Multivariate Behav Res. 2024 Mar-Apr;59(2):289-319. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2023.2254769. Epub 2023 Dec 31. Multivariate Behav Res. 2024. PMID: 38160329 Free PMC article.
-
The significance fallacy in inferential statistics.BMC Res Notes. 2015 Mar 17;8:84. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1020-4. BMC Res Notes. 2015. PMID: 25888971 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
