[Simulation training in surgical education - application of virtual reality laparoscopic simulators in a surgical skills course]
- PMID: 22495487
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1283984
[Simulation training in surgical education - application of virtual reality laparoscopic simulators in a surgical skills course]
Abstract
Background: Training and simulation are gaining importance in surgical education. Today, virtual reality surgery simulators provide sophisticated laparoscopic training scenarios and offer detailed assessment methods. This also makes simulators interesting for the application in surgical skills courses. The aim of the current study was to assess the suitability of a virtual surgery simulator for training and assessment in an established surgical training course.
Materials and methods: The study was conducted during the annual "Practical Course for Visceral Surgery" (Warnemuende, Germany). 36 of 108 course participants were assigned at random for the study. Training was conducted in 15 sessions over 5 days with 4 identical virtual surgery simulators (LapSim) and 2 standardised training tasks. The simulator measured 16 individual parameters and calculated 2 scores. Questionnaires were used to assess the test persons' laparoscopic experience, their training situation and the acceptance of the simulator training. Data were analysed with non-parametric tests. A subgroup analysis for laparoscopic experience was conducted in order to assess the simulator's construct validity and assessment capabilities.
Results: Median age was 32 (27 - 41) years; median professional experience was 3 (1 - 11) years. Typical laparoscopic learning curves with initial significant improvements and a subsequent plateau phase were measured over 5 days. The individual training sessions exhibited a rhythmic variability in the training results. A shorter night's sleep led to a marked drop in performance. The participants' different experience levels could clearly be discriminated ( ≤ 20 vs. > 20 laparoscopic operations; p ≤ 0.001). The questionnaire showed that the majority of the participants had limited training opportunities in their hospitals. The simulator training was very well accepted. However, the participants severely misjudged the real costs of the simulators that were used.
Conclusions: The learning curve on the simulator was successfully mastered during the course. Construct validity could be demonstrated within the course setting. The simulator's assessment system can be of value for the assessment of laparoscopic training performance within surgical skills courses. Acceptance of the simulator training is high. However, simulators are currently too expensive to be used within a large training course.
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.J Surg Educ. 2011 Jul-Aug;68(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 May 4. J Surg Educ. 2011. PMID: 21708364 Clinical Trial.
-
Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):764-72. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y. World J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17361356 Free PMC article.
-
Objective evaluation of minimally invasive surgical skills for transplantation. Surgeons using a virtual reality simulator.Chirurgia (Bucur). 2009 Mar-Apr;104(2):181-5. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2009. PMID: 19499661
-
Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees?Am J Surg. 2010 Apr;199(4):529-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.015. Epub 2010 Jan 18. Am J Surg. 2010. PMID: 20080227 Review.
-
Laparoscopic surgical education--the experience of the first surgical unit Iaşi.Chirurgia (Bucur). 2011 Jan-Feb;106(1):67-76. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2011. PMID: 21520777 Review.
Cited by
-
Training and assessment using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator: a scoping review of validity evidence.Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1658-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09593-0. Epub 2022 Sep 19. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36123545 Review.
-
Construction and application of a low-cost laparoscopy training simulator as a teaching tool through motor coordination and two-dimensional vision practices.Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022 Feb 28;49:e20223095. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223095. eCollection 2022. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022. PMID: 35239852 Free PMC article.
-
[Use of surgical simulators in further education-A nationwide analysis in Germany].Chirurg. 2021 Nov;92(11):1040-1049. doi: 10.1007/s00104-020-01332-2. Epub 2021 Jan 5. Chirurg. 2021. PMID: 33399900 Free PMC article. German.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Teaching Obstetrics and Gynaecological Procedural Skills on Patients versus Models: A randomized trial.Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jul-Aug;34(4):794-798. doi: 10.12669/pjms.344.15521. Pak J Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 30190730 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of surgical training in the era of simulation.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep 16;6(9):436-47. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.436. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014. PMID: 25228946 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources