Early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
- PMID: 22488783
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24439
Early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
Erratum in
- Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun 1;81(7):1255
Abstract
Background: Studies assessing the timing of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with Non-ST segment elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (NSTE-ACS) have failed to generate a consensus on how early PCI should be performed in such patients.
Purpose: This meta-analysis compares clinical outcomes at 30 days in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI within 24 hours of presentation (early PCI) with those receiving PCI more than 24 hours after presentation (delayed PCI).
Data sources: Data were extracted from searches of MEDLINE (1990-2010) and Google scholar and from scrutiny of abstract booklets from major cardiology meetings (1990-2010).
Study selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that included the composite endpoint of death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days after PCI were considered.
Data extraction: Two independent reviewers extracted data using standard forms. The effects of early and delayed PCI were analyzed by calculating pooled estimates for death, non-fatal MI, bleeding, repeat revascularization and the composite endpoint of death or non-fatal MI at 30 days. Univariate analysis of each of these variables was used to create odds ratios.
Data synthesis: Seven studies with a total of 13,762 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in the odds of the composite endpoint of death or non-fatal MI at 30 days between patients undergoing early PCI and those receiving delayed PCI (OR-0.83, 95%CI 0.62-1.10). Patients receiving delayed PCI experienced a 33% reduction in the odds of repeat revascularization at 30 days compared to those undergoing early PCI (OR-1.33, 95%CI 1.14-1.56, P=0.0004).Conversely, patients undergoing early PCI experienced lower odds of bleeding than those receiving delayed PCI (OR-0.76, 95%CI 0.63-0.91, P = 0.0003).
Conclusions: In NSTE-ACS patients early PCI doesn't reduce the odds of the composite endpoint of death or non-fatal MI at 30 day. This strategy is associated with lower odds of bleeding and higher odds of repeat revascularization at 30 days than a strategy of delayed PCI.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Early vs. delayed invasive strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation: a meta-analysis of randomized studies.QJM. 2011 Mar;104(3):193-200. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq258. Epub 2011 Jan 23. QJM. 2011. PMID: 21262739 Review.
-
Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 23968700 Review.
-
Impact of cigarette smoking on extent of coronary artery disease and prognosis of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the ACUITY Trial (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy).JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(4):372-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.017. Epub 2014 Mar 14. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24630881 Clinical Trial.
-
Timing of angiography with a routine invasive strategy and long-term outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from the FRISC II (Fragmin and Fast Revascularization During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease), ICTUS (Invasive Versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes), and RITA-3 (Intervention Versus Conservative Treatment Strategy in Patients With Unstable Angina or Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Trials.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb;5(2):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.016. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012. PMID: 22361604
-
Timing of invasive strategy in NSTE-ACS patients and effect on clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Atherosclerosis. 2015 Jul;241(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.04.808. Epub 2015 Apr 30. Atherosclerosis. 2015. PMID: 25966439 Review.
Cited by
-
Use, timing and outcome of coronary angiography in patients with high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in daily clinical practice: insights from a 'real world' prospective registry.Neth Heart J. 2019 Feb;27(2):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s12471-018-1212-3. Neth Heart J. 2019. PMID: 30547413 Free PMC article.
-
Indications for an early invasive strategy in NSTE-ACS patients.Neth Heart J. 2020 Mar;28(3):131-135. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-01337-5. Neth Heart J. 2020. PMID: 31696408 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Timing of invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and effect on clinical outcomes.J Thorac Dis. 2017 Nov;9(11):4236-4239. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.21. J Thorac Dis. 2017. PMID: 29268481 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Role of the ECG in initial acute coronary syndrome triage: primary PCI regardless presence of ST elevation or of non-ST elevation.Neth Heart J. 2014 Nov;22(11):484-90. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0598-9. Neth Heart J. 2014. PMID: 25200324 Free PMC article.
-
Regional to tertiary inter-hospital transfer versus in-house percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome.PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0198272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198272. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29927947 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous