Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Dec;55(6):1600-12.
doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0153). Epub 2012 Apr 3.

Cognitive, environmental, and linguistic predictors of syntax in fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome

Bruno Estigarribia  1 , Gary E Martin, Joanne E Roberts
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cognitive, environmental, and linguistic predictors of syntax in fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome

Bruno Estigarribia et al. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine which cognitive, environmental, and speech-language variables predict expressive syntax in boys with fragile X syndrome (FXS), boys with Down syndrome (DS), and typically developing (TD) boys, and whether predictive relationships differed by group.

Method: We obtained Index of Productive Syntax ( Scarborough, 1990) scores for 18 boys with FXS only, 20 boys with both FXS and an autism spectrum disorder, 27 boys with DS, and 25 younger TD boys of similar nonverbal mental age. Predictors included group (diagnosis), nonverbal cognition, phonological working memory (PWM), maternal education, speech intelligibility, and expressive vocabulary. The research questions were addressed via hierarchical linear regression.

Results: Diagnostic group, nonverbal cognition, and PWM predicted 56% of the variance in syntactic ability, with approximately three-fourths of the predicted variance explained by group membership alone. The other factors did not contribute any additional significant variance in this final model. There was no evidence that predictor effects differed by group.

Conclusions: Nonverbal cognition and PWM have an effect on expressive syntax beyond that of diagnostic group. These effects are estimated to be the same in boys with FXS, boys with DS, and TD boys. Explanations for residual variance and the relative role of different predictors are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Descriptive plots for all variables in the full model (with mean values provided and standard deviations indicated by bars)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Abbeduto L, Brady N, Kover ST. Language development and fragile X syndrome: Profiles, syndrome-specificity, and within-syndrome differences. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 2007;13:36–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abbeduto L, Chapman RS. Language development in Down syndrome and fragile X syndrome: Current research and implications for theory and practice. In: Fletcher P, Miller JF, editors. Developmental theory and language disorders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing; 2005. pp. 53–72.
    1. Abbeduto L, Murphy MM, Cawthon SW, Richmond E, Weissman MD, Karadottir S, O’Brien A. Receptive language skills of adolescents and young adults with Down or fragile X syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation. 2003;108:149–160. - PubMed
    1. Abbeduto L, Pavetto M, Kesin E, Weissman MD, Karadottir S, O’Brien A, et al. The linguistic and cognitive profile of Down syndrome: Evidence from a comparison with fragile X syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice. 2001;7:9–15. - PubMed
    1. Bailey DB, Hatton DD, Skinner M, Mesibov G. Autistic behavior, FMR1 protein, and developmental trajectories in young males with fragile X syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2001;31:165–174. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms