Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(3):e32144.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032144. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

Virologic failure of protease inhibitor-based second-line antiretroviral therapy without resistance in a large HIV treatment program in South Africa

Affiliations

Virologic failure of protease inhibitor-based second-line antiretroviral therapy without resistance in a large HIV treatment program in South Africa

Julie H Levison et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Background: We investigated the prevalence of wild-type virus (no major drug resistance) and drug resistance mutations at second-line antiretroviral treatment (ART) failure in a large HIV treatment program in South Africa.

Methodology/ principal findings: HIV-infected patients ≥ 15 years of age who had failed protease inhibitor (PI)-based second-line ART (2 consecutive HIV RNA tests >1000 copies/ml on lopinavir/ritonavir, didanosine, and zidovudine) were identified retrospectively. Patients with virologic failure were continued on second-line ART. Genotypic testing for drug resistance was performed on frozen plasma samples obtained closest to and after the date of laboratory confirmed second-line ART failure. Of 322 HIV-infected patients on second-line ART, 43 were adults with confirmed virologic failure, and 33 had available plasma for viral sequencing. HIV-1 RNA subtype C predominated (n = 32, 97%). Mean duration on ART (SD) prior to initiation of second-line ART was 23 (17) months, and time from second-line ART initiation to failure was 10 (9) months. Plasma samples were obtained 7(9) months from confirmed failure. At second-line failure, 22 patients (67%) had wild-type virus. There was no major resistance to PIs found. Eleven of 33 patients had a second plasma sample taken 8 (5.5) months after the first. Median HIV-1 RNA and the genotypic resistance profile were unchanged.

Conclusions/ significance: Most patients who failed second-line ART had wild-type virus. We did not observe evolution of resistance despite continuation of PI-based ART after failure. Interventions that successfully improve adherence could allow patients to continue to benefit from second-line ART therapy even after initial failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal's policy and have the following competing interest: DRK is a consultant to and has received honoraria or research support from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck and ViiV. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PloS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UNAIDS Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Country Fact Sheets: South Africa. 2010. Available: http://cfs.unaids.org/factsheet.htm?lng_code=en. Accessed: 2011 June 14.
    1. Long L, Fox M, Sanne I, Rosen S. The high cost of second-line antiretroviral therapy for HIV/AIDS in South Africa. AIDS. 2010;24:915–919. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Prioritizing Second-Line Antiretroviral Drugs for Adults and Adolescents: A Public Health Approach. Geneva: World Health Organization, HIV Department; 2007. Available: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/meetingreports/Second_Line_Antiretroviral.pdf. Accessed: 2012 February 8.
    1. Orrell C, Walensky RP, Losina E, Pitt J, Freedberg KA, et al. HIV type-1 clade C resistance genotypes in treatment-naive patients and after first virological failure in a large community antiretroviral therapy programme. Antivir Ther. 2009;14:523–531. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walmsley S, Bernstein B, King M, Arribas J, Beall G, et al. Lopinavir-ritonavir versus nelfinavir for the initial treatment of HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:2039–2046. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances