Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(2):e31608.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031608. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

Maternal LAMP/p55gagHIV-1 DNA immunization induces in utero priming and a long-lasting immune response in vaccinated neonates

Affiliations

Maternal LAMP/p55gagHIV-1 DNA immunization induces in utero priming and a long-lasting immune response in vaccinated neonates

Paula Ordonhez Rigato et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Infants born to HIV-infected mothers are at high risk of becoming infected during gestation or the breastfeeding period. A search is thus warranted for vaccine formulations that will prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission. The LAMP/gag DNA chimeric vaccine encodes the HIV-1 p55gag fused to the lysosome-associated membrane protein-1 (LAMP-1) and has been shown to enhance anti-Gag antibody (Ab) and cellular immune responses in adult and neonatal mice; such a vaccine represents a new concept in antigen presentation. In this study, we evaluated the effect of LAMP/gag DNA immunization on neonates either before conception or during pregnancy. LAMP/gag immunization of BALB/c mice before conception by the intradermal route led to the transfer of anti-Gag IgG1 Ab through the placenta and via breastfeeding. Furthermore, there were an increased percentage of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+T cells in the spleens of neonates. When offspring were immunized with LAMP/gag DNA, the anti-Gag Ab response and the Gag-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells were decreased. Inhibition of anti-Gag Ab production and cellular responses were not observed six months after immunization, indicating that maternal immunization did not interfere with the long-lasting memory response in offspring. Injection of purified IgG in conjunction with LAMP/gag DNA immunization decreased humoral and cytotoxic T-cell responses. LAMP/gag DNA immunization by intradermal injection prior to conception promoted the transfer of Ab, leading to a diminished response to Gag without interfering with the development of anti-Gag T- and B-cell memory. Finally, we assessed responses after one intravenous injection of LAMP/gag DNA during the last five days of pregnancy. The intravenous injection led to in utero immunization. In conclusion, DNA vaccine enconding LAMP-1 with Gag and other HIV-1 antigens should be considered in the development of a protective vaccine for the maternal/fetal and newborn periods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Transfer of high levels of anti-Gag IgG1 Abs from Lamp/gag DNA-immunized mothers to offspring through transplacental and breastfeeding routes.
Female BALB/c mice were primed and boosted with 50 µg of Lamp (L), gag (G) or Lamp/gag (LG) plasmid DNA and mated one day after the boost. (A) Maternal serum and (B) amniotic fluid were obtained by caesarean section from full-term pregnant mice. (C) Breast-milk samples (1∶20) were collected on day 5 after delivery and (D) fetal serum from 0-, 30-, 60- and 90-d-o offspring were evaluated by ELISA using HIV-1 lysates. The results from 4–6 animals per group were expressed as the mean ± SEM. Schematic diagram of the immunization protocol is shown. *p≤0.05 and ***p<0.001 when compared to gag.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Maternal immunization with the Lamp/gag DNA vaccine decreases anti-Gag IgG1 Ab production in immunized offspring.
Female mice were immunized, and 20 days later, they were boosted with 50 µg Lamp (L), gag (G), or Lamp/gag (LG) plasmid DNA and mated one day after the boost. Offspring were either non-immunized or immunized with 5 µg of the same vaccine DNA at 7- and 25-d-o. Offspring serum samples were collected at (A) 30- and (B) 60-d-o (3–8 animals per group). Anti-Gag IgG1 was determined by ELISA using HIV-1 lysates. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Schematic diagram of the immunization protocols are shown. *p≤0.05 and ***p<0.001 when compared to the respective control offspring from non-immunized (NI) mothers.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Maternal Lamp/gag immunization reduces the IFN-γ response of immunized offspring.
Offspring from mothers immunized with Lamp/gag (LG) or gag (G) were immunized with 5 µg of (A) LG or (B) G DNA, respectively. Spleen cells from 35-d-o offspring were cultured with 25 pooled HIV-1 Gag peptides. The figure represents 4–5 assays per group (2–3 animals per group). Bars show the mean ± SEM. Schematic diagram of the immunization protocols are shown. *p≤0.05 and **p<0.01 when compared with immunized offspring from non-immunized (NI) mothers.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Effect of maternal DNA immunization on TGF-β1 levels in milk and on the generation of CD4+CD25+ FoxP3+ T cells in offspring.
Female mice were primed and boosted with 50 µg of Lamp/gag (LG), gag (G), or Lamp (L) plasmid DNA and mated one day after the boost. (A) Breast-milk samples collected 7 days after delivery; (B) percentages of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells in offspring splenocytes at 7 d-o; (C) CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ T cells in individual offspring at 7 d-o, non-immunized (NI), or immunized with L, G or LG. The results of 8–12 animals per group are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Schematic diagram of the immunization protocol is shown. #p≤0.05 and ##p<0.01 when compared with the non-immunized (NI) group; **p<0.01 when compared with the gag-immunized group.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Transfer of IgG from immune mice decreases CTL numbers and anti-Gag IgG Abs in offspring immunized with LAMP/gag.
Offspring from non-immunized mothers were immunized at 7- and 25-d-o with 5 µg of LAMP/gag (LG) and treated with IgG from non-immune (IgG-NI) or LG (IgG-LG)-immunized mice at 7-, 13-, and 25-d-o or without IgG treatment (none). (A) Offspring serum samples from 35-d-o mice (n = 6 per group) were evaluated for anti-Gag IgG Ab levels by ELISA using HIV-1 lysates. (B) In vivo T-cell cytotoxicity was evaluated ten days after LG immunization. Mice were IV injected with target cells from NI mice stained with low and high concentrations of CFSE. The CFSE-high target cells were pulsed with a class I immunodominant peptide (AMQMLKETI), and after 18 h, spleen cells were evaluated. (C) IFN-γ SFCs from 35-d-o offspring (n = 3 per group) were evaluated after stimulation with Gag MHC class I and II epitopes or recombinant p55 of HIV-1. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Schematic diagram of the immunization protocol is shown. **p≤0.01 compared with offspring treated with IgG from NI mice; #p≤0.05 compared with offspring without IgG treatment.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Maternal LAMP/gag immunization does not interfere with long-lasting IFN-γ and B-cell responses in immunized offspring.
Offspring from non-immune (NI) or immune (I) mothers were immunized at 7- and 25-d-o with 5 µg of either Lamp/gag (LG) or gag (G) DNA. Some neonates groups from I or NI mothers received a 3rd boost at 6-months-old. (A) IFN-γ SFCs from 6-month-old offspring after stimulation with MHC H-2d class I- and II-restricted pools of Gag peptides from HIV-1. The figure represents 4–5 assays per group (2–3 animals per group); *p≤0.05 when compared with immune offspring from NI mothers. (B) Serum from offspring was collected when they were 6 months old (6 animals per group), and anti-Gag IgG was evaluated by ELISA using HIV-1 lysates. One group received a boost 10 days before analysis. Bars represent the mean ±SEM. *p≤0.05 when compared with immune offspring from NI mothers. Schematic diagram of the immunization protocols are shown **p<0.01 when compared with gag-immunized offspring.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Intravenous DNA immunization during pregnancy primes the fetal immune system.
Pregnant mice were IV immunized approximately 15–16 days into gestation with 100 µg of Lamp/gag (LG) or gag (G) vaccine DNA. Offspring were either immunized (IM) or not (NI) at 7-d-o with 5 µg of the DNA vaccine. (A) Mother: IFN-γ SFCs from spleen cells of immunized mothers 35 days after delivery and (B) Offspring: IFN-γ SFCs from spleen cells of 35-d-o offspring after stimulation with class I and class II Gag peptides and recombinant p24 of HIV-1. The figure represents 2–3 assays per group (2–3 animals per group). (C) Offspring: Serum samples from 35-d-o NI or IM offspring were evaluated by ELISA using HIV-1 lysates for anti-Gag IgG concentrations. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Schematic diagram of the immunization protocol is shown. *p≤0.05, **p<0.01, and *** p<0.001 when compared with G-offspring from a G-mother; +++p<0.001 when compared with NI offspring from a G-immunized mother.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chasela CS, Hudgens MG, Jamieson DJ, Kayira D, Hosseinipour MC, et al. Maternal or infant antiretroviral drugs to reduce HIV-1 transmission. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2271–2281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. UNAIDS. AIDS Epidemic Update. 2010. Available: http://www.unaids.org/globalreport/Global_report.htm. Accessed 2011 Jan 15.
    1. John GC, Nduati RW, Mbori-Ngacha DA, Richardson BA, Panteleeff D, et al. Correlates of mother-to-child human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) transmission: association with maternal plasma HIV-1 RNA load, genital HIV-1 DNA shedding, and breast infections. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:206–212. - PubMed
    1. Becquet R, Bland R, Leroy V, Rollins NC, Ekouevi DK, et al. Duration, pattern of breastfeeding and postnatal transmission of HIV: pooled analysis of individual data from West and South African cohorts. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7397. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lohman-Payne B, Slyker J, Rowland-Jones SL. Immune-based approaches to the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1: active and passive immunization. Clin Perinatol. 2010;37:787–805. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances