Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec;40(6):1678-92.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr152.

Epidemiological methods in diarrhoea studies--an update

Affiliations
Review

Epidemiological methods in diarrhoea studies--an update

Wolf-Peter Schmidt et al. Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Diarrhoea remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality but is difficult to measure in epidemiological studies. Challenges include the diagnosis based on self-reported symptoms, the logistical burden of intensive surveillance and the variability of diarrhoea in space, time and person.

Methods: We review current practices in sampling procedures to measure diarrhoea, and provide guidance for diarrhoea measurement across a range of study goals. Using 14 available data sets, we estimated typical design effects for clustering at household and village/ neighbourhood level, and measured the impact of adjusting for baseline variables on the precision of intervention effect estimates.

Results: Incidence is the preferred outcome measure in aetiological studies, health services research and vaccine trials. Repeated prevalence measurements (longitudinal prevalence) are appropriate in high-mortality settings where malnutrition is common, although many repeat measures are rarely useful. Period prevalence is an inadequate outcome if an intervention affects illness duration. Adjusting point estimates for age or diarrhoea at baseline in randomized trials has little effect on the precision of estimates. Design effects in trials randomized at household level are usually <2 (range 1.0–3.2). Design effects for larger clusters (e.g. villages or neighbourhoods) vary greatly among different settings and study designs (range 0.1–25.8).

Conclusions: Using appropriate sampling strategies and outcome measures can improve the efficiency, validity and comparability of diarrhoea studies. Allocating large clusters in cluster randomized trials is compromized by unpredictable design effects and should be carried out only if the research question requires it.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Village-level diarrhoea incidence during a 12-month follow-up period in 11 control villages that participated in an intervention trial of solar water disinfection. Vertical lines mark bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. The follow-up incidence is plotted against baseline incidence measured over a 6-week period (A), and against the village rank in baseline incidence over that same period (B)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J. Where and why are 10 million children dying every year? Lancet. 2003;361:2226–34. - PubMed
    1. Kosek M, Lanata CF, Black RE, et al. Directing diarrhoeal disease research towards disease-burden reduction. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27:319–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmidt WP. Setting priorities in diarrhoeal disease research: merits and pitfalls of expert opinion. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27:313–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blum D, Feachem RG. Measuring the impact of water supply and sanitation investments on diarrhoeal diseases: problems of methodology. Int J Epidemiol. 1983;12:357–65. - PubMed
    1. Ejemot RI, Ehiri JE, Meremikwu MM, Critchley JA. Hand washing for preventing diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;23:CD004265. - PubMed

Publication types