Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;18(7):526-36.
doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0587. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

Engineering an integrated cellular interface in three-dimensional hydrogel cultures permits monitoring of reciprocal astrocyte and neuronal responses

Affiliations

Engineering an integrated cellular interface in three-dimensional hydrogel cultures permits monitoring of reciprocal astrocyte and neuronal responses

Emma East et al. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

This study reports a new type of three-dimensional (3D) tissue model for studying interactions between cell types in collagen hydrogels. The aim was to create a 3D cell culture model containing separate cell populations in close proximity without the presence of a mechanical barrier, and demonstrate its relevance to modeling the axon growth-inhibitory cellular interfaces that develop in the central nervous system (CNS) in response to damage. This provides a powerful new tool to determine which aspects of the astroglial scar response and subsequent neuronal regeneration inhibition are determined by the presence of the other cell types. Astrocytes (CNS glia) and dissociated dorsal root ganglia (DRG; containing neurons and peripheral nervous system [PNS] glia) were seeded within collagen solution at 4 °C in adjacent chambers of a stainless steel mould, using cells cultured from wild-type or green fluorescent protein expressing rats, to track specific populations. The divider between the chambers was removed using a protocol that allowed the gels to integrate without mixing of the cell populations. Following setting of the gels, they were maintained in culture for up to 15 days. Reciprocal astrocyte and neuronal responses were monitored using confocal microscopy and 3D image analysis. At DRG:astrocyte interfaces, by 5 days there was an increase in the number of astrocytes at the interface followed by hypertrophy and increased glial fibrillary acidic protein expression at 10 and 15 days, indicative of reactive gliosis. Neurons avoided crossing DRG:astrocyte interfaces, and neuronal growth was restricted to the DRG part of the gel. By contrast, neurons were able to grow freely across DRG:DRG interfaces, demonstrating the absence of a mechanical barrier. These results show that in a precisely controlled 3D environment, an interface between DRG and astrocyte cultures is sufficient to trigger reactive gliosis and inhibition of neuronal regeneration across the interface. Different aspects of the astrocyte response could be independently monitored, providing an insight into the formation of a glial scar. This technology has wide potential for researchers wishing to maintain and monitor interactions between adjacent cell populations in 3D culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Interface experimental set-up. (A) Photograph of stainless steel interface mould; one 0.1 mm thick stainless steel divider is shown; however, up to three dividers could be inserted into the frame. Two culture populations in collagen gels were seeded either side of a steel divider, which was then removed after 2 min to allow gels to integrate. (B) Diagrammatic representation of one astrocyte:DRG interface gel. DRG, dorsal root ganglia. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/tec
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Qualitative assessment of astrocyte reactivity at the interface with dissociated DRG cells. Astrocyte morphology and immunoreactivity was assessed using immunostaining and confocal microscopy for GFP (green), GFAP (red), and Hoechst (blue) at days 5, 10, and 15 in culture. Representative confocal projections are shown of astrocytes at the interface with dissociated DRG cells, and away from the interface, in an astrocyte only region at (A) low and (B) high magnification. Scale bar in (A)=150 μm and scale bar in (B)=40 μm. Over time, astrocytes in contact with/in close proximity to dissociated DRG cells become ramified and hypertrophic, which corresponds to an increase in staining for GFAP. GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein. GFP, green fluorescent protein. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/tec Quantification of astrocyte reactivity at the interface with dissociated DRG cells: (C) GFP positive astrocytic cell nuclei (stained with Hoechst) were quantified at and away from the interface with dissociated DRG cells. Significantly more astrocytes were observed at the interface with dissociated DRG cells than away from the interface at day 5 and 10 in culture. (D) Quantification of GFP staining per cell revealed that astrocytes were becoming hypertrophic over time at the interface with dissociated DRG cells. No differences were observed in astrocyte size away from the interface. (E) Quantification of GFAP staining per cell revealed that astrocytes were becoming reactive at the interface with dissociated DRG cells, with significantly greater GFAP expression at day 15 in culture compared with away from the interface. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Qualitative assessment of astrocyte reactivity at the interface with dissociated DRG cells. Astrocyte morphology and immunoreactivity was assessed using immunostaining and confocal microscopy for GFP (green), GFAP (red), and Hoechst (blue) at days 5, 10, and 15 in culture. Representative confocal projections are shown of astrocytes at the interface with dissociated DRG cells, and away from the interface, in an astrocyte only region at (A) low and (B) high magnification. Scale bar in (A)=150 μm and scale bar in (B)=40 μm. Over time, astrocytes in contact with/in close proximity to dissociated DRG cells become ramified and hypertrophic, which corresponds to an increase in staining for GFAP. GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein. GFP, green fluorescent protein. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/tec Quantification of astrocyte reactivity at the interface with dissociated DRG cells: (C) GFP positive astrocytic cell nuclei (stained with Hoechst) were quantified at and away from the interface with dissociated DRG cells. Significantly more astrocytes were observed at the interface with dissociated DRG cells than away from the interface at day 5 and 10 in culture. (D) Quantification of GFP staining per cell revealed that astrocytes were becoming hypertrophic over time at the interface with dissociated DRG cells. No differences were observed in astrocyte size away from the interface. (E) Quantification of GFAP staining per cell revealed that astrocytes were becoming reactive at the interface with dissociated DRG cells, with significantly greater GFAP expression at day 15 in culture compared with away from the interface. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Qualitative assessment of astrocyte reactivity at the interface with dissociated DRG cells. Astrocyte morphology and immunoreactivity was assessed using immunostaining and confocal microscopy for GFP (green), GFAP (red), and Hoechst (blue) at days 5, 10, and 15 in culture. Representative confocal projections are shown of astrocytes at the interface with dissociated DRG cells, and away from the interface, in an astrocyte only region at (A) low and (B) high magnification. Scale bar in (A)=150 μm and scale bar in (B)=40 μm. Over time, astrocytes in contact with/in close proximity to dissociated DRG cells become ramified and hypertrophic, which corresponds to an increase in staining for GFAP. GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein. GFP, green fluorescent protein. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/tec Quantification of astrocyte reactivity at the interface with dissociated DRG cells: (C) GFP positive astrocytic cell nuclei (stained with Hoechst) were quantified at and away from the interface with dissociated DRG cells. Significantly more astrocytes were observed at the interface with dissociated DRG cells than away from the interface at day 5 and 10 in culture. (D) Quantification of GFP staining per cell revealed that astrocytes were becoming hypertrophic over time at the interface with dissociated DRG cells. No differences were observed in astrocyte size away from the interface. (E) Quantification of GFAP staining per cell revealed that astrocytes were becoming reactive at the interface with dissociated DRG cells, with significantly greater GFAP expression at day 15 in culture compared with away from the interface. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Qualitative assessment of astrocyte reactivity at the interface with dissociated DRG cells. Astrocyte morphology and immunoreactivity was assessed using immunostaining and confocal microscopy for GFP (green), GFAP (red), and Hoechst (blue) at days 5, 10, and 15 in culture. Representative confocal projections are shown of astrocytes at the interface with dissociated DRG cells, and away from the interface, in an astrocyte only region at (A) low and (B) high magnification. Scale bar in (A)=150 μm and scale bar in (B)=40 μm. Over time, astrocytes in contact with/in close proximity to dissociated DRG cells become ramified and hypertrophic, which corresponds to an increase in staining for GFAP. GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein. GFP, green fluorescent protein. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/tec Quantification of astrocyte reactivity at the interface with dissociated DRG cells: (C) GFP positive astrocytic cell nuclei (stained with Hoechst) were quantified at and away from the interface with dissociated DRG cells. Significantly more astrocytes were observed at the interface with dissociated DRG cells than away from the interface at day 5 and 10 in culture. (D) Quantification of GFP staining per cell revealed that astrocytes were becoming hypertrophic over time at the interface with dissociated DRG cells. No differences were observed in astrocyte size away from the interface. (E) Quantification of GFAP staining per cell revealed that astrocytes were becoming reactive at the interface with dissociated DRG cells, with significantly greater GFAP expression at day 15 in culture compared with away from the interface. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
CSPG expression at the interface with dissociated DRG cells. (A) Astrocyte CSPG immunoreactivity was assessed using immunostaining and confocal microscopy, for CS56 (red) and Hoechst (blue) at days 5, 10, and 15 in culture. Representative confocal projections are shown of astrocytes at the interface with dissociated DRG cells, and away from the interface, in an astrocyte-only region at high magnification. Scale bar=100 μm. (B) Quantification of the volume of CSPG staining revealed a trend toward greater CSPG staining at the interface with DRG cells although these differences were not significantly different at any time point. CSPG, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/tec
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Assessment of neuronal growth in interface gels. (A) Neuronal growth was investigated using immunostaining and confocal microscopy, for GFP (green), βIII tubulin (red), and Hoechst (blue) at days 5, 10, and 15 in culture. Representative confocal projections are shown of control gels (an interface gel of dissociated GFP DRG cells with dissociated WT DRG cells) and test gels (an interface gel of GFP astrocytes with dissociated WT DRG cells). Arrowheads indicate neurites growing parallel to the interface. Scale bar=150 μm. Neuronal growth was assessed in control gels and test gels at day 5 in culture. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/tec (B) The number of neurites was quantified in confocal projections. While there was a trend for a reduced number of neurites in the DRG:astrocyte interface gels, this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.0547 at the interface vs. control DRG:DRG interfaces). (C) Mean neurite length did not significantly differ between the different interfaces, at or away from the interface. (D) Analysis of the angle of neurite growth revealed differences between the control and test interfaces. Neurites were present at all angles in control interfaces, whereas in test interfaces, neurites were predominantly orientated parallel to the interface with astrocytes. (E) Significantly fewer neurites in the test gels crossed the interface compared with control gels in which more neurites (GFP positive) crossed the interface. ***p<0.001.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Assessment of neuronal growth in interface gels. (A) Neuronal growth was investigated using immunostaining and confocal microscopy, for GFP (green), βIII tubulin (red), and Hoechst (blue) at days 5, 10, and 15 in culture. Representative confocal projections are shown of control gels (an interface gel of dissociated GFP DRG cells with dissociated WT DRG cells) and test gels (an interface gel of GFP astrocytes with dissociated WT DRG cells). Arrowheads indicate neurites growing parallel to the interface. Scale bar=150 μm. Neuronal growth was assessed in control gels and test gels at day 5 in culture. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/tec (B) The number of neurites was quantified in confocal projections. While there was a trend for a reduced number of neurites in the DRG:astrocyte interface gels, this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.0547 at the interface vs. control DRG:DRG interfaces). (C) Mean neurite length did not significantly differ between the different interfaces, at or away from the interface. (D) Analysis of the angle of neurite growth revealed differences between the control and test interfaces. Neurites were present at all angles in control interfaces, whereas in test interfaces, neurites were predominantly orientated parallel to the interface with astrocytes. (E) Significantly fewer neurites in the test gels crossed the interface compared with control gels in which more neurites (GFP positive) crossed the interface. ***p<0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. East E. Phillips J.B. Tissue engineered cell culture models for nervous system research. In: Greco G.N., editor. Tissue Engineering Research Trends. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2008. pp. 141–160.
    1. Kaewkhaw R. Scutt A.M. Haycock J.W. Anatomical site influences the differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells for Schwann-cell phenotype and function. Glia. 2011;59:734. - PubMed
    1. LaPlaca M.C. Simon C.M. Prado G.R. Cullen D.K. CNS injury biomechanics and experimental models. Prog Brain Res. 2007;161:13. - PubMed
    1. King V.R. Phillips J.B. Hunt-Grubbe H. Brown R. Priestley J.V. Characterization of non-neuronal elements within fibronectin mats implanted into the damaged adult rat spinal cord. Biomaterials. 2006;27:485. - PubMed
    1. Phillips J.B. King V.R. Ward Z. Porter R.A. Priestley J.V. Brown R.A. Fluid shear in viscous fibronectin gels allows aggregation of fibrous materials for CNS tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2004;25:2769. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources