Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec 12:8:529.
doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-529.

Selection of recombinant MVA by rescue of the essential D4R gene

Affiliations

Selection of recombinant MVA by rescue of the essential D4R gene

Patricia S Ricci et al. Virol J. .

Abstract

Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) has become a promising vaccine vector due to its immunogenicity and its proven safety in humans. As a general approach for stringent and rapid selection of recombinant MVA, we assessed marker rescue of the essential viral D4R gene in an engineered deletion mutant that is fully replication defective in wild-type cells. Recombinant, replicating virus was obtained by re-introduction of the deleted viral gene as a dominant selection marker into the deletion mutant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Outline of the D4R-dominant host range selection system. a. Schematic representation of the plasmid pDM-Zgpt for the construction of the D4R-deleted dMVA-ZG, and the corresponding insertion locus in the genome of MVA. b. Plasmid pDM-D4R-YF and the defective parental virus dMVA-ZG. MVA sequences are represented by boxes. The MVA genes D3R, D4R, D5R are marked grey. Foreign genes cassettes inserted into MVA are symbolized by hatched boxes. Arrows indicate the binding sites of the PCR primers that were used for confirmation of the structure and purity of dMVA-ZG.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plaque formation of dMVA-ZG and wild-type MVA in avian DF-1 cells. cDF-1 (a, b) and wild-type DF-1 (c, d) cells were infected with 100 pfu/well of dMVA-ZG (a, c) or MVA-wt (b, d). Four days post infection, immunostaining was performed with anti-vaccinia virus antibodies. Photographs show immune-stained plaques.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Growth kinetics of MVA and dMVA-ZG. cDF-1 cells were infected with the defective virus dMVA-ZG at moi = 0.05. For comparison, infections of DF-1 cells dMVA-ZG and with wild-type MVA were performed in parallel. Cells were harvested at the indicated time points and the viral titers were determined by TCID50 titration. Mean values ± SEM are shown (n = 6).
Figure 4
Figure 4
PCR analysis of the D4R deletion in the defective virus dMVA-ZG. Genomic DNA of dMVA-ZG was subjected to PCR amplification using a primer pair that frames the D4R deletion (Lane 5). Negative controls were run without any template (Lane 2), with uninfected cDF-1 (Lane 3) cells and with the recombination plasmid pDM-Zgpt (Lane 4). Spike controls were performed with dMVA-ZG containing MVA-wt at 0.001-1% (Lanes 6-9). 1% corresponds to 1 000 pfu virus. A reaction with MVA-wt alone is shown on lane 10.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Growth kinetics of the recombinants rMVA-YF/D4 and rMVA-YF/del3. DF-1 cells were infected with rMVA-YF/D4 and rMVA-YF/del3 at moi = 0.05. Cells were harvested at the indicated time points and the viral titers were determined by TCID50 titration. Mean values ± SEM are shown (n = 6).
Figure 6
Figure 6
YFV antigen expression from a non-purified virus stock. Western blot analysis of yellow fever prME protein expression was performed at different passages of an unselected rMVA-YF/D4 stock, using a polyclonal anti YFV guinea pig serum that detects the YFV E protein as a ~50 kDa band. The blot shows the primary virus crude stock following infection of DF-1 cells with dMVA-ZG and transfection with pDM-D4R/YF (lane 2), and harvest from the first (lane 3), the second (lane 4) and the third passage (lane 5) of this stock. In parallel, the plasmid pd3-YFprMEco that lacks the D4R gene was transfected into dMVA-ZG infected DF-1 cells (lane 6) and passaged once (lane 7). As a positive control, clonally purified rMVA-YF/del3 was used (lane 8). Uninfected cells are shown on lane 9.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mayr A, Hochstein-Mintzel V, Stickl H. Abstammung, Eigenschaften und Verwendung des attenuierten Vaccinia-Stammes MVA. Infection. 1975;3:6–14. doi: 10.1007/BF01641272. - DOI
    1. Mayr A, Stickl H, Muller HK, Danner K, Singer H. The smallpox vaccination strain MVA: marker, genetic structure, experience gained with the parenteral vaccination and behavior in organisms with a debilitated defence mechanism (author's transl) Zentralbl Bakteriol B. 1978;167:375–390. - PubMed
    1. Stickl H, Hochstein-Mintzel V, Mayr A, Huber HC, Schafer H, Holzner A. MVA vaccination against smallpox: clinical tests with an attenuated live vaccinia virus strain (MVA) (author's transl) Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1974;99:2386–2392. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1108143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parrino J, McCurdy LH, Larkin BD, Gordon IJ, Rucker SE, Enama ME, Koup RA, Roederer M, Bailer RT, Moodie Z, Gu L, Yan L, Graham BS. Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) against Dryvax challenge in vaccinia-naive and vaccinia-immune individuals. Vaccine. 2007;25:1513–1525. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.10.047. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. von Krempelhuber A, Vollmar J, Pokorny R, Rapp P, Wulff N, Petzold B, Handley A, Mateo L, Siersbol H, Kollaritsch H, Chaplin P. A randomized, double-blind, dose-finding Phase II study to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of the third generation smallpox vaccine candidate IMVAMUNE. Vaccine. 2010;28:1209–1216. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed