[The cytogenetic characteristics of 178 acute myeloid leukemia patients]
- PMID: 22093563
[The cytogenetic characteristics of 178 acute myeloid leukemia patients]
Abstract
Objective: To explore the cytogenetic characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients.
Methods: The karyotype analysis was performed in 178 AML using the short-term culture of bone marrow cell and G-banding technique.
Results: Among the 178 patients, 171 had enough metaphases for analysis and 128 (74.9%) had clonal karyotypic abnormalities. Twenty-seven patients were secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS-AML), with 25 (92.6%) patients carrying clonal karyotypic abnormalities. Among the remaining 144 patients of de novo AML, 103 (71.5%) had clonal karyotypic abnormalities. The rate of abnormal clonal karyotype was higher in MDS-AML than that of de novo AML (P = 0.021). Among the 171 patients, 41 (24.0%) were in favorable risk group, 80(46.8%) in intermediate risk group and 50 (29.2%) in adverse risk group. t(15;17) was the most common chromosomal aberration. The majority intermediate risk chromosomal aberration was normal karyotype. The most common cytogenetic abnormality among adverse group was a complex karyotype. Adverse cytogenetic aberrations, such as -5/5q-, -7/7q-, frequently occurred in conjunction with one another as part of a complex karyotype. Totally 75 patients were 60 years or older, among them, 16.0% were in favorable risk group, 48.0% in intermediate risk group and 36.0% in adverse risk group. Among 96 younger patients, 30.2% were in favorable risk group, 45.8% in intermediate risk group and 24.0% in adverse risk group. The rate of favorable risk chromosomal aberration was lower in elder patients than in younger (P = 0.031). The rate of adverse risk chromosomal aberration and the rate of monosomal karyotype were higher in MDS-AML than in de novo AML patients (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The most common favorable, intermediate and adverse chromosomal aberrations were t(15;17), normal karyotype and complex karyotype respectively. The karyotype was poor in MDS-AML and elder AML patients.
Similar articles
-
Cytogenetic findings in adult secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML): frequency of favorable and adverse chromosomal aberrations do not differ from adult de novo AML.Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010 Oct 15;202(2):108-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.06.013. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010. PMID: 20875873
-
[Comparison of chromosome karyotype between myelodysplastic syndrome and acute leukemia patients confirmed at the same period].Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Apr;22(2):387-92. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2014.02.022. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 24763010 Chinese.
-
Pooled analysis of clinical and cytogenetic features in treatment-related and de novo adult acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes based on a consecutive series of 761 patients analyzed 1976-1993 and on 5098 unselected cases reported in the literature 1974-2001.Leukemia. 2002 Dec;16(12):2366-78. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402713. Leukemia. 2002. PMID: 12454741
-
Chromosomal abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia.Clin Lab Med. 1990 Dec;10(4):755-67. Clin Lab Med. 1990. PMID: 2272173 Review.
-
Is secondary leukemia an independent poor prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia?Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2007 Mar;20(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2006.10.006. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2007. PMID: 17336252 Review.
Cited by
-
Retrospective comparison of fludarabine in combination with intermediate-dose cytarabine versus high-dose cytarabine as consolidation therapies for acute myeloid leukemia.Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(27):e134. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000134. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014. PMID: 25501050 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous