Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;23(1):151-62.
doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-05-0456. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

miR-503 represses CUG-binding protein 1 translation by recruiting CUGBP1 mRNA to processing bodies

Affiliations

miR-503 represses CUG-binding protein 1 translation by recruiting CUGBP1 mRNA to processing bodies

Yu-Hong Cui et al. Mol Biol Cell. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

microRNAs (miRNAs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) jointly regulate gene expression at the posttranscriptional level and are involved in many aspects of cellular functions. The RBP CUG-binding protein 1 (CUGBP1) destabilizes and represses the translation of several target mRNAs, but the exact mechanism that regulates CUGBP1 abundance remains elusive. In this paper, we show that miR-503, computationally predicted to associate with three sites of the CUGBP1 mRNA, represses CUGBP1 expression. Overexpression of an miR-503 precursor (pre-miR-503) reduced the de novo synthesis of CUGBP1 protein, whereas inhibiting miR-503 by using an antisense RNA (antagomir) enhanced CUGBP1 biosynthesis and elevated its abundance; neither intervention changed total CUGBP1 mRNA levels. Studies using heterologous reporter constructs revealed a greater repressive effect of miR-503 through the CUGBP1 coding region sites than through the single CUGBP1 3'-untranslated region target site. CUGBP1 mRNA levels in processing bodies (P-bodies) increased in cells transfected with pre-miR-503, while silencing P-body resident proteins Ago2, RCK, or LSm4 decreased miR-503-mediated repression of CUGBP1 expression. Decreasing the levels of cellular polyamines reduced endogenous miR-503 levels and promoted CUGBP1 expression, an effect that was prevented by ectopic miR-503 overexpression. Repression of CUGBP1 by miR-503 in turn altered the expression of CUGBP1 target mRNAs and thus increased the sensitivity of intestinal epithelial cells to apoptosis. These findings identify miR-503 as both a novel regulator of CUGBP1 expression and a modulator of intestinal epithelial homoeostasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 1:
miR-503 associates with the CUGBP1 mRNA. (A) Schematic representation of CUGBP1 mRNA depicting predicted target sites for miR-503 in its CR and 3′-UTR. Alignment of the CUGBP1 mRNA sequences with miR-503: top strand, CUGBP1 mRNA; bottom strand, miR-503. (B) Levels of biotinylated miR-503 after transfection for 48 h: (a) schematic representation of biotinylated miR-503, (b) miR-503 levels as measured by Q-PCR analysis, and (c) U6 RNA levels. Values are mean ± SE from three separate experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with control scramble oligomer. (C) Binding of biotinylated miR-503 to mRNAs encoding CUGBP1, CDK2, JunD, and c-Myc: (a) levels of mRNAs in the materials pulled down by biotin-miR-503 and (b) levels of total input mRNAs. * p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with scramble oligomer.
FIGURE 2:
FIGURE 2:
miR-503 represses CUGBP1 mRNA translation. (A) Levels of miR-503 in cells transfected with pre-miR-503 for 48 h as measured by Q-PCR analysis. Values are mean ± SE from three separate experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with control scramble oligomer. (B) Changes in CUGBP1 protein expression after ectopic miR-503 overexpression. Whole-cell lysates were prepared for Western blotting; equal loading was monitored by assessing β-actin levels. (C) Levels of CUGBP1 mRNA as examined by RT-PCR (left) or Q-PCR (right) analyses. (D) Changes in newly synthesized CUGBP1 protein as measured by IP with anti-CUGBP1 antibody in cells described in (A). Left, representative immunoblots of newly synthesized CUGBP1; right, quantitative analysis of the immunoblotting signals as measured by densitometry. Values are mean ± SE of data from three separate experiments; the relative levels of newly synthesized CUGBP1 were corrected by measuring GAPDH signals. * p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with control scramble oligomer. (E) Changes in CUGBP1 translation efficiency as measured by analysis of CUGBP1-CR or its 3′-UTR luciferase reporter (schematic) after cotransfection with a Renilla luciferase reporter. Values are mean ± SE of data from three separate experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with control scramble oligomer. (F–J) Effect of miR-503 silencing on CUGBP1 expression. After cells were transfected with the corresponding oligomer targeting miR-503 (anti-miR-503) or C-oligo for 48 h, various measurements were performed as described above. Values are mean ± SE of data from three separate experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with C-oligo.
FIGURE 3:
FIGURE 3:
Changes in activities of CUGBP1 CR luciferase reporters after deletion of miR-503–binding site. (A) Effect of 5′-deletion of CUGBP1 CR on its luciferase reporter activity. Top, schematic of plasmids of different chimeric firefly luciferase CUGBP1 CR reporters. BS, predicted miR-503–binding site. Bottom, levels of CUGBP1 CR luciferase reporter activity. Twenty-four hours after transfection with pre-miR-503, cells were cotransfected with CUGBP1 CR F-Luc constructs and a Renilla luciferase reporter. Levels of firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were assayed 24 h later. Results were normalized to the Renilla luciferase activity and expressed as the mean ± SE of data from three separate experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with control scrambled oligomer. (B) Effect of deletion of specific miR-503–binding site (schematic) in CUGBP1 CR on luciferase reporter activity after ectopic miR-503 overexpression.
FIGURE 4:
FIGURE 4:
miR-503 increases CUGBP1 mRNA recruitment to P-bodies. (A) CUGBP1 mRNA interaction with components of P-bodies. After cells were transfected with the Ago2 expression vector (Ago2) or pre-miR-503 alone or cotransfected with Ago2 and pre-miR-503 for 48 h, the association of CUGBP1 mRNA with HA-Ago2 was measured by RNP IP using anti-Ago2 (top) or control IgG (bottom) antibodies, which was followed by Q-PCR analysis. Values are mean ± SE of data from three separate experiments. *,+ p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with scramble or Ago2 and cells transfected with pre-miR-503, respectively. (B and C) Effect of silencing Ago2, RCK, and LSm4 on CUGBP1 expression in cells overexpressing miR-503. Top, representative immunoblots of CUGBP1 protein; bottom, quantitative analysis of the immunoblotting signals as measured by densitometry. Cells were transfected with pre-miR-503 or cotransfected with pre-miR-503 and specific siRNA targeting Ago2 (siAgo2), RCK (siRCK), or LSm4 (siLSm4) for 48 h; the levels of CUGBP1, Ago2, and RCK proteins (B), CUGPB1 and LSm4 proteins (C), and loading control β-actin (B and C) were assessed by Western blot analysis. Values are mean ± SE of data from three separate experiments; the relative levels of CUGBP1 were corrected for protein loading by measuring β-actin signals. * p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with scramble or cells cotransfected with pre-miR-503 and siAgo2, siRCK or siLSm4. (D) Colocalization of CUGBP1 mRNA with P-bodies after miR-503 overexpression. Left, schematic of the plasmids used for the visualization of CUGBP1 mRNA. pMS2 and pMS2-CUGBP1 expressed MS2 and MS2-CUGBP1 RNAs, each containing 12 tandem MS2 hairpins; pMS2-YFP expressed a fusion fluorescent protein (MS2-YFP) capable of detecting MS2-containing RNA. Right, images of CUGBP1 mRNA colocalization with P-bodies in cells overexpressing miR-503. Confocal microscopy was used to visualize MS2 and MS2-CUGBP1 mRNA using MS2-YFP (green fluorescence); red, RCK (P-body marker) signals; yellow, colocalized red and green signals. Three experiments were performed that showed similar results.
FIGURE 5:
FIGURE 5:
Decreasing cellular polyamines by inhibiting ODC with DFMO enhances CUGBP1 mRNA translation by reducing miR-503. (A) Changes in the levels of miR-503, miR-29b, and U6 RNA as examined by Q-PCR analysis in cells exposed to DFMO or DFMO plus putrescine (Put) for 4 d. Values are mean ± SE of data from three separate experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with control cells and cells exposed to DFMO plus putrescine. (B) Changes in the level of CUGBP1 expression after polyamine depletion: (a) representative immunoblots of CUGBP1 protein from Western blot analysis and (b) newly synthesized CUGBP1 protein as measured by IP with anti-CUGBP1 antibody. (C) Changes in CUGBP1 mRNA levels as measured by RT- (top) or Q-PCR (bottom) analysis. (D) Changes in CUGBP1 translation efficiency as measured by analysis of CUGBP1-CR luciferase reporter in cells described in (A). Values are mean ± SE of data from three separate experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with controls and cells exposed to DFMO plus Put. (E) Effect of ectopic overexpression of miR-503 on CUGBP1 expression in polyamine-deficient cells. After cells were exposed to DFMO for 2 d, they were transfected with pre-miR-503 or control scramble oligomer and then maintained in the medium containing DFMO for an additional 2 d. Levels of CUGBP1 and HuR were examined by Western blot analysis; three separate experiments were performed that showed similar results.
FIGURE 6:
FIGURE 6:
Increasing cellular polyamines by ectopic ODC overexpression represses CUGBP1 translation by increasing miR-503. (A) Changes in the levels of miR-503, miR-29b, and U6 RNA as examined by Q-PCR analysis in stable ODC-IEC cells. Values are mean ± SE of data from three separate experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with vector containing no ODC cDNA. (B) Changes in the level of CUGBP1 expression in stable ODC-IEC cells: (a) representative immunoblots of CUGBP1 and (b) newly synthesized CUGBP1 protein as measured by IP with anti-CUGBP1 antibody. (C) Changes in CUGBP1 mRNA levels as measured by RT- (top) or Q-PCR (bottom) analyses. (D) CUGBP1 translation efficiency as measured by analysis of CUGBP1-CR luciferase reporter in stable ODC-IEC cells. Values are mean ± SE of data from three separate experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with vector alone. (E) Effect of miR-503 silencing on CUGBP1 expression in stable ODC-IEC cells. Top, representative immunoblots of CUGBP1 protein; bottom, quantitative analysis of the immunoblotting signals as measured by densitometry. Cells were transfected with the corresponding oligomer targeting miR-503 (anti-miR-503) or C-oligo for 48 h; levels of CUGBP1 protein were examined by Western blot analysis. Values are mean ± SE of data from three separate experiments; the relative levels of CUGBP1 were corrected for protein loading by measuring β-actin signals. * p < 0.05 compared with vector alone or ODC-IEC cells transfected with C-oligo.
FIGURE 7:
FIGURE 7:
miR-503 silencing protects IEC cells against apoptosis through induction in CUGBP1. (A) TNF-α/CHX–induced apoptosis after various treatments. Cells were transfected with the anti-miR-503 or C-oligo (Control) for 48 h; apoptosis was measured 4 h after treatment with TNF-α/CHX: (a) cells transfected with C-oligo, (b) cells transfected with anti-miR-503, (c) cells transfected with anti-miR-503 and control siRNA (C-siRNA), and (d) cells transfected with anti-miR-503 and siRNA targeting CUGBP1 (siCUGBP1). Original magnification: 150×. (B) Percentages of apoptotic cells after different treatments described in (A). Values are mean ± SE of data from three experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with cells untreated with TNF-α/CHX; + p < 0.05 compared with cells exposed to TNF-α/CHX; # p < 0.05 compared with cells cotransfected with anti-miR-503 and C-siRNA and then exposed to TNF-α/CHX. (C) Changes in levels of caspase-3 in cells described in (A). Whole-cell lysates were harvested, and the levels of procaspase-3 and caspase-3 were assessed by Western blot analysis. β-actin immunoblotting was performed as an internal control for equal loading. (D) Effect of miR-503 on the expression of c-IAP and p65 proteins. Left, changes in the levels of c-IAP1, c-IAP2 and p65 proteins in cells overexpressing miR-503. Cells were transfected with pre-miR-503 for 48 h, whereupon whole-cell lysates were prepared, and the levels of various proteins were measured. Three separate experiments were performed that showed similar results. Right, the levels of CUGBP1 and c-IAP proteins after transfecting anti-miR-503 alone or transfecting both anti-miR-503 and siCUGBP1 as described in (A).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdelmohsen K, Srikantan S, Kuwano Y, Gorospe M. miR-519 reduces cell proliferation by lowering RNA-binding protein HuR levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:20297–20302. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baltimore D, Boldin MP, O'Connell RM, Rao DS, Taganov KD. MicroRNAs: new regulators of immune cell development and function. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:839–845. - PubMed
    1. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–233. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhattacharyya SN, Habermacher R, Martine U, Closs EI, Filipowicz W. Relief of microRNA-mediated translational repression in human cells subjected to stress. Cell. 2006;125:1111–1124. - PubMed
    1. Buchan JR, Parker R. Eukaryotic stress granules: the ins and outs of translation. Mol Cell. 2009;36:932–941. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms