Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;20(8):1629-37.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0246. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

Sex disparities in cancer mortality and survival

Affiliations

Sex disparities in cancer mortality and survival

Michael B Cook et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Previous research has noted higher cancer mortality rates and lower survival among males than females. However, systematic comparisons of these two metrics by sex have been limited.

Methods: We extracted U.S. vital rates and survival data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database for 36 cancers by sex and age for the period 1977 to 2006. We compared sex-specific mortality rates and examined male-to-female mortality rate ratios (MRR). We also extracted case data which included age and date of diagnosis, sex, primary cancer site, tumor stage and grade, survival time, vital status, and cause of death. Relative cancer-specific HRs for death in the 5-year period following diagnosis were estimated with Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for covariates.

Results: For the vast majority of cancers, age-adjusted mortality rates were higher among males than females with the highest male-to-female MRR for lip (5.51), larynx (5.37), hypopharynx (4.47), esophagus (4.08), and urinary bladder (3.36). Cancer-specific survival was, for most cancers, worse for males than females, but such disparities were drastically less than corresponding MRRs [e.g., lip (HR = 0.93), larynx (HR = 1.09), hypopharynx (HR = 0.98), esophagus (HR = 1.05), and urinary bladder (HR = 0.83)].

Conclusions: Male-to-female MRRs differed markedly while cancer survival disparities were much less pronounced. This suggests that sex-related cancer disparities are more strongly related to etiology than prognosis.

Impact: Future analytic studies should attempt to understand causes of observed sex disparities in cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Male-To-Female Mortality Rate Ratios and Sex-Specific Mortality Rates by Age for Selected Cancers, 1977–2006. a. Larynx b. Esophagus c. Lung and bronchus d. Skin excluding basal and squamous e. Liver and intrahepatic bile duct

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Institute of Medicine. Exploring the biological contributions to human health: does sex matter? J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001;10:433–9. - PubMed
    1. Cook MB, Dawsey SM, Freedman ND, Inskip PD, Wichner SM, Quraishi SM, et al. Sex disparities in cancer incidence by period and age. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1174–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shang Y. Hormones and cancer. Cell Res. 2007;17:277–9. - PubMed
    1. Whiteman DC, Sadeghi S, Pandeya N, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Bain CJ, et al. Combined effects of obesity, acid reflux and smoking on the risk of adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus. Gut. 2008;57:173–80. - PubMed
    1. D’Souza G, Agrawal Y, Halpern J, Bodison S, Gillison Maura L. Oral Sexual Behaviors Associated with Prevalent Oral Human Papillomavirus Infection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009;199:1263–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types