Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Sep;68(9):1137-44.
doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.105. Epub 2011 May 9.

Comparison of analytical platforms for cerebrospinal fluid measures of β-amyloid 1-42, total tau, and p-tau181 for identifying Alzheimer disease amyloid plaque pathology

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of analytical platforms for cerebrospinal fluid measures of β-amyloid 1-42, total tau, and p-tau181 for identifying Alzheimer disease amyloid plaque pathology

Anne M Fagan et al. Arch Neurol. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD) are currently being considered for inclusion in revised diagnostic criteria for research and/or clinical purposes to increase the certainty of antemortem diagnosis.

Objective: To test whether CSF biomarker assays differ in their ability to identify true markers of underlying AD pathology (eg, amyloid plaques and/or neurofibrillary tangles) in living individuals.

Design: We compared the performances of the 2 most commonly used platforms, INNOTEST enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and INNO-BIA AlzBio3, for measurement of CSF β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau proteins to identify the presence of amyloid plaques in a research cohort (n=103). Values obtained for CSF Aβ1-42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau(181)) using the 2 assay platforms were compared with brain amyloid load as assessed by positron emission tomography using the amyloid imaging agent Pittsburgh compound B.

Setting: The Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri.

Subjects: Research volunteers who were cognitively normal or had mild to moderate AD dementia.

Results: The 2 assay platforms yielded different (approximately 2- to 6-fold) absolute values for the various analytes, but relative values were highly correlated. The CSF Aβ1-42 correlated inversely and tau and p-tau(181) correlated positively with the amount of cortical Pittsburgh compound B binding, albeit to differing degrees. Both assays yielded similar patterns of CSF biomarker correlations with amyloid load. The ratios of total tau to Aβ1-42 and p-tau(181) to Aβ1-42 outperformed any single analyte, including Aβ1-42, in discriminating individuals with vs without cortical amyloid.

Conclusions: The INNOTEST and INNO-BIA CSF platforms perform equally well in identifying individuals with underlying amyloid plaque pathology. Differences in absolute values, however, point to the need for assay-specific diagnostic cutoff values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between the assay platforms for the various CSF analytes. Analytes include A)1-42; B) total tau; C) P-tau181; D) total tau/Aβ1-42; and E) p-tau181/Aβ1-42. r, Spearman rho correlation coefficient.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between CSF analytes and cortical amyloid load. Analytes include A, B)1-42; C, D) total tau; E, F) P-tau181; G, H) total tau/Aβ1-42; and I, J) p-tau181/Aβ1-42. Left panels, INNOTEST®. Right panels, INNO-BIA. r, Spearman rho correlation coefficient.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) describing CSF biomarker sensitivity and specificity for discriminating amyloid-positive (MCBP≥0.18) from amyloid-negative (MCBP<0.18) participants. CSF values were obtained with A) the INNOTEST® or B) the INNO-BIA assay.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Price JL, Morris JC. Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and “preclinical” Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:358–368. - PubMed
    1. Hulette CM, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Murray MG, Saunders AM, Mash DC, McIntyre LM. Neuropathological and neuropsychological changes in “normal” aging: Evidence for preclinical Alzheimer disease in cognitively normal individuals. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1998;57:1168–1174. - PubMed
    1. Price J, McKeel D, Buckles V, et al. Neuropathology of nondemented aging: presumptive evidence for preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30:1026–1036. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan E. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939–944. - PubMed
    1. Knopman D, DeKosky S, Cummings J, et al. Practice parameter: Diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2001;56:1143–1153. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms