Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Mar 18;144(6):986-98.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.016.

Interactome networks and human disease

Marc Vidal  1 , Michael E Cusick, Albert-László Barabási
Affiliations
Review

Interactome networks and human disease

Marc Vidal et al. Cell. .

Abstract

Complex biological systems and cellular networks may underlie most genotype to phenotype relationships. Here, we review basic concepts in network biology, discussing different types of interactome networks and the insights that can come from analyzing them. We elaborate on why interactome networks are important to consider in biology, how they can be mapped and integrated with each other, what global properties are starting to emerge from interactome network models, and how these properties may relate to human disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Perturbations in biological systems and cellular networks may underlie genotype-phenotype relationships
By interacting with each other, genes and their products form complex cellular networks. The link between perturbations in network and systems properties and phenotypes, such as Mendelian disorders, complex traits, and cancer, might be as important as that between genotypes and phenotypes.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Networks in cellular systems
To date cellular networks are most available for the “super-model” organisms (Davis, 2004) yeast, worm, fly, and plant. High-throughput interactome mapping relies upon genome-scale resources such as ORFeome resources, a segment of which is shown in the background. Several types of interactome networks discussed are depicted around the periphery. In a protein interaction network nodes represent proteins and edges represent physical interactions. In a transcriptional regulatory network nodes represent transcription factors (circular nodes) or putative DNA regulatory elements (diamond nodes) and edges represent physical binding between the two. In a gene-disease network, nodes represent disease genes and edges represent genes mutation of which is associated with disease. In a virus-host network nodes represent viral proteins (square nodes) or host proteins (round nodes) and edges represent physical interactions between the two. In a metabolic network nodes represent enzymes and edges represent metabolites that are products or substrates of the enzymes. The network depictions seem dense, but they represent only small portions of available interactome network maps, which themselves constitute only a few percent of the complete interactomes within cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Integrated networks
Co-expression and phenotypic profiling can be thought of as matrices comprising all genes of an organism against all conditions that this organism has been exposed to within a given expression compendium and all phenotypes tested, respectively. For any correlation measurement, Pearson Correlation Coefficients (PCCs) being one of the most widely used, the threshold between what is considered co-expressed and non-co-expressed needs to be set using appropriate titration procedures. The resulting integrated networks have powerful predictive value.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Agarwal S, Deane CM, Porter MA, Jones NS. Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6:e1000817. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn YY, Bagrow JP, Lehmann S. Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature. 2010;466:761–764. - PubMed
    1. Albert R, Barabasi AL. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Physics. 2002;74:47–97.
    1. Alon U. Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:450–461. - PubMed
    1. Altshuler D, Daly MJ, Lander ES. Genetic mapping in human disease. Science. 2008;322:881–888. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types