Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Mar 1;25(5):409-33.
doi: 10.1101/gad.2021311.

Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications

Affiliations
Review

Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications

Sophie E Polo et al. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

Genome integrity is constantly monitored by sophisticated cellular networks, collectively termed the DNA damage response (DDR). A common feature of DDR proteins is their mobilization in response to genotoxic stress. Here, we outline how the development of various complementary methodologies has provided valuable insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics of DDR protein assembly/disassembly at sites of DNA strand breaks in eukaryotic cells. Considerable advances have also been made in understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms for these events, with post-translational modifications of DDR factors being shown to play prominent roles in controlling the formation of foci in response to DNA-damaging agents. We review these regulatory mechanisms and discuss their biological significance to the DDR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Protein dynamics to and from sites of DNA breaks. DNA damage checkpoint and repair factors and modulators of chromatin organization are recruited (green arrows) to DNA breaks (SSB and DSB), while transcription machineries are excluded from DDR foci (red arrows), and the dynamics of structural chromatin components operate in both directions (orange arrows).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Methods for studying the recruitment of DDR proteins to DNA breaks. Scheme describing the multiple methods used to generate or mimic DNA breaks in vitro and in vivo and the techniques employed to monitor recruitment of DDR factors to such breaks.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Spatial organization of DDR protein accumulation at DNA DSBs. (A) DDR signal spreading. DDR proteins initially accumulate at DSB sites and then spread at distance via a positive feedback loop involving MDC1, which binds γH2AX, the MRN complex, and ATM kinase, which phosphorylates additional H2AX molecules further away from the break site. (B) Regional distribution of DDR proteins around DSBs. Factors involved in ATR signaling accumulate proximal to the break site on ssDNA generated by DNA end resection, while ATM signaling factors localize on flanking chromatin regions.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Temporal regulation of DDR protein accumulation at DNA breaks. (A) Sequential recruitment of DDR factors to SSBs and DSBs generated by laser microirradiation. (B) Cell cycle regulation of DDR foci formation. (Solid line) Efficient focus formation; (dashed line) weak/undetectable foci.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Binding platforms at DNA breaks. NBS1, MDC1, XRCC1, and XRCC4 act as binding platforms for the recruitment of other DDR factors to DNA breaks promoting DNA damage signaling and/or repair. Dotted lines indicate protein–protein interactions, while horizontal lines at the end of the dotted lines indicate interacting regions. Some interactions involve post-translational modifications. (P) Phosphorylation; (PAR) PARylation. The red and the green semicircles represent BRCT and FHA domains, respectively. (b) Basic region at the end of the first BRCT domain of XRCC1 that interacts with poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated PARPs.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Specialized binding modules for recognition of post-translational modifications (PTMs) at DNA breaks. The recruitment of DDR proteins to modified histones or other modified proteins at sites of DNA breaks is mediated by specific interactions between the post-translational modification and a dedicated binding module. BRCT and FHA domains, which are represented by red and green semicircles, bind phosphorylated serine or threonine residues; Tudor domains, chromodomains, and PDH finger domains bind methylated histones; bromodomains (Bromo) bind acetylated histones; and UBDs bind ubiquitylated proteins. The PAR-binding domain can take the form of a basic stretch of amino acids (Basic), a PAR-binding zinc finger (PBZ), or a macrodomain (Macro). Note that some of these modules are found as tandem domains and that not all post-translational modifications are damage-induced (asterisk [*] denotes constitutive modifications). The species of the proteins are indicated, unless only human proteins are listed. (H.s.) Homo sapiens; (S.c.) S. cerevisiae, (S.p.) S. pombe.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahel I, Ahel D, Matsusaka T, Clark AJ, Pines J, Boulton SJ, West SC 2008. Poly(ADP-ribose)-binding zinc finger motifs in DNA repair/checkpoint proteins. Nature 451: 81–85 - PubMed
    1. Ahel D, Horejsi Z, Wiechens N, Polo SE, Garcia-Wilson E, Ahel I, Flynn H, Skehel M, West SC, Jackson SP, et al. 2009. Poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent regulation of DNA repair by the chromatin remodeling enzyme ALC1. Science 325: 1240–1243 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Hakim A, Escribano-Diaz C, Landry MC, O'Donnell L, Panier S, Szilard RK, Durocher D 2010. The ubiquitous role of ubiquitin in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst) 9: 1229–1240 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alpi AF, Patel KJ 2009. Monoubiquitylation in the Fanconi anemia DNA damage response pathway. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 430–435 - PubMed
    1. Altmannova V, Eckert-Boulet N, Arneric M, Kolesar P, Chaloupkova R, Damborsky J, Sung P, Zhao X, Lisby M, Krejci L 2010. Rad52 SUMOylation affects the efficiency of the DNA repair. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 4708–4721 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources