Comparative Quantification of Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Risk Factors
- PMID: 21250375
- Bookshelf ID: NBK11813
Comparative Quantification of Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Risk Factors
Excerpt
To permit the assessment of risk factors in a unified framework while acknowledging characteristics specific to individual risk factors, the Comparative Risk Assessment (CRA) project initiated a systematic evaluation of the changes in population health that would result from modifying the population distribution of exposure to a risk factor or to a group of risk factors (Murray and others 2003; Murray and Lopez 1999; Ezzati and others 2004). In particular, the CRA framework
compares the burden of disease due to the observed distribution of exposure in a population with the burden from an alternative distribution consistently defined across risk factors;
considers multiple stages in the causal network of multiple risk factors and disease outcomes to allow inferences about combinations of risk factors for which epidemiological studies have not been conducted, including the joint effects of changes in multiple risk factors;
converts the burden of disease and injury into a summary measure of population health that permits comparing fatal and nonfatal outcomes while also taking severity and duration into account (the summary measure used in this chapter is the disability-adjusted life year [DALY], whose definition and calculation are described in chapter 3).
Therefore, even though CRA is similar to other risk assessment exercises in the sense that it applies knowledge about the hazardous effects of risk factors from epidemiological research to data on exposure in the broader population, it creates conceptual and methodological consistency in measuring the impacts of various risk factors on population health. Furthermore, we have attempted to use consistent and comparable criteria for evaluating the scientific evidence on prevalence, causality, and magnitude of hazardous effects across risk factors. As a result, the unified framework for describing population exposure to risk factors and their consequences for population health is an important step in linking the growing interest in the causal determinants of health across a variety of disciplines from natural, physical, and medical sciences to the social sciences and humanities.
Copyright © 2006, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank Group.
Sections
- Burden of Disease Attributable to Risk Factors
- Risk Factor Selection
- Burden of Disease Attributable to Individual Risk Factors
- Joint Effects of Multiple Risk Factors
- Burden of Disease Attributable to Multiple Risk Factors
- Directions for Future Research
- Discussion
- ANNEX 4A: Population Attributable Fractions, Attributable Deaths, Years of Life Lost Because of Premature Mortality (YLL), and Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) by Risk Factor, Disease Outcome, Age, Sex, and Region
- References
Similar articles
-
Excess Mortality from Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders in the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.In: Patel V, Chisholm D, Dua T, Laxminarayan R, Medina-Mora ME, editors. Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 4). Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2016 Mar 14. Chapter 3. In: Patel V, Chisholm D, Dua T, Laxminarayan R, Medina-Mora ME, editors. Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 4). Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2016 Mar 14. Chapter 3. PMID: 27227239 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Comparative quantification of health risks conceptual framework and methodological issues.Popul Health Metr. 2003 Apr 14;1(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-1-1. Popul Health Metr. 2003. PMID: 12780936 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating risk factor attributable burden - challenges and potential solutions when using the comparative risk assessment methodology.Arch Public Health. 2022 May 27;80(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00900-8. Arch Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35624479 Free PMC article.
-
Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease.Lancet. 2002 Nov 2;360(9343):1347-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11403-6. Lancet. 2002. PMID: 12423980 Review.
-
Measuring the population burden of fatal and nonfatal injury.Epidemiol Rev. 2012;34:17-31. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr022. Epub 2011 Nov 23. Epidemiol Rev. 2012. PMID: 22113244 Review.
References
-
- Arrow K., Bolin B., Costanza R., Dasgupta P., Folke C., Holling C. S., Jansson B.-O., Levin S., Maler K.-G., Perrings C., Pimente D. Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment. Science. 1995;168(2):520–21. - PubMed
-
- Berlin J. A., Colditz G. A. A Meta-analysis of Physical Activity in the Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1990;132(4):612–28. - PubMed
-
- Black R. E. Would Control of Childhood Infectious Diseases Reduce Malnutrition? Acta Paediatrica Scandandinavica Supplement. 1991;374:133–40. - PubMed
-
- Blair S. N., Cheng Y., Holder J. S. Is Physical Activity or Physical Fitness More Important in Defining Health Benefits? Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2001;33(6 Suppl):S379–S399. - PubMed
-
- Briend A. Is Diarrhoea a Major Cause of Malnutrition among the Under-Fives in Developing Countries? A Review of Available Evidence. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1990;44(9):611–28. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials