Short-term outcomes of induction therapy with tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide for active lupus nephritis: A multicenter randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 21177013
- DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.08.036
Short-term outcomes of induction therapy with tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide for active lupus nephritis: A multicenter randomized clinical trial
Erratum in
- Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Aug;58(2):330-3
Abstract
Background: Intravenous cyclophosphamide with prednisone is an effective treatment for lupus nephritis, but with significant toxicities. We compared the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus intravenous cyclophosphamide as induction therapy.
Study design: Multicenter noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
Setting & participants: 81 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis from 9 nephrology centers in China from 2006-2008.
Intervention: Prednisone and either tacrolimus (n = 42) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (n = 39) for 6 months. Tacrolimus was started at 0.05 mg/kg/d and titrated to achieve a trough blood concentration of 5-10 ng/mL. Intravenous cyclophosphamide was initiated at 750 mg/m² of body surface area, then adjusted to 500-1,000 mg/m² every 4 weeks for a total of 6 pulse treatments.
Outcomes & measurements: The primary outcome was complete remission (proteinuria with protein excretion <0.3 g/24 h, serum albumin ≥3.5 g/dL, normal urinary sediment, and normal or stable serum creatinine level) at 6 months. Response (complete or partial remission), clinical parameters, and adverse effects were secondary end points.
Results: After the 6-month induction therapy, the tacrolimus group achieved higher cumulative probabilities of complete remission and response (52.4% vs 38.5% and 90.5% vs 82.1%, respectively) than the intravenous cyclophosphamide group, but differences were not statistically significant (log-rank test, P = 0.2 and P = 0.7, respectively). Proteinuria [corrected] was significantly decreased in tacrolimus- versus intravenous cyclophosphamide-treated patients after the first month of treatment, even with adjustment for baseline proteinuria (protein excretion, 1.76 vs 2.40 g/d; P = 0.02 for the log-transformed analysis). [corrected] After treatment, serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rates were not significantly different between treatment groups. Adverse effects, such as leukopenia and gastrointestinal symptoms, were less frequent in the tacrolimus group.
Limitations: Nonblinded, small sample size, and short duration of follow-up.
Conclusions: In conjunction with prednisone, induction therapy with tacrolimus is at least as efficacious as intravenous cyclophosphamide and prednisone in producing complete remission of lupus nephritis and has a more favorable safety profile.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00615173.
Copyright © 2011 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Multitarget therapy for induction treatment of lupus nephritis: a randomized trial.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):18-26. doi: 10.7326/M14-1030. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25383558 Clinical Trial.
-
Tacrolimus versus intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide therapy in Chinese adults with steroid-resistant idiopathic minimal change nephropathy: a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized cohort trial.Clin Ther. 2012 May;34(5):1112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 12. Clin Ther. 2012. PMID: 22503105 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized pilot trial comparing cyclosporine and azathioprine for maintenance therapy in diffuse lupus nephritis over four years.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Sep;1(5):925-32. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02271205. Epub 2006 Jun 28. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006. PMID: 17699309 Clinical Trial.
-
[Treatment of nephritis in systemic lupus erythematodes].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1996 Sep 28;140(39):1941-4. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1996. PMID: 8927179 Review. Dutch. No abstract available.
-
Optimum therapeutic approaches for lupus nephritis: what therapy and for whom?Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2005 Nov;1(1):22-30. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0016. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2005. PMID: 16932624 Review.
Cited by
-
Lupus Nephritis: Current Perspectives and Moving Forward.J Inflamm Res. 2022 Dec 2;15:6533-6552. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S363722. eCollection 2022. J Inflamm Res. 2022. PMID: 36483271 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-Term Results of Triple Immunosuppression With Tacrolimus Added to Mycophenolate and Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis.Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Dec 14;7(3):516-525. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.12.005. eCollection 2022 Mar. Kidney Int Rep. 2021. PMID: 35257064 Free PMC article.
-
Glomerular Disease in Women.Kidney Int Rep. 2018 Feb 2;3(2):258-270. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.01.010. eCollection 2018 Mar. Kidney Int Rep. 2018. PMID: 29725630 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A review of advances in the understanding of lupus nephritis pathogenesis as a basis for emerging therapies.F1000Res. 2020 Aug 4;9:F1000 Faculty Rev-905. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22438.1. eCollection 2020. F1000Res. 2020. PMID: 32789005 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tacrolimus in non-Asian patients with SLE: a real-life experience from three European centres.Lupus Sci Med. 2018 Nov 2;5(1):e000274. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2018-000274. eCollection 2018. Lupus Sci Med. 2018. PMID: 30538815 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources