Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct-Dec;4(4):244-51.
doi: 10.4161/pri.4.4.13597. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

Countering amyloid polymorphism and drug resistance with minimal drug cocktails

Martin L Duennwald  1 , James Shorter
Affiliations

Countering amyloid polymorphism and drug resistance with minimal drug cocktails

Martin L Duennwald et al. Prion. 2010 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Several fatal, progressive neurodegenerative diseases, including various prion and prion-like disorders, are connected with the misfolding of specific proteins. These proteins misfold into toxic oligomeric species and a spectrum of distinct self-templating amyloid structures, termed strains. Hence, small molecules that prevent or reverse these protein-misfolding events might have therapeutic utility. Yet it is unclear whether a single small molecule can antagonize the complete repertoire of misfolded forms encompassing diverse amyloid polymorphs and soluble oligomers. We have begun to investigate this issue using the yeast prion protein Sup35 as an experimental paradigm. We have discovered that a polyphenol, (-)epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), effectively inhibited the formation of infectious amyloid forms (prions) of Sup35 and even remodeled preassembled prions. Surprisingly, EGCG selectively modulated specific prion strains and even selected for EGCG-resistant prion strains with novel structural and biological characteristics. Thus, treatment with a single small molecule antagonist of amyloidogenesis can select for novel, drug-resistant amyloid polymorphs. Importantly, combining EGCG with another small molecule, 4,5-bis-(4-methoxyanilino)phthalimide, synergistically antagonized and remodeled a wide array of Sup35 prion strains without producing any drug-resistant prions. We suggest that minimal drug cocktails, small collections of drugs that collectively antagonize all amyloid polymorphs, should be identified to besiege various neurodegenerative disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sup35 prion strains and small-molecule antagonists. (A) Sup35 is a modular protein comprised of a C-terminal GTPase domain (C, amino acids 254–685, black), a highly charged middle domain (M, amino acids 124–253, dark grey) and an N-terminal domain (N, amino acids 1–123, light grey) enriched in glutamine, asparagine, tyrosine and glycine residues. Together N and M (NM) confer all the properties needed to form a stable prion in yeast. NM is termed the prion domain. Within N, prion recognition elements termed the “head” (red) and “tail” (green), which flank a “central core” (blue), play important roles in prion formation., (B) Sup35 prions adopt a polymeric cross-beta structure. In one proposed model (left), this amyloid structure is composed of the head (red), central core (blue) and tail (green) regions of N. The M and C domains are located on the exterior of this structure and are not depicted for clarity. If we zoom in on three adjacent monomers in the Sup35 prion polymer, we find that the prion is proposed to be maintained by an alternating sequence of head-to-head (red) and tail-to-tail (green) intermolecular contacts. The central core is sequestered in intramolecular contacts (blue). Different Sup35 prion strains assemble under different environmental conditions. Thus, NM25 assembles at 25°C or when NM is chemically crosslinked with BMB in the tail region., NM4 assembles at 4°C or when NM is chemically crosslinked with BMB in the head region., NM4E assembles in the presence of EGCG at 4°C. These prion strains have subtle differences in the precise residues that comprise the head, tail and central core (right). The residues that comprise the head, tail and central core are shown to the right of each central protomer. NM25, NM4 and NM4E are distinguished by their different tail-to-tail contacts and central core region. Moreover, NM4E has a distinct head-to-head contact. Infection of [psi−] [pin−] cells with NM25 yields mostly weak [PSI+] variants, whereas NM4 yields mostly strong [PSI+] variants. By contrast, NM4E generates purely strong [PSI+] variants (pie charts in lower portion). (C) Chemical structure of EGCG. (D) Chemical structure of DAPH-12.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cushman M, Johnson BS, King OD, Gitler AD, Shorter J. Prion-like disorders: blurring the divide between transmissibility and infectivity. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:1191–1201. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soto C, Estrada LD. Protein misfolding and neurodegeneration. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:184–189. - PubMed
    1. Forman MS, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. Neurodegenerative diseases: a decade of discoveries paves the way for therapeutic breakthroughs. Nat Med. 2004;10:1055–1063. - PubMed
    1. Fandrich M. On the structural definition of amyloid fibrils and other polypeptide aggregates. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:2066–2078. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson R, Eisenberg D. Structural models of amyloid-like fibrils. Adv Protein Chem. 2006;73:235–282. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms