Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Aug 17;19(2):194-206.
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.07.018.

Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrin-mediated rigidity sensing

Affiliations
Review

Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrin-mediated rigidity sensing

Simon W Moore et al. Dev Cell. .

Abstract

Matrix and tissue rigidity guides many cellular processes, including the differentiation of stem cells and the migration of cells in health and disease. Cells actively and transiently test rigidity using mechanisms limited by inherent physical parameters that include the strength of extracellular attachments, the pulling capacity on these attachments, and the sensitivity of the mechanotransduction system. Here, we focus on rigidity sensing mediated through the integrin family of extracellular matrix receptors and linked proteins and discuss the evidence supporting these proteins as mechanosensors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Rigidity Moduli and the Energy Landscapes of a Slip bond
(A) Stress is the amount of force applied per area (F/A) and strain is the displacement in the direction of applied force relative to initial length (Δx/L or ΔL/L). While both elastic and shear moduli are the ratio of stress over strain, there is a difference in the direction of the applied force. (B) The energy landscapes of a slip bond with and without applied force.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Important Parameters of Rigidity Sensing
Reported values of the strength (A), rates (B), forces (C) and elasticity (D) of components involved in the coupling of the ECM to the cytoskeleton through integrins. References: (1) (Kishino and Yanagida, 1988), (2) (Jiang et al., 2003), (3) table 2, (4) see text, (5) table 1, (6) (Kovar and Pollard, 2004; Mogilner and Oster, 1996; Peskin et al., 1993), (7) (Tseng et al., 2005).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mechanosensory Proteins in Integrin Mediated Rigidity Sensing
Proteins that bind directly to the depicted domains are highlighted in yellow boxes. (A) FAK does not bind integrins or actin directly but its kinase activity is regulated by mechanical force and it has been hypothesized that removal of the FERM domain from the kinase could play a role (Cooper et al., 2003). (B) The substrate domain of p130Cas contains fifteen tyrosine residues that become exposed upon stretching (Sawada et al., 2006). (C) Stretching of talin’s rod domain exposes vinculin binding sites (del Rio et al., 2009). (D) Extension of filamin immunoglobulin repeats (labeled 1-24) has been shown by AFM (Furuike et al., 2001) and could regulate the binding of proteins. (E) α-actinin forms antiparallel dimers; mechanical force could regulate this dimerization or its association with other proteins.
Figure 4
Figure 4. The Rigidity Sensing Cycle and Models for Uniform Displacements
(A) A possible rigidity sensing cycle involves three mechanosensory events: (1) integrin/ECM catch bond formation, (2) stretching of talin that reinforces the adhesion by recruiting vinculin and (3) stretching of FAK that activates its kinase domain leading to the disassembly and recycling of the adhesion. (B,C) Two models to explain the uniform displacements of approximately 100nm, one where the reference structure is the polymerization complex (B) and the other where a stable actin network provides the reference structure (C). In both models the key decision is based on whether the extension of the link to retrograde flowing actin (e.g. talin) occurs before the link to the reference structure is broken.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ainavarapu SR, Brujic J, Huang HH, Wiita AP, Lu H, Li L, Walther KA, Carrion-Vazquez M, Li H, Fernandez JM. Contour length and refolding rate of a small protein controlled by engineered disulfide bonds. Biophys J. 2007;92:225–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ando J, Yamamoto K. Vascular mechanobiology: endothelial cell responses to fluid shear stress. Circ J. 2009;73:1983–92. - PubMed
    1. Arnold M, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Glass R, Blummel J, Eck W, Kantlehner M, Kessler H, Spatz JP. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. Chemphyschem. 2004;5:383–8. - PubMed
    1. Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Riveline D, Goichberg P, Tzur G, Sabanay I, Mahalu D, Safran S, Bershadsky A, Addadi L, Geiger B. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:466–72. - PubMed
    1. Balgude AP, Yu X, Szymanski A, Bellamkonda RV. Agarose gel stiffness determines rate of DRG neurite extension in 3D cultures. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1077–84. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources