On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials
- PMID: 20367730
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01347.x
On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials
Abstract
Randomized trials are undoubtedly different from observational studies, but authors sometimes propose differences between these designs that do not exist. In this article we examine two claims about randomized trials: first, a recent claim that the causal structure of exposure measurement (information) bias in a randomized trial differs from the causal structure of that bias in an observational study. Second, a long-standing claim that confounding bias cannot operate in a randomized trial - if randomization was perfectly implemented. Using causal diagrams (causal directed acyclic graphs), we show that both claims are false in the context of an intention-to-treat analysis. We also describe a previously unrecognized mechanism of information bias, and suggest that the term 'information bias' should replace the terms 'measurement bias' and 'observation bias'.
Similar articles
-
Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias.J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Jun;15(3):436-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01031.x. Epub 2009 Apr 2. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009. PMID: 19366394
-
Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Nov 15;166(10):1203-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm189. Epub 2007 Aug 21. Am J Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 17712019
-
Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.Stat Med. 2007 Dec 10;26(28):5125-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.2927. Stat Med. 2007. PMID: 17525935
-
Beyond randomized controlled trials: a critical comparison of trials with nonrandomized studies.Hepatology. 2006 Nov;44(5):1075-82. doi: 10.1002/hep.21404. Hepatology. 2006. PMID: 17058242 Review.
-
Confounding in health research.Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:189-212. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.189. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001. PMID: 11274518 Review.
Cited by
-
Causal diagrams and the cross-sectional study.Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:57-65. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S42843. Epub 2013 Mar 9. Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23516121 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of a home-environmental intervention package and an early child development intervention on child health and development in high-altitude rural communities in the Peruvian Andes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Jun 6;11(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-00985-x. Infect Dis Poverty. 2022. PMID: 35668472 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Causal diagrams, information bias, and thought bias.Pragmat Obs Res. 2010 Dec 10;1:33-47. doi: 10.2147/POR.S13335. eCollection 2010. Pragmat Obs Res. 2010. PMID: 27774007 Free PMC article.
-
Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Oct 13;15:85. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0079-x. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015. PMID: 26462565 Free PMC article.
-
A counterfactual approach to bias and effect modification in terms of response types.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jul 31;13:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-101. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013. PMID: 23902658 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources