Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 17;5(2):e9215.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009215.

Point of care strategy for rapid diagnosis of novel A/H1N1 influenza virus

Affiliations

Point of care strategy for rapid diagnosis of novel A/H1N1 influenza virus

Antoine Nougairede et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

  • PLoS One. 2010;5(4). doi: 10.1371/annotation/5c0b32ed-3c18-4634-9f59-f5968e91710f

Abstract

Background: Within months of the emergence of the novel A/H1N1 pandemic influenza virus (nA/H1N1v), systematic screening for the surveillance of the pandemic was abandoned in France and in some other countries. At the end of June 2009, we implemented, for the public hospitals of Marseille, a Point Of Care (POC) strategy for rapid diagnosis of the novel A/H1N1 influenza virus, in order to maintain local surveillance and to evaluate locally the kinetics of the pandemic.

Methodology/principal findings: Two POC laboratories, located in strategic places, were organized to receive and test samples 24 h/24. POC strategy consisted of receiving and processing naso-pharyngeal specimens in preparation for the rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) and real-time RT-PCR assay (rtRT-PCR). This strategy had the theoretical capacity of processing up to 36 samples per 24 h. When the flow of samples was too high, the rtRT-PCR test was abandoned in the POC laboratories and transferred to the core virology laboratory. Confirmatory diagnosis was performed in the core virology laboratory twice a day using two distinct rtRT-PCR techniques that detect either influenza A virus or nA/N1N1v. Over a period of three months, 1974 samples were received in the POC laboratories, of which 111 were positive for nA/H1N1v. Specificity and sensitivity of RIDT were 100%, and 57.7% respectively. Positive results obtained using RIDT were transmitted to clinical practitioners in less than 2 hours. POC processed rtRT-PCR results were available within 7 hours, and rtRT-PCR confirmation within 24 hours.

Conclusions/significance: The POC strategy is of benefit, in all cases (with or without rtRT-PCR assay), because it provides continuous reception/processing of samples and reduction of the time to provide consolidated results to the clinical practitioners. We believe that implementation of the POC strategy for the largest number of suspect cases may improve the quality of patient care and our knowledge of the epidemiology of the pandemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. POC laboratories organization in Marseille.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Flow capacity in POC laboratory for detection of nA/H1N1v.
Black boxes represent sample receipt, registration, processing, aliquoting, internal control spiking and rapid influenza A+B test (2 h for 6 samples). Light grey boxes represent RNA extraction (6 maximum) and PCR-mix preparation (1 h30). Dark grey boxes represent rtRT-PCR (detection of nA/H1N1v on SmartCycler), interpretation and results validation (3 h).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Time distribution of samples tested and positive for nA/H1N1v in POC laboratories.
Positive samples correspond to rtRT-PCR core laboratory-confirmed results regardless the result obtained at the POC level.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Flow chart of POC samples with sensitivity and specificity of each step.
PPV: Positive predictive value. NPV: Negative predictive value.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Time distribution of samples received/positive from adult and pediatric emergency wards.
Positive samples correspond to rtRT-PCR core laboratory-confirmed results regardless the result obtained at the POC level. ★: p<0.01 (chi-square test).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Number of samples tested/positive in the core laboratory from April to September 2009.
Samples were tested using two rtRT-PCR assays (see materials and methods).

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Statement to the press by WHO Director-General Dr Margaret Chan. 2009. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2009/h1n1_pandemic_phase6.... Accessed on 2009 Aug. 15.
    1. Levy-Bruhl D, Vaux S. Modified surveillance of influenza A(H1N1)v virus infections in France. Euro Surveill. 2009;14 - PubMed
    1. InVS: Institut de Veille Sanitaire, France. Bulletin épidémiologique grippe A (H1N1) 2009. Point au 29 septembre 2009 à 11 h. 2009. Available: http://www.invs.sante.fr/display/?doc=surveillance/grippe_dossier/index_.... Accessed on 2009 Oct. 20.
    1. Belgian working group on influenza A(H1N1)v. Influenza A(H1N1)v virus infections in Belgium, May-June 2009. Euro Surveill. 2009;14 - PubMed
    1. Lytras T, Theocharopoulos G, Tsiodras S, Mentis A, Panagiotopoulos T, et al. Enhanced surveillance of influenza A(H1N1)v in Greece during the containment phase. Euro Surveill. 2009;14 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms