Direct comparison of treatment responses, remission rates, and drug adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: results from eight years of surveillance of clinical practice in the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry
- PMID: 20039405
- DOI: 10.1002/art.27227
Direct comparison of treatment responses, remission rates, and drug adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: results from eight years of surveillance of clinical practice in the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry
Abstract
Objective: To compare tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors directly regarding the rates of treatment response, remission, and the drug survival rate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to identify clinical prognostic factors for response.
Methods: The nationwide DANBIO registry collects data on rheumatology patients receiving routine care. For the present study, we included patients from DANBIO who had RA (n = 2,326) in whom the first biologic treatment was initiated (29% received adalimumab, 22% received etanercept, and 49% received infliximab). Baseline predictors of treatment response were identified. The odds ratios (ORs) for clinical responses and remission and hazard ratios (HRs) for drug withdrawal were calculated, corrected for age, disease duration, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), seropositivity, concomitant methotrexate and prednisolone, number of previous disease-modifying drugs, center, and functional status (Health Assessment Questionnaire score).
Results: Seventy percent improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (an ACR70 response) was achieved in 19% of patients after 6 months. Older age, concomitant prednisolone treatment, and low functional status at baseline were negative predictors. The ORs (95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) for an ACR70 response were 2.05 (95% CI 1.52-2.76) for adalimumab versus infliximab, 1.78 (95% CI 1.28-2.50) for etanercept versus infliximab, and 1.15 (95% CI 0.82-1.60) for adalimumab versus etanercept. Similar predictors and ORs were observed for a good response according to the European League Against Rheumatism criteria, DAS28 remission, and Clinical Disease Activity Index remission. At 48 months, the HRs for drug withdrawal were 1.98 for infliximab versus etanercept (95% 1.63-2.40), 1.35 for infliximab versus adalimumab (95% CI 1.15-1.58), and 1.47 for adalimumab versus etanercept (95% CI 1.20-1.80).
Conclusion: Older age, low functional status, and concomitant prednisolone treatment were negative predictors of a clinical response and remission. Infliximab had the lowest rates of treatment response, disease remission, and drug adherence, adalimumab had the highest rates of treatment response and disease remission, and etanercept had the longest drug survival rates. These findings were consistent after correction for confounders and sensitivity analyses and across outcome measures and followup times.
Comment in
-
Comparison between adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis: comment on the article by Hetland et al.Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep;62(9):2826; author reply 2826-8. doi: 10.1002/art.27606. Arthritis Rheum. 2010. PMID: 20556822 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Modern treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis.Dan Med Bull. 2011 Nov;58(11):B4320. Dan Med Bull. 2011. PMID: 22047935
-
Persistence with anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: observations from the RADIUS registry.J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):1273-81. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101142. Epub 2011 May 15. J Rheumatol. 2011. PMID: 21572150
-
Comparison of long-term clinical outcome with etanercept treatment and adalimumab treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with respect to immunogenicity.Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Dec;64(12):3850-5. doi: 10.1002/art.34680. Arthritis Rheum. 2012. PMID: 22933315
-
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(42):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-229. doi: 10.3310/hta10420. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 17049139 Review.
-
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2011 Mar;15(14):1-278. doi: 10.3310/hta15140. Health Technol Assess. 2011. PMID: 21439251 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The practical value of biologics registries in Africa and Middle East: challenges and opportunities.Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Mar;31(3):407-16. doi: 10.1007/s10067-011-1918-8. Epub 2012 Jan 7. Clin Rheumatol. 2012. PMID: 22228237 Review.
-
Dose modifications of anti-TNF drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients under real-world settings: a systematic review.Rheumatol Int. 2015 Jul;35(7):1193-210. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3222-4. Epub 2015 Feb 1. Rheumatol Int. 2015. PMID: 25638015 Review.
-
Rheumatoid arthritis patients on persistent moderate disease activity on biologics have adverse 5-year outcome compared to persistent low-remission status and represent a heterogeneous group.Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Sep 29;22(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02313-w. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020. PMID: 32993800 Free PMC article.
-
Protection from articular damage by passive or active anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α immunotherapy in human TNF-α transgenic mice depends on anti-TNF-α antibody levels.Clin Exp Immunol. 2013 Apr;172(1):54-62. doi: 10.1111/cei.12040. Clin Exp Immunol. 2013. PMID: 23480185 Free PMC article.
-
Drug adherence to biologic DMARDS with a special emphasis on the benefits of subcutaneous abatacept.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:589-96. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S23786. Epub 2012 Aug 15. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012. PMID: 22936845 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical