Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;92(2):157-63.
doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

Translation factor LepA contributes to tellurite resistance in Escherichia coli but plays no apparent role in the fidelity of protein synthesis

Shinichiro Shoji  1 , Brian D Janssen, Christopher S Hayes, Kurt Fredrick
Affiliations

Translation factor LepA contributes to tellurite resistance in Escherichia coli but plays no apparent role in the fidelity of protein synthesis

Shinichiro Shoji et al. Biochimie. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

LepA is a translational GTPase highly conserved in bacterial lineages. While it has been shown that LepA can catalyze reverse ribosomal translocation in vitro, the role of LepA in the cell remains unclear. Here, we show that deletion of the lepA gene (DeltalepA) in Escherichia coli causes hypersensitivity to potassium tellurite and penicillin G, but has no appreciable effect on growth under many other conditions. DeltalepA does not increase miscoding or frameshifting errors under normal or stress conditions, indicating that LepA does not contribute to the fidelity of translation. Overexpression of LepA interferes with tmRNA-mediated peptide tagging and A-site mRNA cleavage, suggesting that LepA is a bona fide translation factor that can act on stalled ribosomes with a vacant A site in vivo. Together these results lead us to hypothesize that LepA is involved in co-translational folding of proteins that are otherwise vulnerable to tellurite oxidation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Phenotypes of a ΔlepA strain
(A) RT-PCR of the lep transcript in ΔlepA cells. Genomic organization of the lep operon is shown in the left panel. Total RNA was extracted from control or ΔlepA cells in mid-log phase and amplified by gene-specific primers (indicated by thin arrows on each gene). (B) Growth curves of a wild-type and ΔlepA strain in LB medium at 37°C in the absence (control) or presence of 0.05 μg/ml potassium tellurite, 20 μg/ml penicillin G, 40 μg/ml paraquat, 15 μg/ml phenazine methosulfate, or 100 mM MgCl2 (as indicated). In the latter case, the pH of media was adjusted to 5 with HCl prior to inoculation. All data points in the figure include error bars; many of them are smaller than the symbols. (C) Complementation of phenotypes of ΔlepA cells by plasmid pLEPA harboring the lepA gene. Overnight culture of wild-type and ΔlepA strains carrying either empty vector or pLEPA were diluted in LB medium by a factor of 102, 104, 105, 106, and 107. A 10 μl aliquot of each dilution was spotted on LB plates containing 0.05 or 0.4 μg/ml potassium tellurite, and the plates were incubated at 37°C until colonies became visible.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effects of LepA and BipA on the tmRNA quality control system
(A) Analysis of tmRNA(DD)-mediated tagging of protein expressed from a non-stop mRNA. The N-terminal domain of cI repressor was purified by Ni2+-affinity chromatography and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. Untagged cI repressor accumulates in ΔtmRNA cells, whereas most of the repressor protein is tagged in tmRNA(DD) cells. The percentage (mean ± SEM) of tmRNA(DD)-tagged protein for each strain is indicated. (B) Effect of LepA and BipA overexpression on tmRNA(DD) tagging. The N-terminal domain of cI repressor was purified from cells containing plasmid-borne PBAD-lepA (left panel) or PBAD-bipA (right panel) grown in the absence (−) or presence (+) of arabinose. The percentage (mean ± SEM) of tmRNA(DD)-tagged protein for each strain is indicated. (C) Northern blot analysis of flag-(m)ybeL(PP) mRNA for A-site mRNA cleavage. RNA was isolated from strains carrying plasmid-borne PBAD-lepA (left panel) or PBAD-bipA (right panel) grown in the absence (−) or presence (+) of arabinose. Two mRNA species corresponding to full-length and A-site cleaved messages were detected (as indicated). An in vitro transcript corresponding to A-site cleaved mRNA was used as a size marker (lanes 1 and 4). (D) Analysis of tmRNA(DD)-mediated tagging of protein expressed from ybeL(PP) mRNA. His6-YbeL(PP) was purified by Ni2+-affinity chromatography, followed by SDS-PAGE analysis and Coomassie blue staining.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Margus T, Remm M, Tenson T. Phylogenetic distribution of translational GTPases in bacteria. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leipe DD, Wolf YI, Koonin EV, Aravind L. Classification and evolution of P-loop GTPases and related ATPases. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;317:41–72. - PubMed
    1. March PE, Inouye M. Characterization of the lep operon of Escherichia coli. Identification of the promoter and the gene upstream of the signal peptidase I gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1985;260:7206–7213. - PubMed
    1. Date T, Wickner W. Isolation of the Escherichia coli leader peptidase gene and effects of leader peptidase overproduction in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1981;78:6106–6110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dibb NJ, Wolfe PB. lep operon proximal gene is not required for growth or secretion by Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1986;166:83–87. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources