Design and statistical analysis of oral medicine studies: common pitfalls
- PMID: 19874532
- PMCID: PMC2879019
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01634.x
Design and statistical analysis of oral medicine studies: common pitfalls
Abstract
A growing number of articles are emerging in the medical and statistics literature that describe epidemiologic and statistical flaws of research studies. Many examples of these deficiencies are encountered in the oral, craniofacial, and dental literature. However, only a handful of methodologic articles have been published in the oral literature warning investigators of potential errors that may arise early in the study and that can irreparably bias the final results. In this study, we briefly review some of the most common pitfalls that our team of epidemiologists and statisticians has identified during the review of submitted or published manuscripts and research grant applications. We use practical examples from the oral medicine and dental literature to illustrate potential shortcomings in the design and analysis of research studies, and how these deficiencies may affect the results and their interpretation. A good study design is essential, because errors in the analysis can be corrected if the design was sound, but flaws in study design can lead to data that are not salvageable. We recommend consultation with an epidemiologist or a statistician during the planning phase of a research study to optimize study efficiency, minimize potential sources of bias, and document the analytic plan.
Similar articles
-
Introduction to multilevel modelling in dental research.Community Dent Health. 2000 Dec;17(4):222-6. Community Dent Health. 2000. PMID: 11191196
-
Statistical errors in medical research - a review of common pitfalls.Swiss Med Wkly. 2007 Jan 27;137(3-4):44-9. doi: 10.4414/smw.2007.11587. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007. PMID: 17299669 Review.
-
Research in a dental practice setting.Dent Update. 2004 Sep;31(7):423-4, 427-30. doi: 10.12968/denu.2004.31.7.423. Dent Update. 2004. PMID: 15485125
-
Epidemiology for the practicing orthodontist.Semin Orthod. 1999 Jun;5(2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/s1073-8746(99)80027-9. Semin Orthod. 1999. PMID: 10530281
-
Use of multiple imputation in the epidemiologic literature.Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug 15;168(4):355-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn071. Epub 2008 Jun 30. Am J Epidemiol. 2008. PMID: 18591202 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Cochrane and the COMET initiative: developing the evidence base in oral medicine.Br Dent J. 2017 Dec;223(9):729-732. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.893. Epub 2017 Nov 3. Br Dent J. 2017. PMID: 29097795
-
Radiofrequency: the next step for gingival depigmentation.J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2013 Jan;6(1):57-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.110103. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2013. PMID: 23723611 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in the top dental specialty journals is suboptimal.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Oct 4;8(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01182-1. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022. PMID: 36192777 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Altman DG. Why we need confidence intervals. World journal of surgery. 2005;29:554–6. - PubMed
-
- Baccaglini L, Schoenbach VJ, Poole C, McKaig RG, Ibrahim J, Baric RS, Wiesen C. Association between herpes simplex virus type 1 and Helicobacter pylori in US adolescents. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. 2006;101:63–9. - PubMed
-
- Baccaglini L, Atkinson JC, Patton LL, Glick M, Ficarra G, Peterson DE. Management of oral lesions in HIV-positive patients. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. 2007a;103(Suppl):S50, e1–23. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources