Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jan;106(4):48-54.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0048. Epub 2009 Jan 23.

Point-of-care testing in microbiology: the advantages and disadvantages of immunochromatographic test strips

Affiliations
Review

Point-of-care testing in microbiology: the advantages and disadvantages of immunochromatographic test strips

Enno Stürenburg et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care testing (POCT) for the demonstration of pathogens was introduced several years ago. The present study describes the current technical status of POCT, giving some examples, and summarizes the specific advantages and disadvantages of the POCT approach in microbiology.

Methods: Selective review of the literature found in medical databases under consideration of current German and international guidelines.

Results/conclusions: The test systems available today are technically mature and offer good to very good performance. For HIV, malaria, group A streptococci, and legionellae, POCT testing, when indicated, is on a par with conventional procedures. The information yielded by rapid tests for pneumococci and for influenza tends to be supplementary in nature. The rapid test for group B streptococci is unsuitable for routine use because its sensitivity is still too low compared with bacterial culture. POCT can be successful only if the tests are performed correctly by trained personnel, quality management procedures are followed, and the severity of illness and the epidemiological circumstances are taken into account when interpreting the results.

Keywords: diagnosis; immune diagnosis; infection risk; laboratory diagnosis; rapid testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sensitivity of the pneumococcal antigen test (Binax NOW) in dependence on the severity of the pneumonia, as measured with the pneumonia severity index (PSI) or the status of the blood culture (BC). The sensitivity of the test was 94% with PSI>90 and 63% with PSI<90 (p<0.001). The sensitivity of the test was 92% with positive blood culture and 74% with negative blood culture (p-value, not significant). The specificity of the test was 100% in the patient group examined (95% confidence interval 99.7% to 100%). Taken from Roson et al., 2004 (14).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Briedigkeit L, Müller-Plathe O, Schlebusch H, Ziems J. Patientennahe Laboratoriumsdiagnostik (Point-of-care-Testing) J Lab Med. 1998;22:414–420.
    1. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab (EBM), Stand 01. 01. 2008. Köln: Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag; 2007.
    1. Hess R, editor. Gebührenordnung für Ärzte (GOÄ) / UV-GOÄ. Köln: Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag; 2008.
    1. Junker R, Luppa P, Ziervogel H, Hoffmann G. Medizinische und wirtschaftliche Bedeutung von POCT. In: Luppa P, Schlebusch H, editors. Patientennahe Sofortdiagnostik (POCT) Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2008. (in print)
    1. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1589–1596. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances