Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- PMID: 19477695
- PMCID: PMC2725198
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.021
Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Abstract
The DNA damage and replication checkpoints are believed to primarily slow the progression of the cell cycle to allow DNA repair to occur. Here we summarize known aspects of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoints including how these responses are integrated into downstream effects on the cell cycle, chromatin, DNA repair, and cytoplasmic targets. Analysis of the transcriptional response demonstrates that it is far more complex and less relevant to the repair of DNA damage than the bacterial SOS response. We also address more speculative questions regarding potential roles of the checkpoint during the normal S-phase and how current evidence hints at a checkpoint activation mechanism mediated by positive feedback that amplifies initial damage signals above a minimum threshold.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chk1p in the response to replication blocks.Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Sep;15(9):4051-63. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-11-0792. Epub 2004 Jun 30. Mol Biol Cell. 2004. PMID: 15229282 Free PMC article.
-
Dual cell cycle checkpoints sensitive to chromosome replication and DNA damage in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Radiat Res. 1992 Nov;132(2):141-3. Radiat Res. 1992. PMID: 1438694 Review.
-
Checkpoint functions are required for normal S-phase progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae RCAF- and CAF-I-defective mutants.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7;103(10):3710-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511102103. Epub 2006 Feb 24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006. PMID: 16501045 Free PMC article.
-
DNA damage checkpoints and DNA replication controls in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Mutat Res. 2000 Jun 30;451(1-2):187-96. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(00)00049-x. Mutat Res. 2000. PMID: 10915872 Review.
-
Checkpoint regulation of DNA replication.Methods Mol Biol. 2009;521:55-70. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-815-7_4. Methods Mol Biol. 2009. PMID: 19563101 Review.
Cited by
-
The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp stimulates DNA resection by Dna2-Sgs1 and Exo1.Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(16):10516-28. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku746. Epub 2014 Aug 13. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014. PMID: 25122752 Free PMC article.
-
DNA damage checkpoint and recombinational repair differentially affect the replication stress tolerance of Smc6 mutants.Mol Biol Cell. 2013 Aug;24(15):2431-41. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-11-0836. Epub 2013 Jun 19. Mol Biol Cell. 2013. PMID: 23783034 Free PMC article.
-
Proteasome-dependent degradation of replisome components regulates faithful DNA replication.Cell Cycle. 2013 Aug 15;12(16):2564-9. doi: 10.4161/cc.25692. Epub 2013 Jul 18. Cell Cycle. 2013. PMID: 23907116 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analysis of replication profiles reveals key role of RFC-Ctf18 in yeast replication stress response.Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010 Nov;17(11):1391-7. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1932. Epub 2010 Oct 24. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010. PMID: 20972444
-
Conditional genetic interactions of RTT107, SLX4, and HRQ1 reveal dynamic networks upon DNA damage in S. cerevisiae.G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Apr 2;4(6):1059-69. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.011205. G3 (Bethesda). 2014. PMID: 24700328 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Weinert TA, Hartwell LH. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1988;241:317–322. - PubMed
-
- Santocanale C, Diffley JF. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature. 1998;395:615–618. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases